Skip to main content
Log in

High titres of IgM-antiphospholipid antibodies are unrelated to pathogenicity in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heterogeneity in the mechanisms of coagulation may contribute to an increased thrombotic risk for patients with malignancies. The coincidence of malignancies and antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) have been described in several important epidemiological studies. The pathological significance of aPL in patients with malignancies is, however, still unclear. In this study, we investigated the clinical manifestations of four patients with elevated IgM-aPL titres lying outside the region signifying 95% of normal cases and with a history of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The patients had elevated IgG- and IgM-anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and also tested positive for lupus anticoagulants. Other aPL were measured, and we found high positive results for all tested antibodies in three patients. The production of aPL, however, occurred in the absence of thrombotic complications. No thromboembolic manifestations occurred during the follow-up period either. It could also be demonstrated that the degree to which the aCL titre was elevated resembles the elevation of the non-classical antiphospholipid antibodies, but not that of β2-GP-1 or anti-annexin antibodies. Therefore, it can be postulated that these extremely high levels of IgM-aCL antibodies do not enhance the risk of thrombosis and may be completely different from aCL antibodies in an antiphospholipid syndrome patient population without malignancies. In particular, haematological and lymphoproliferative malignancies may indeed be associated with the generation of aPL, but do not necessarily enhance the thrombophilic risk in these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Wilson WA, Gharavi AE, Koike T et al (1999) International consensus statement on preliminary classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome: report of an international workshop. Arthritis Rheum 42:1309–1311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Asherson RA (2000) Antiphospholipid antibodies, malignancies and paraproteinemias. J Autoimmun 15:117–122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pusterla S, Previtali S, Marziali S et al (2004) Antiphospholipid antibodies in lymphoma: prevalence and clinical significance. Hematol J 5:341–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shoenfeld Y, Blank M, Sherer Y (2001) Induction and treatment of the antiphospholipid sydnrome—lessons from animal models. Eur J Clin Invest 31:736–740

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Harris EN, Pierangeli SS (2002) Revisiting the anticardiolipin test and its standardization. Lupus 11:269–275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brandt JT, Triplett DA, Alving B, Scharrer I (1995) Criteria for the diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants: an update. On behalf of the Subcommittee on Lupus Anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid Antibody of the Scientific and Standardisation Committee of the ISTH. Thromb Haemost 74:1185–1190

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Miesbach W, Matthias T, Scharrer I (2005) Identification of thrombin antibodies in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1050:250–256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Levine SR, Salowich-Palm L, Sawaya KL, Perry M, Spencer HJ, Winkler HJ, Alam Z, Carey JL (1997) IgG anticardiolipin antibody titer >40 GPL and the risk of subsequent thrombo-occlusive events and death. A prospective cohort study. Stroke 28:1660–1665

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Galli M, Luciani D, Bertolini G, Barbui T (2003) Lupus anticoagulants are stronger risk factors for thrombosis than anticardiolipin antibodies in the antiphospholipid syndrome: a systematic review of the literature. Blood 101:1827–1832

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shepshelovich D, Shoenfeld Y (2006) Prediction and prevention of autoimmune diseases: additional aspects of the mosaic of autoimmunity. Lupus 15(3):183–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lossos IS, Bogomolski-Yahalom V, Matzner Y (1998) Anticardiolipin antibodies in acute myeloid leukemia: prevalence and clinical significance. Am J Hematol 57:139–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schved JF, Dupuy-Fons C, Biron C et al (1994) A prospective epdimiological study of the occurrence of antiphospholipid antibody; the Montpelier Antiphospholipid (MAP) Study. Haemostasis 24:175–182

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Miesbach.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miesbach, W., Scharrer, I. & Asherson, R.A. High titres of IgM-antiphospholipid antibodies are unrelated to pathogenicity in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Clin Rheumatol 26, 95–97 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-006-0328-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-006-0328-9

Keywords

Navigation