Skip to main content
Log in

Translation into Brazilian Portuguese, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Stanford presenteeism scale-6 and work instability scale for ankylosing spondylitis

Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Loss of productivity at work, as a result of health problems, is becoming an issue of interest due to the high burden it represents in society. The measurement of such phenomenon can be made using generic and specific scales for certain diseases such as the Stanford Presenteeism Scale (SPS-6) and the Work Instability Scale for Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS-WIS), specific for patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The aim of this study was to translate and perform a cross-cultural adaptation of SPS-6 and AS-WIS into Portuguese and check their psychometric properties. The study also aimed to evaluate the relationship between the general scores of the scales and the main sociodemographic and clinical data, lifestyles, and absenteeism in patients with AS and correlate these variables with SPS-6 and AS-WIS scales. A sample of 120 patients with AS and 80 workers at a university hospital was evaluated. The processes for the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the instruments followed preestablished steps and rules presented in the literature. For the evaluation of measurement properties and correlations between scales, intra-class correlation coefficient (reproducibility analysis), Cronbach alpha (internal consistency), and Pearson correlation coefficient (validity) were employed. The inter-observer (0.986) and intra-observer (0.992) reproducibilities of the AS-WIS were shown to be high as well as the internal consistency (0.995). Similarly, the inter-observer reliability of SPS-6 was considered good (0.890), although it showed a poorer performance when considering the same observer (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.675 and intra-class correlation = 0.656). Internal consistency, for the total number of items, as measured by Cronbach alpha, was 0.889. The validity of the scales was evaluated thru the comparison of the achieved scores with the results of the WLQ, SF-36, ASQoL, BASFI, BASDAI, HAQ-S, and SRQ-20 instruments. Correlations between loss of productivity at work, worse quality of life, presence of emotional disturbances, and worse health conditions were positive. The process of translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the SPS-6 as a generic measurement for the loss of productivity at work and of the AS-WIS as a specific measurement for patients with AS are valid, reproducible, and specific instruments to be used in Brazil. In both scales, productivity at work was associated to advanced age, higher rate of absenteeism in the last month and year, presence of peripheral arthritis, and a larger number of comorbidities in patients with AS. The AS-WIS and SPS-6 showed a good correlation among them although they are not mutually exclusive but supplementary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Burton WN, Pransky G, Conti DJ, Chen CY, Edington DW (2004) The association of medical conditions and presenteeism. J Occup Environ Med 46(6 Suppl):S38–S45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. De Soárez PC, Kowalski CCG, Ferraz MB, Ciconelli RM (2007) Translation into Brazilian Portuguese and validation of the Work Limitations Questionnaire. Rev Panam Salud Publica 22(1):21–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goetzel RZ, Long SR, Ozminkowski RJ, Hawkins K, Wang S, Lynch WD (2004) Health, Absence, disability, and presenteeism cost estimates of certain physical and mental health conditions affecting US employers. J Occup Environ Med 46(4):398–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hemp P (2004) Presenteeism: at work-but out of it. Harv Bus Rev 82(10):49–58

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cyr A, Hagen S (2007) Measurement and quantification of presenteeism. JOEM 49(12):1299–1301

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ciconelli RM, De Soárez PC, Kowalski CCG, Ferraz MB (2006) The Brazilian Portuguese version of the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: General Health (WPAI-GH) Questionnaire. Sao Paulo Med J 124(6):325–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Streiner DL, Norman GR (1995) Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  8. van der Linden SM, Valkenburg HA, Cats A (1984) Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis: a proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 27(4):361–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Koopman C, Pelletier KR, Murray JF, Sharda CE, Berger ML, Turpin RS, Hackleman P, Gibson P, Holmes DM, Bendel T (2002) Stanford presenteeism scale: health status and employee productivity. J Occup Environ Med 44(1):14–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gilworth G, Emery P, Barkham N, Smyth MG, Helliwell P, Tennant A (2009) Reducing work disability in Ankylosing Spondylitis: development of a work instability scale for AS. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10(68):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boonen A, van der Linden SM (2002) The burden of ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 33:4–11

