Validity and reliability of the Persian versions of WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index and Lequesne Algofunctional Index
- 590 Downloads
The WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index and Lequesne Algofunctional Index have not been translated and validated for Iranian patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip. The aim of this study was to validate the Persian form of WOMAC OA Index and Lequesne Algofunctional Index and to assess their test–retest reliability and convergent validity. Forward/backward translations and consensus panels were conducted to obtain the Persian versions of WOMAC OA Index and Lequesne Algofunctional Index. A non-probability sample of 116 patients with knee/hip osteoarthritis was asked to complete the WOMAC OA Index and Lequesne Algofunctional Index as well as Medical Outcomes Study—20-Item Short Form (SF-20) questionnaires, a visual analogue scales (VAS) of pain and demographic information form. Internal consistency (using Cronbach’s alpha) and convergent validity (by examining the Pearson’s correlation coefficients) were evaluated to determine the psychometric properties of the questionnaires. In order to evaluate test–retest reliability, 20 randomly selected patients completed the questionnaires, on a second occasion, 7–10 days later. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients for the WOMAC OA Index and Algofunctional Index subscales ranged from 0.63 to 0.94 and from 0.53 to 0.96, respectively. Statistically significant correlations were found between WOMAC OA Index, Algofunctional Index and SF-20 subscales and VAS for pain. The Persian version of WOMAC demonstrated a more acceptable validity, internal consistency and reliability compared with the Lequesne Algofunctional Index. However, both indices are valid and reliable instruments for evaluating the OA severity of knee/hip in Iran.
KeywordsHealth status Lequesne Algofunctional Index Medical Outcomes Study—20-Item Short Form (SF-20) Osteoarthritis WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index
We thank all OA patients who participated in the study.
Prof. Nicholas Bellamy is the registered copyright and trademark holder of the WOMAC Index.
- 2.Arden N, Cooper C (2006) Osteoarthritis handbook. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 6.Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Bellamy N (2008) Principles of outcome assessment. In: Hochberg MC, Silman AJ, Smolen JS, Weinblatt ME, Weisman MH (eds) Rheumatology, 4th edn. Mosby Elsevier, Spain, pp 12–20Google Scholar
- 12.Bellamy N. WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index. Available at: http://www.womac.org/womac/index.htm#asiapacific. Access date: 2/11/2011
- 13.Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K et al (1986) Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum 29:1039–1049PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Bellamy N (2003) WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index user guide IX. Brisbane, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- 20.Stewart AL, Sherbourne CD, Hays RD et al (1992) Developing and testing the MOS 20-Item Short-Form Survey: a general population application in measuring functioning and wellbeing. In: Stewart AL, Ware JE Jr (eds) The medical outcome study approach. Dule University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
- 21.Stewart AL, Ware JE, Brook RH (1982) Construction and scoring of aggregate functional status measures, vol 1. Rand Corp, Santa Monica, Publication no. R2551-I-HHSGoogle Scholar
- 23.Aalto AM, Aro S, Ohinmma A, Aro AR, Mähönen M (1997) The validation of the SF-20 instrument for health related quality of life in the Finnish general population. STAKES, National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health. 37/1997, Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
- 24.Hanninen J, Takala J, Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi S (1998) Quality of life in NIDDM patients assessed with the SF-20 questionnaire. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 42:17–27Google Scholar
- 29.Guermazi M, Poiraudeau S, Yahia M, Mezganni M, Fermanian J, Elleuch MH, Revel M (2004) Translation, adaptation and validation of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) for an Arab population: the Sfax modified WOMAC. Osteoarthr Cartil 12:459–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Stucki G, Sangha O, Stucki S, Michel BA, Tyndall A, Dick W, Theiler R (1998) Comparison of the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) Osteoarthritis Index and a self-report format of the self-administered Lequesne-Algofunctional Index in patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 6:79–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Salaffi F, Leardini G, Canesi B, Mannoni A, Fioravanti A, Caporali R, Lapadula G, Punzi L (2003) Reliability and validity of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index in Italian patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthr Cartil 11:551–560PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar