Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of the patient positioning during DXA measurements in daily clinical practice

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For prompt diagnosis of osteoporosis, properly instructed dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements are required. To get correct DXA results in addition to quality control procedures, proper positioning of specific body regions such as hip and spine should also be achieved. The aim of this study was to assess the accurateness of the patient positioning for hip and spine regions in daily clinical practice. Hip and spine scan images of 113 DXA reports were evaluated for whether or not the patient was positioned correctly. Out of 113 hip and spine DXA reports, 61 hips and 94 spines were found to have scan images with improper positions. The spine was not straight in 48.7% of the images. The 38.9% of the spinal images did not comprise both iliac crests, and 40.7% did not include T12 and L5 vertebrae. In hip DXA reports, 40.7% of the femoral shaft was deviated to one side. We found the ratio of invalid positions surprisingly very high. Although this may stem from local technical problems and may not reflect the overall quality of scans in other centers, such misinterpretations would definitely affect clinicians’ decisions in an inappropriate way. We suggest that relevant inconveniences should be kept in mind both by the clinicians and the technical staff for better production and prompt estimation of DXA measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Inoue D, Matsumoto T (2006) Medical treatment of osteoporosis. Nippon Rinsho 64:1633–1638

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lewiecki EM (2005) Clinical applications of bone density testing for osteoporosis. Minerva Med 96:317–330

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Syed Z, Khan A (2002) Bone densitometry: applications and limitations. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 24:476–484

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Prevrhal S (2006) Absorptiometry. Radiologe 46:847–860

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sinaki M (2000) Prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. In: Braddom RL (ed) Physical medicine and rehabilitation. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 894–912

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stevenson M, Lloyd Jones M, De Nigris E et al (2005) A systematic review and economic evaluation of alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, raloxifene and teriparatide for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Health Technol Assess 9:1–160

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sigurethsson G (2001) Diagnosis of osteoporosis in the elderly; an overview. Laeknabladid 87:15–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewiecki EM, Watts NB, McClung MR et al (2004) Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:3651–3655

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. The Writing Group for the ISCD Position Development Conference (2004) Position statement executive summary. J Clin Densitom 7:7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lewiecki E, Binkley N, Petak S (2006) DXA quality matters. J Clin Densitom 9:388–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Watts NB (2004) Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Osteoporos Int 15:847–854

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alp Çetin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Çetin, A., Özgüçlü, E., Özçakar, L. et al. Evaluation of the patient positioning during DXA measurements in daily clinical practice. Clin Rheumatol 27, 713–715 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-007-0773-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-007-0773-0

Keywords

Navigation