Abstract
The responsiveness of the DASH score in a consecutive cohort of surgically treated basal joint osteoarthritis of the thumb was studied in 15 patients. The effect size (=1.27) and standardized response (0.84) means that, as well as the high correlation with patient satisfaction, the DASH score is a useful tool to evaluate the outcome of surgical treatment for basal joint osteoarthritis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- DASH:
-
Disabilities arm, shoulder and hand
References
Amadio P (1997) Outcome assessment in hand surgery. What’s new? Clin Plast Surg 24:191–194
Beaton D, Katz J, Fossel A., Wright J, Tarasak V, Bombardier C (2001) Measuring the whole or parts? Validity reliability and responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 14:128–146
Gay R, Amadio P, Johnson J (2003) Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg 28A:250–254
Hudak P, Amadio P, Bombardier C and the Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH. Am J Ind Med 29:602–608
MacDermid J, Richards R, Donner A, Bellamy N, Roth J (2000) Responsiveness of the short form-36. Disability of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg 25A: 330–340
Veehof M, Sleegers E, Van Veldhoven N, Schumann A, Van Meeteren N (2002) Psychometric qualities of the Dutch language version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH-DLV). J Hand Ther15:347–354
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Smet, L. Responsiveness of the DASH score in surgically treated basal joint arthritis of the thumb: preliminary results. Clin Rheumatol 23, 223–224 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-004-0866-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-004-0866-y