Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative study on low back pain misdiagnosed as spondyloarthropathy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to investigate features of different diseases with low back pain misdiagnosed as spondyloarthropathy so as to improve the accuracy of diagnosis for spondyloarthropathy. The clinical and laboratory data of 24 cases misdiagnosed as spondyloarthropathy in recent 3 years were comparatively and retrospectively analyzed. The diagnostic accuracy of the European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group (ESSG) criteria, Amor criteria, and the combination of them in these misdiagnosed cases was also analyzed. The final diagnoses of these 24 cases were listed below: four malignant tumors (retroperitoneal adipose sarcoma, advanced gastric carcinoma, ovarian papillary epithelioma, acute lymphocytic leukemia), six benign tumors (two parathyroid adenoma with hyperparathyroidism, one intraspinal lipoma, intraspinal ependymomas, sacral tubulocyst, and intraspinal schwannoglioma, respectively). The other 14 cases included fibromyalgia syndrome (3), osteitis condensans (3), diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (2), lumbar intervertebral disk protrusion (1), congenital scoliosis (1), Wilson’s disease (1), ochronosis (1), Fanconi syndrome (1) and hypophosphatemic rachiopathy (1). Among patients with tumor, all except three patients had persistent low back pain without morning stiffness, which aggravated at night and could not be relieved by rest or exercise. The symptoms could not be relieved by administration of multiple nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Eleven patients had inflammatory low back pain defined by Calin. Of the total misdiagnosed cases, 54.17–83.33% could be prevented by application of ESSG criteria or Amor criteria, or a combination of them. From the data, we could see that the clinical features of different diseases with low back pain were different from each other and from those of spondyloarthropathy. The various criteria for spondyloarthropathy may be more effective in combination, along with other clinical information like these clinical features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dougados M, van der Linden S, Juhlin R et al (1991) The European Spondylarthropathy Study Group preliminary criteria for the classification of spondylarthropathy. Arthritis Rheum 34:1218–1227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Amor B, Dougados M, Mijiawa M et al (1990) Criteria of classification of SpA. Rev Rheum 57:85–89

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Calin A (1986) Seronegative spondyloarthritides. Med Clin North Am 70:323–336

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Deyo RA, Weinstein JN (2001) Low back pain. New Engl J Med 344:363–370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Naschitz JE, Yeshurun D, Rosner I (1995) Rheumatic manifestations of occult cancer. Cancer 75:2954–2958

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Deyo RA (1986) Early diagnostic evaluation of low back pain. J Gen Intern Med 1:328–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Atlas SJ, Chang Y, Kammann E et al (2000) Long-term disability and return to work among patients who have a herniated lumbar disc: the effect of disability compensation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:4–15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Andersson GBJ (1999) Epidemiologic features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet 354:581–585

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brewer GJ (2000) Recognition, diagnosis, and management of Wilson's disease. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 223:39–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Collantes E, Veroz R, Escudero A et al (2000) Can some cases of ‘possible’ SpA be classified as ‘definite’ or ‘undifferentiated’ SpA? Value of criteria for SpA. Spanish SpA Study Group. Joint Bone Spine 67:516–520

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Amor B (2000) Usefulness of criteria for SpA. Joint Bone Spine 67:502–503

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Khan MA et al (2004) How to diagnose axial spondylarthritis early. Ann Rheum Dis 63:535–543

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zeng QY (2000) Early diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis. Chin J Rheumatol 4:69–71

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sieper J, Rudwaleit M (2005) Early referral recommendations for ankylosing spondylitis (including pre-radiographic and radiographic forms) in primary care. Ann Rheum Dis 64:659–663

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rudwaleit M, Khan MA, Sieper J (2005) The challenge of diagnosis and classification in early ankylosing spondylitis: do we need new criteria? Arthritis Rheum 52:1000–1008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiang Yuan Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deng, X.L., Liu, X.Y. & Xu, N. Comparative study on low back pain misdiagnosed as spondyloarthropathy. Clin Rheumatol 28, 893–898 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-009-1198-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-009-1198-8

Keywords

Navigation