Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Well-being outcomes of chiropractic intervention for lower back pain: a systematic review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The usefulness of chiropractic for treatment of low back pain is a contentious issue. Chiropractors advocate holism and general well-being as a key principle on which they base their clinical practice, yet the quality of life, lifestyle, health and economic impacts of chiropractic intervention for back pain in adults have rarely been investigated. This article provides an overview of chiropractic principles and practices, together with the results of a systematic review of peer-reviewed publications between 2000 and 2010 retrieved from MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, AMED and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. This review sought to determine the benefits of chiropractic treatment and care to well-being, and to what extent chiropractic treatment and care improve quality of life. Of 1,165 articles, 12 articles were retained, representing six studies (four randomised controlled trial, two observational) of varying quality. There was a high degree of inconsistency and lack of standardisation in measurement instruments and outcome measures. Three studies reported reduced use of other/extra treatments as a positive outcome; two studies reported a positive effect of chiropractic intervention on pain, and two studies reported a positive effect on disability. The six studies reviewed concentrated on the impact of chiropractic care on physical health and disability, rather than the wider holistic view which was the focus of this study. It is difficult, therefore, to defend any conclusion about the impact of chiropractic intervention on the quality of life, lifestyle, health and economic impact on chiropractic patients presenting with back pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ernst E, Posadzki P (2011) An independent review of NCCAM-funded studies of chiropractic. Clin Rheumatol 30:593–600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ernst E, Pittler M, Wider B, Boddy K (2007) Complementary therapies for back pain: is the evidence getting stronger? Clin Rheumatol 26:736–738

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ernst E (2009) Chiropractic treatment for fibromyalgia: a systematic review. Clin Rheumatol 28:1175–1178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Keating J (2005) Philosophy in chiropractic. In: Haldeman S (ed) Principles and practice in chiropractic, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bolton P (1985) Chiropractic and rheumatism. J Chiropr Assoc Aust 16(1):19–22

    Google Scholar 

  6. Breen A (1977) Chiropractors and the treatment of back pain. Rheumatol Rehabil 16:46–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Phillips R, Butler R (1982) Survey of chiropractic in Dade County Florida. J Manip Physiol Ther 5:83–89

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ebrill P (1993) A descriptive report of the case-mix within Australian chiropractic practice in 1992. Chiropr J Aust 23(4):122–126

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ailliet L, Rubenstein S, de Vet H (2010) Characteristics of chiropractors and their patients in Belgium. J Manip Physiol Ther 33:618–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coulter I, Hurwitz E, Adams A, Genovese B, Hays R, Shekelle P (2002) Patients using chiropractors in North America: who are they, and why are they in chiropractic care? Spine 27(3):291–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mootz R, Cherkin D, Odegard C, Eisenberg D, Barassi J, Deyo R (2005) Characteristics of chiropractic practitioners, patients, and encounters in Massachusetts and Arizona. J Manip Physiol Ther 28:648–653

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ernst E, Gilbey A (2010) Chiropractic claims in the English-speaking world. J N Z Med Assoc 123(1312):36–44

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leboeuf-Yde C, Pedersen E, Bryner P, Cosman D, Hayek R, Meeker W, Shail J, Terrazas O, Tucker J, Walsh M (2005) Self-reported non-musculoskeletal responses to chiropractic intervention: a multination survey. J Manip Physiol Ther 28:294–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rupert R (2000) A survey of practice patterns and the health promotion and prevention attitudes of US chiropractors. Maintenance care: part 1. J Manip Physiol Ther 23(1):1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Blum C, Globe G, Terre L, Mirtz T, Greene L, Globe D (2008) Multinational survey of chiropractic patients: reasons for seeking care. J Can Chiropr Assoc 52(3):175–184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. World Health Organisation (WHO) (2012) Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organisation as adopted by the International Health Conference. 19th June - 22nd July 1946, signed on 22 July 1946 by the Representatives of the 61 States, and entered into force on the 7 April 1948. World Health Organisation (WHO), New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Michaleff Z, Lin A, Maher C, van Tulder M (2012) Spinal manipulation epidemiology: systematic review of cost effectiveness studies. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 22:655–662. doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.02.011

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ernst E (2005) The complexity of complementary medicine: chiropractic for back pain. Clin Rheumatol 24:445–446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Busse J, Jacobs C, Ngo T, Rodine R, Torrance D, Jim J, Kulkarni A, Petrisor B, Drew B, Bhandari M (2009) Attitudes towards chiropractic. A survey of North American orthopaedic surgeons. Spine 34:2818–2825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Busse J, Jim J, Jacobs C, Ngo T, Rodine R, Torrance D, Kulkarni A, Petrisor B, Drew B, Bhandari M (2011) Attitudes towards chiropractic: an analysis of written comments from a survey of North American orthopaedic surgeons. Chiropr Man Ther 19:25. doi:10.1186/2045-709X-19-25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Coulter I (1991) An institutional philosophy of chiropractic. Chiropr J Aust 21:136–142