    Google Scholar 

  12. Torres TM, Ciconelli RM (2006) Instrumentos de avaliação em espondilite anquilosante. Rev Bras Reumatol 46:52–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gilworth G, Chamberlain A, Harvey A, Woodhouse A, Smith J, Smyth MG et al (2003) Development of a work instability scale for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 49:349–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25(24):3186–3191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ciconelli RM, Ferraz MB, Santos W, Meinão I, Quaresma MR (1999) Tradução para a língua portuguesa e validação do questionário genérico de avaliação de qualidade de vida SF-36 (Brasil SF-36). Rev Bras Reumatol 39(3):143–150

    Google Scholar 

  16. Santos KO, Araújo TM, Oliveira NF (2009) Estrutura fatorial e consistência interna do Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20) em população urbana. Cad Saúde Pública 25(1):214–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cusmanich KG (2006) Validação para a língua portuguesa dos instrumentos de avaliação de índice funcional e índice de atividade de doença em pacientes com espondilite anquilosante (BASDAI). [dissertação]. Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shinjo SK, Goncalves R, Kowalski S, Goncalves CR (2007) Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire for Spondyloarthropathies (HAQ-S) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation. Clin Rheumatol 26:1254–1258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ramos-Remus C, Hernandez-Rios G, Duran-Barragan S, Sanchez-Ortiz A, Aceves-Avila FJ, Castillo-Ortiz JD, Gonzalez-Perez O (2011) Fifteen-year trends of long-term disability and sick leaves in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol 30(3):361–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ward MM (2002) Predictors of the progression of functional disability in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 29(7):1420–1425

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gallinaro AL, Ventura C, Barros PDS, Goncalves CR (2010) Espondiloartrites: análise de uma série Brasileira comparada a uma grande casuística Ibero-Americana (estudo RESPONDIA). Rev Bras Reumatol 50(5):581–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Boonen A, Chorus A, Miedema H, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Schouten H, van der Tempel H, van der Linden S (2001) Withdrawal from labour force due to work disability in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 60:1033–1039

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ferreira AI, Martinez LF, Sousa LM, Cunha JV (2010) Tradução e validação para a língua portuguesa das escalas de presentismo WLQ-8 e SPS-6. 9(2): 253–266

  24. Lofland JH, Pizzi L, Frick KD (2004) A review of health-related workplace productivity loss instruments. Pharmacoeconomics 22(3):165–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pelletier K, Koopman C (2003) Bringing health to the bottom line. In: Business and Health. http://managedhealthcareexecutive.modernmedicine.com/mhe/article/articleDetail.jsp?id = 134250. Accessed 10 Feb 2013

  26. Shamansky SL (2002) Presenteeism…or when being there is not being there. Public Health Nurs 19(2):79–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pinheiro MM, Ciconelli RM, Martini LA, Ferraz MB (2009) Clinical risk factors for osteoporotic fractures in Brazilian women and men: the Brazilian Osteoporosis Study (BRAZOS). Osteoporos Int 20(3):399–408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Maksymowych WP, Gooch KL, Wong RL, Kupper H, van der Heijde D (2010) Impact of age, sex, physical function, health-related quality of life, and treatment with adalimumab on work status and work productivity of patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 37(2):5–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Listing J, Brandt J, Rudwaleit M, Zink A, Sieper J, Braun J (2004) Impact of anti-tumour necrosis factor α treatment on admissions to hospital and days of sick leave in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 63:1670–1672

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo de Medeiros Pinheiro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frauendorf, R., de Medeiros Pinheiro, M. & Ciconelli, R.M. Translation into Brazilian Portuguese, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Stanford presenteeism scale-6 and work instability scale for ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol 33, 1751–1757 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-013-2429-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-013-2429-6

Keywords

Navigation