Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What are we doing about septic arthritis? A survey of UK-based rheumatologists and orthopedic surgeons

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to determine the current practices and beliefs of United Kingdom (UK)-based rheumatologists and orthopedic surgeons (OS) in managing septic arthritis (SA) and to determine awareness levels of national guidance. Two-hundred OS and 200 rheumatologists were sent a link to a web-based survey tool via email. Questions posed related to the management of SA, including the respondent’s views on antibiotic therapy, joint drainage, which specialty should manage these cases, and also the clinician’s evidence base. There were 354 functioning addresses with 182 responses (51%). One hundred fifty-one (77 OS, 74 rheumatologists) (43%) responses were complete and included for analysis. Eighty percent of rheumatologists and 82% of OS recommended 6-weeks total antibiotic therapy. Seventy-three percent in each group recommended 1–2 weeks intravenous therapy initially followed by oral continuation therapy. In patients at risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), 25% rheumatologists and 14% OS would ensure MRSA cover. Seventy-seven percent of rheumatologists and 66% of OS recommended surgical joint drainage; 22% and 27%, respectively, recommended repeated closed needle aspiration as their chosen method of joint drainage. Sixty-six percent of rheumatologists and 65% of OS believed OS should manage SA. Twenty-three percent of rheumatologists and 22% of OS quoted published guidance as their main evidence base in the treatment of SA. Only 24% of rheumatologists and 34% of OS quoted British Society of Rheumatology (BSR) guidance when asked if they were aware of any guidelines. Views of rheumatologists and OS are not that dissimilar in managing SA. Surprisingly, rheumatologists are more aggressive regarding the recommendation for surgical joint drainage. Within both groups, significant variation in management principles exists often discrepant to recommendations laid out by the BSR. There are poor awareness levels of the BSR guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gupta MN, Sturrock RD, Field M (2001) A prospective 2-year study of 75 patients with adult-onset septic arthritis. Rheumatol (Oxf) 40:24–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mathews JM, Weston VC, Jones A, Field M, Coakley G (2010) Bacterial septic arthritis in adults. Lancet 375:846–855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Coakley G, Mathews C, Field M et al (2006) BSR & BHPR, BOA, RCGP and BSAC guidelines for management of the hot swollen joint in adults. Rheumatol (Oxf) 45:1039–1041

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brannan SR, Jerrard DA (2006) Synovial fluid analysis. J Emerg Med 30:331–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ryan Finley. http://www.SurveyMonkey.com, Portland, OR, USA

  6. Frazee BW, Fee C, Lambert L (2009) How common is MRSA in adult septic arthritis. Ann Emerg Med 54:695–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ross JJ, Davidson L (2005) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus septic arthritis: an emerging clinical syndrome. Rheumatol (Oxf) 44:1197–1198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ravindran V, Logan I, Bourke BE (2009) Medical vs surgical management for the native joint in septic arthritis: a 6-year, single UK academic centre experience. Rheumatol (Oxf) 48:1320–1322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldenberg DL, Brandt KD, Cohen AS, Cathcart ES (1975) Treatment of septic arthritis: comparison of needle aspiration and surgery as initial modes of joint drainage. Arthritis Rheum 18:83–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Weston VC, Jones AC, Bradbury N, Fawthrop F, Doherty M (1999) Clinical features and outcome of septic arthritis in a single UK Health District 1982–1991. Ann Rheum Dis 58:214–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cooper C, Cawley MI (1986) Bacterial Arthritis in an English health district: a 10 year review. Ann Rheum Dis 45:458–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sammer DM, Shin AY (2009) Comparison of arthroscopic and open treatment of septic arthritis of the wrist. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:1387–1393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ravindran V, Logan I, Bourke BE (2008) Septic arthritis: clinical audits would help optimise the management. Clin Rheumatol 27:1565–1567

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Al-Mossawi M (2010) Clinical audit of the management of suspected septic arthritis in the emergency department. Rheumatol (Oxf) 49(Suppl 1):i67

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lim CSE, Low ST, Joshi N, Walton T (2010) Acute monoarthritis: a clinical audit in a district general hospital. Rheumatol (Oxf) 49(Suppl 1):i73

    Google Scholar 

  16. Menezes BF, Cooke RP, Estrach C et al (2010) A “hot joint pack” improves the management of the acute hot joint. Rheumatol (Oxf) 48(Suppl 1):i113

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shahbaz-Samavi M (2009) An audit of adults with hot swollen joints presenting to Salford Royal Accident and Emergency Department. Rheumatol (Oxf) 48(Suppl 1):i150

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wong Y, Morgan G, Young L (2009) Management of septic arthritis at a UK district general hospital. Rheumatol (Oxf) 48(Suppl 1):i153

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Usman Butt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Butt, U., Amissah-Arthur, M., Khattak, F. et al. What are we doing about septic arthritis? A survey of UK-based rheumatologists and orthopedic surgeons. Clin Rheumatol 30, 707–710 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-010-1672-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-010-1672-3

Keywords

Navigation