    Google Scholar 

  22. Phillips R, Gatteman M (2005) Chiropractic paradigms. In: Gatterman M (ed) Foundations of chiropractic subluxation, 2nd edn. Elsevier Mosby, St Louis, pp 19–29

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rubenstein S, van Middelkoop M, Assendelft W, de Boer M, van Tulder M (2011) Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain. Art no. CD008112(2). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD008112. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008112.pub2

  24. Walker B, French S, Grant W, Green S (2010) Combined chiropractic interventions for low-back pain. Art no. CD005427(4). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD005427. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005427.pub2

  25. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. McLeroy K, Northridge M, Balcazar H, Greenberg M, Landers S (2012) Commentary. Reporting guidelines and the American Journal of Public Health’s adoption of preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Am J Public Health 102(5):780–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Higgins J, Green S (2006) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.6 (Online) Cochrane Collaboration. (Available from http://www.cochrane.org/resources/handbook/hbook.htm)

  28. Descarreaux M, Blouin J, Drolet M, Padadimitriou S, Teasdale N (2004) Efficacy of preventative spinal manipulation for chronic low-back pain and related disabilities: a preliminary study. J Manip Physiol Ther 8:509–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hertzman-Miller R, Morgenstern H, Hurwitz E, Yu F, Adams A, Harber P, Kominski G (2002) Comparing the satisfaction of low-back pain patients randomized to receive medical or chiropractic care: results from the UCLA low-back pain study. Am J Public Health 92(10):1628–1633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wilkey A, Gregory M, Byfield D, McCarthy P (2008) A comparison between chiropractic management and pain clinic management for chronic low-back pain in a national health service outpatient clinic. J Altern Complement Med 14(5):465–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hawk N, Long C, Rowell R, Gudavalli M, Jedlicka J (2005) A randomised trial investigating a chiropractic manual placebo: a novel design using standardized forces in the delivery of active and control treatments. J Altern Complement Med 11(1):109–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Giles L, Muller R, Winter G (2003) Patient satisfaction, characteristics, radiology, and complications associated with attending a specialized government-funded multidisciplinary spinal pain unit. J Manip Physiol Ther 26(5):293–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Langworthy J, Breen A (2007) Psychosocial factors and their predictive value in chiropractic patients with low back pain: a prospective inception cohort study. Chiropr Osteopat 15(5):doi:10.1186/1746-1340-15-5

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hurwitz E, Morgenstern H, Vassilaki M, Chiang L (2005) Frequency and clinical predictors of adverse reactions to chiropractic care in the UCLA neck pain study. Spine 30(13):1477–1484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kominski G, Heslin K, Morgenstern H, Hurwitz E, Harber P (2005) Economic evaluation of four treatments for low-back pain: results from a randomised controlled trial. Med Care 43(5):428–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Deyo R, Battie M, Beurkens A, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, Malmavaara A, Roland M, Von Korff M, Waddell G (1998) Outcome measures for low back pain research: a proposal for standardised use. Spine 23(18):2003–2013

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of low-back pain: part 1. Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine 8:141–144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Eisenberg DM, Kessler RC, Van Rompay MI, Kaptchuk TJ, Wilkey SA, Appel S, Davis RB (2001) Perceptions about complementary therapies relative to conventional therapies among adults who use both: results from a national survey. Ann Intern Med 135(5):344–351

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hurwitz E, Morgenstern H, Kominski G, Yu F, Chiang L (2006) A randomized trial of chiropractic and medical care for patients with low back pain: eighteen-month follow-up outcomes from the UCLA low back pain study. Spine 31:611–621. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000202559.41193.b2

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wewers ME, Lowe NK (1990) A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Heal 13(4):227–236. doi:10.1002/nur.4770130405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. The Medical Research Council Cognitive Function Ageing Study (2000) Survey into health problems of elderly people: a comparison of self-report with proxy information. Int J Epidemiol 29(4):684–697. doi:10.1093/ije/29.4.684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kovacs FM, Abraira V, Zamora J, del Real MT G, Llobera J, Fernández C, Group TK-AP (2004) Correlation between pain, disability, and quality of life in patients with common low back pain. Spine 29(2):206–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ware JEJ, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

All researchers in the Faculty of Health at the University of Newcastle are members of the Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI). We acknowledge Elodie Sprenger, Research Centre for Gender Health and Ageing, University of Newcastle, for assistance with literature searches and article retrieval, and Cassie Curryer, Research Centre for Gender Health and Ageing, University of Newcastle, for assistance with editing and manuscript preparation.

