Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Health-related quality of life in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: comparison of generic and disease-specific instruments

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Health-related quality of life (HRQL) assessment is receiving increased attention as an outcome measure in osteoarthritis (OA). The aims of the study were to assess the health status impact of hip and knee OA in the general older population and to compare the metric properties of the WOMAC disease-specific questionnaire (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) with generic measures [i.e., the Short Form 36 (SF-36) in patients with OA of the lower extremities]. This cross-sectional survey included a total of 244 patients (99 male, 145 female), aged 50 years and over, with symptomatic OA of the hips (107 patients) and knees (137 patients). All patients completed the WOMAC and the SF-36 questionnaires and were assessed for radiographic damage and for the presence of specific comorbid conditions. The overall impact on health was substantial for both groups of patients with OA of the lower extremities. The most striking impact was seen in OA of the hip for SF-36 “physical function” (p=0.03) and “physical role” (p=0.04), as well as WOMAC “physical function” (p=0.001). Furthermore, impairment of HRQL was only weakly associated with increasing radiographic changes. The SF-36 overall scores showed a better gradient with comorbidities than the WOMAC. This investigation has confirmed that WOMAC is the instrument of choice for evaluating patients with lower limb OA. For a more general insight into patient’s health and in particular cross-sectional studies of the elderly, where comorbidity is common, the SF-36 should also be used. This study also provides an estimate of the impact of OA of the hip and knee on HRQL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig.1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guccione AA, Felson DT, Anderson JJ, et al. (1994) The effects of specific medical conditions on the functional limitations of elders in the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health 84:351–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Saase JLCM, van Romunde LKJ, Cats A, Vandenbroucke JP, Valkenburg HA (1989) Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: Zoetermeer survey. Comparison of radiological osteoarthritis in a Dutch population with that in 10 other populations. Ann Rheum Dis 48:271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Felson DT, Naimark A, Anderson J, Kazis L, Castelli W, Meenan RF (1987) The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly. The Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Rheum 30:914–918

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Felson DT, Zhang Y (1998) An update on the epidemiology of knee and hip osteoarthritis with a view to prevention. Arthritis Rheum 41:1343–1355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Oliveria SA, Felson DT, Reed JI, Cirillo PA, Walker AM (1995) Incidence of symptomatic hand, hip, and knee osteoarthritis among patients in a health maintenance organization. Arthritis Rheum 38:1134–1341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Murray CJL, Lopez AD (1996) The global burden of disease. World Health Organisation, Geneva

  7. Davis MA, Ettinger WH, Neuhaus JM, Mallon KP (1991) Knee osteoarthritis and physical functioning: evidence from the NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study. J Rheumatol 18:591–598

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Martin J, Meltzer H, Elliot D (OPCS) surveys of disability in Great Britain. Report 1. The prevalence of disability among adults. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, Social Survey Division, HMSO, London

  9. Leardini G, Salaffi F, Montanelli R, Gertzeli S, Colangelo I, Canesi B (2001) A multicentric study of annual costs of knee osteoarthritis in Italy. Arthritis Rheum 44:S313

    Google Scholar 

  10. Salaffi F, Cavalieri F, Nolli M, Ferraccioli GF (1991) Analysis of disability in knee osteoarthritis. Relationship with age and psychological variables but not with radiographic score. J Rheumatol 18:1581–1586

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Minor MA, Hewett JE, Webel RR, Dreisinger TE, Kay DR (1988) Exercise tolerance and disease related measures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 15:905–911

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Philbin EF, Ries MD, Groff G, Sheesley KA, French TS, Pearson TA (1996) Osteoarthritis as a determinant of an adverse coronary heart disease risk profile. J Cardiovasc Risk 3:529–533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bellamy N (1995) Outcome measurement in osteoarthritis clinical trials. J Rheumatol 22 [Suppl 43]:49–51

    Google Scholar 

  14. Osteoarthritis Research Society (OARS) Task Force Report (1996) Design and conduct of clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis: recommendations from a task force on the Osteoarthritis Research Society. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 4:217–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lequesne M (1993) ILAR guidelines for testing slow acting drugs in osteoarthritis (SYSADOAs). Rev Esp Rheumatol 20 [Suppl 1]:220–221

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bellamy N, Kirwan J, Boers M, Brooks P, Strand V, Tugwell P, et al. (1997) Recommendations for a core set outcome measure for future phase III clinical trials in knee, hip and hand OA. Consensus development at OMERACT III. J Rheumatol 24:799–802

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Guyatt GH, Bombardier C, Tugwell PX (1986) Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials. CMAJ 134:889–895

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Testa MA, Simonson DC (1996) Assessment of quality of life outcomes. N Engl J Med 334:835–840

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). 1. Conceptual frame-work and item selection. Med Care 30:473–481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bergner N, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS (1981) The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 19:787–805

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hunt SM, McEven J, McKenna SP (1985) Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists. J R Coll Gen Pract 35:185–188