Disclosures

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynne Parkinson.

Appendix 1: final search terms and strategy

Appendix 1: final search terms and strategy

Search terms:

A: Back pain

  • General terms

    1. 1.

      back pain.mp. or exp Back Pain/

    2. 2.

      back injuries.mp. or exp Lumbar Vertebrae/ or exp Back Injuries/

    3. 3.

      exp Low Back Pain/ or low* back pain.mp.

    4. 4.

      lumbar pain.mp.

    5. 5.

      dorsalgia.mp.

    6. 6.

      lumbago.mp.

    7. 7.

      backache.mp.

    8. 8.

      exp Spinal Diseases/ or chronic back pain.mp.

    9. 9.

      exp Pain, Intractable/ or intractable back pain.mp.

    10. 10.

      spin* pain.mp.

    11. 11.

      acute back pain.mp.

    12. 12.

      back trauma.mp.

    13. 13.

      referred back pain.mp.

  • Specific causes of back pain and related terms

    1. 1.

      sciatica.mp. or exp Sciatica/

    2. 2.

      exp Cervical Vertebrae/ or spinal injur*.mp.

    3. 3.

      exp Intervertebral Disk Displacement/ or exp Intervertebral Disk/ or slipped disc.mp. or exp Spondylolisthesis/

    4. 4.

      slipped disk.mp.

    5. 5.

      exp Thoracic Vertebrae/ or disc protrusion.mp.

    6. 6.

      exp Spinal Stenosis/ or disk protrusion.mp.

    7. 7.

      disc extrusion.mp. or exp Spinal Cord Compression/

    8. 8.

      disk extrusion.mp.

    9. 9.

      hernia* disc.mp. or exp Lumbosacral Region/

    10. 10.

      hernia* disk.mp.

    11. 11.

      prolapse* disc.mp.

    12. 12.

      prolapse* disk.mp.

    13. 13.

      rupture* disc.mp. or exp Spinal Fractures/

    14. 14.

      rupture* disk.mp.

    15. 15.

      spin* degeneration.mp.

    16. 16.

      dis* degeneration.mp.

    17. 17.

      bulging disc.mp.

    18. 18.

      bulging disk.mp.

    19. 19.

      spondylosis.mp. or exp Spondylosis/ or exp Spinal Cord Diseases/

    20. 20.

      spondylolysis.mp. or exp Spondylolysis/

    21. 21.

      discitis.mp. or exp Discitis/

    22. 22.

      diskitis.mp.

    23. 23.

      compression fracture.mp. or exp Fractures, Compression/

    24. 24.

      ischialgia.mp.

    25. 25.

      sciatic nerve.mp. or exp Sciatic Nerve/

    26. 26.

      exp Arthritis/ or exp Arthritis, Rheumatoid/ or arthritis.mp.

    27. 27.

      exp Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/ or exp Osteoporosis/ or osteoporosis.mp.

    28. 28.

      skeletal irregularities.mp.

    29. 29.

      exp Inflammation/ or inflammatory disease*.mp.

    30. 30.

      cancer.mp.

    31. 31.

      exp Rheumatic Diseases/ or exp Spondylitis, Ankylosing/ or ankylosing spondylitis.mp.

B: Quality of life

  1. 1.

    exp ‘Quality of Life’/ or health related quality of life.mp.

  2. 2.

    exp Morbidity/ or disease burden.mp.

  3. 3.

    mental health.mp. or exp Mental Health/

  4. 4.

    exp ‘Activities of Daily Living’/ or physical function*.mp.

  5. 5.

    social function*.mp.

  6. 6.

    vitality.mp.

  7. 7.

    emotional function*.mp.

  8. 8.

    bodily pain.mp.

  9. 9.

    general health.mp.

  10. 10.

    health status.mp. or exp Health Status/

  11. 11.

    disability.mp.

C: Lifestyle

  1. 1.

    exp Diet/ or diet.mp.

  2. 2.

    nutrition.mp.

  3. 3.

    exp Exercise/ or exercise.mp.

  4. 4.

    physical activity.mp. or exp Motor Activity/

  5. 5.

    over?weight.mp. or exp Overweight/ or exp Body Weight/

  6. 6.

    exp Obesity/ or exp Obesity, Morbid/ or exp Obesity, Abdominal/ or obesity.mp.

  7. 7.

    manual occupation.mp.

  8. 8.

    exp Occupational Exposure/ or exp Occupational Diseases/ or occupational disease*.mp.

  9. 9.

    posture.mp. or exp Posture/

  10. 10.

    sedentary lifestyle.mp. or exp Sedentary Lifestyle/ or exp Physical Exertion/ or exp Health Behavior/

  11. 11.

    physical fitness.mp. or exp Physical Fitness/

  12. 12.

    health behavio?r.mp.

  13. 13.

    lifestyle.mp. or exp Life Style/

  14. 14.

    physically strenuous work.mp.

  15. 15.

    satisfaction with life.mp.

  16. 16.

    social interaction.mp. or exp Interpersonal Relations/

  17. 17.

    family interaction.mp. or exp Social Adjustment/

  18. 18.

    activity participation.mp.

  19. 19.

    role performance.mp.

D: Health

  1. 1.

    exp Glucocorticoids/ or corticosteroid*.mp.

  2. 2.

    health outcome.mp.

  3. 3.

    headache.mp. or exp Headache/

  4. 4.

    pharmaceutical consumption.mp.

  5. 5.

    medicine consumption.mp.

  6. 6.

    medication consumption.mp.

  7. 7.

    drug utilisation.mp.

  8. 8.

    drug utilization.mp. or exp Drug Utilization/

  9. 9.

    co?morbid disease.mp. or exp Comorbidity/

  10. 10.

    exp Chronic Disease/ or chronic disease*.mp.

  11. 11.

    co?morbid condition*.mp.

  12. 12.

    cortisone.mp. or exp Cortisone/

E: Economic

  1. 1.

    economics.mp. or exp Economics/

  2. 2.

    health?care costs.mp. or exp Health Care Costs/

  3. 3.

    exp Health Expenditures/ or health?care expenditure.mp.

  4. 4.

    ‘Costs and Cost Analysis’/ or economic costs.mp. or exp ‘Cost of Illness’/

  5. 5.

    economic burden.mp.

  6. 6.

    indirect cost*.mp.

  7. 7.

    direct cost*.mp.

  8. 8.

    treatment cost*.mp.

  9. 9.

    exp Cost-Benefit Analysis/ or rehabilitation cost*.mp.

  10. 10.

    productivity loss.mp.

  11. 11.

    loss of earning*.mp.

  12. 12.

    loss of income.mp.

  13. 13.

    exp Drug Costs/ or pharmaceutical cost*.mp.

F: Chiropractic intervention

  1. 1.

    spin* manipulation.mp.

  2. 2.

    exp Manipulation, Chiropractic/ or exp Chiropractic/ or chiropractic.mp.

  3. 3.

    manual therapy.mp. or exp Musculoskeletal Manipulations/

  4. 4.

    chiropractic manipulation.mp.

  5. 5.

    manual therapies.mp.

  6. 6.

    manipulative therapy.mp.

  7. 7.

    manipulative therapies.mp.

  8. 8.

    exp Manipulation, Spinal/ or spinal manipulation therapy.mp.

  9. 9.

    mobilisation treatment.mp.

  10. 10.

    mobilization treatment.mp.

  11. 11.

    spin* adjustment.mp.

  12. 12.

    exp Complementary Therapies/ or complimentary therapies.mp.

  13. 13.

    complimentary therapy.mp.

  14. 14.

    alternative therapies.mp.

  15. 15.

    alternative therapy.mp.

  16. 16.

    alternative treatment*.mp.

  17. 17.

    complimentary treatment*.mp.

  18. 18.

    exp Physical Therapy Modalities/ or physical therapy.mp.

  19. 19.

    physical therapies.mp.

  20. 20.

    exp Complementary Therapies/ or complimentary therapies.mp. AND treatment outcome.mp. or exp Treatment Outcome/

  21. 21.

    exp Physical Therapy Modalities/ or physical therapy.mp. AND treatment outcome.mp. or exp Treatment Outcome/

  22. 22.

    alternative therapies.mp. AND treatment outcome.mp. or exp Treatment Outcome/

  23. 23.

    exp Manipulation, Chiropractic/ or exp Chiropractic/ or chiropractic.mp. AND treatment outcome.mp. or exp Treatment Outcome/

Search strategy: Back pain (general and specific) and quality of life, health economic and lifestyle impacts of chiropractic intervention (i.e. A + [B or C or D or E] + F).

Limits: English language; human; years 2000–2010; aged 18 and over; country of origin (Australia, USA, Canada, England, Denmark).

Exclusion criteria: Interventions that focus only on neck pain, chiropractic interventions performed by other healthcare professionals (e.g. physiotherapist, osteopath). These will be manually excluded at abstract cull stage.

Databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, AMED, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parkinson, L., Sibbritt, D., Bolton, P. et al. Well-being outcomes of chiropractic intervention for lower back pain: a systematic review. Clin Rheumatol 32, 167–180 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-012-2116-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-012-2116-z

Keywords

Navigation