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hurst NP, Jobanputra P, Hunter M, Lambert M, Lochhead A, Brown H (1994) Validity of EuroQol: a generic health status instrument in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Economic and Health Outcomes Research Group. Br J Rheumatol 33:655–662

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stucki G, Liang MH, Phillips C, Katz JN (1995) The Short Form-36 is preferable to the SIP as a generic health status measure in patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res 8:174-181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Salaffi F, Stancati A, Carotti M (2002) Responsiveness of health status measures and utility-based methods in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 21:478–487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bellamy N, Watson Buchanan W, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or the knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Brazier JE, Harper R, Munro J, Walters SJ, Snaith ML (1999) Generic and condition-specific outcome measures for people with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology 38:870–877

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, et al. (1986) Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 29:1039–1049

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Altman R, Alarcon G, Appelrouth D, et al. (1991) The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification of osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis Rheum 34:505–514

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Salaffi F, Carotti M, Stancati A, Grassi W (2003) Radiographic assessment of osteoarthritis: analysis of disease progression. Aging Clin Exp Res 15:391–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–501

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Apolone G, Mosconi P (1998) The Italian SF-36 Health Survey: translation, validation and norming. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1025–1036

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1994) SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a user’s manual. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston

  33. Ware J, Kosinski M, Bayliss M, Rogers WH, Raczec A (1995) Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 Health Profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 33 [Suppl 4]:AS264–AS279

  34. Salaffi F, Leardini G, Canesi B, on behalf of Gonarthrosis and Quality Of Life Assessment (GOQOLA) Study Group (2003) Reliability and validity of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index in Italian patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 11:551–560

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Salaffi F, Stancati A, Silvestri CA, Ciapetti A, Grassi W Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain 8:283–291

  36. Hubert HB, Bloch DA, Fries JF (1993) Risk factors for physical disability in an aging cohort: the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. J Rheumatol 20:480–488

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Martin J, Meltzer H, Elliot D (1988) OPCS surveys of disability in Great Britain. Report 1. The prevalence of disability among adults. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, Social Survey Division, HMSO, London

  38. Silman AJ, Hochberg MC (1993) Osteoarthritis. In: Silman AJ, Hochberg MC (eds) Epidemiology of the rheumatic diseases. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 257–288

  39. Creamer P, Lethbridge-Cejku M, Hochberg MC (1998) Where does it hurt? Pain localization in osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 6:318–323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jordan J, Luta G, Renner J, Dragomir A, Hochberg M, Fryer J (1997) Knee pain and knee osteoarthritis severity in self-reported task-specific disability: The Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project. J Rheumatol 24:1344–1349

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Jordan JM, Shulamit LB, Callahan LF, Kincade JE, Konrad TR, De Friese GH (2000) Self-reported arthritis related disruptions in sleep and daily life and the use of medical, complementary and self-care strategies for arthritis. Arch Fam Med 9:143–149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Centers for Disease Control (2000) Health related quality of life among adults with arthritis—behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 11 States, 1996–1998. MMWR 49:366–369

    Google Scholar 

  43. Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Steiner W, Stucki G (2001) Responsiveness of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index as compared with the SF-36 in patients with osteoarthritis of the legs undergoing a comprehensive rehabilitation intervention. Ann Rheum Dis 60:834–840

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Fear J, Hillman M, Chamberlain MA, Tennant A (1997) Prevalence of hip problems in the population aged 55 years and over: access to specialist care and future demand for hip arthroplasty. Br J Rheumatol 36:74–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Roos EM, Klassbo M, Lohmander LS (1999) WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with arthroscopically assessed osteoarthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 28:210–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Salaffi F, Piva S, Barreca C, Cacace E, Ciancio G, Leardini G, on behalf of Gonarthrosis and Quality of Life (GOQUOLA) Study Group (2000) Validation of an Italian version of the arthritis impact measurement scales 2 (ITALIAN-AIMS2) for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology 39:720–726

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Rapp SR, Rejeski WJ, Miller ME (2000) Physical function among older adults with knee pain: the role of pain coping skills. Arthritis Care Res 13:270–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Dekker J, Boot B, van der Woude L, Bijlsma JWJ (1992) Pain and disability in osteoarthritis: a review of biobehavioral mechanisms. J Behav Med 15:189–214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Rheumatology, Ospedale A. Murri, University of Ancona, Via dei Colli, 52, 60035, Jesi (AN), Italy

    Fausto Salaffi & Walter Grassi

  2. Department of Radiology, University of Ancona, Ancona, Italy

    Marina Carotti

Authors
  1. Fausto Salaffi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marina Carotti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Walter Grassi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fausto Salaffi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salaffi, F., Carotti, M. & Grassi, W. Health-related quality of life in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: comparison of generic and disease-specific instruments. Clin Rheumatol 24, 29–37 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-004-0965-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-004-0965-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation