Skip to main content
Log in

Study on uniaxial compressive strength of double matrix bimrocks considering different block proportions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bimrocks are a kind of complex geological body composed of a matrix and rock block. There are significant differences in matrix strength within bimrocks induced by geological tectonics, weathering, and so on. In this study, double matrix bimrocks are defined as that there are two matrices in bimrocks. The artificial bimrocks containing 4 kinds of matrix strength differences were fabricated, and the type of artificial bimrocks belongs to strong matrix weak rock block. The strength and failure characteristics of double matrix bimrocks were studied by indoor uniaxial compression tests. The results show that the difference in cohesion between the two matrices under different block proportions has significant effects on the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of the double matrix bimrocks. When the block proportion is less than 30%, the UCS of double matrix bimrocks with the small difference of matrix cohesion is lower than that of each single matrix bimrocks. As the difference of matrix cohesion increases, the UCS of double matrix bimrocks is between those of single matrix bimrocks with each matrix strength. When the block proportion is 50%, the UCS of the double matrix bimrocks is close to that of the single matrix bimrocks with stronger matrix. The difference of matrix cohesion has little effect on the UCS of the double matrix bimrocks when the block proportion range is 70 ~ 90%. In terms of failure characteristics, the failure modes of double matrix bimrocks are mainly summarized as penetrating failure, extended failure, and semi-penetrating failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and insightful suggestions.

Funding

The research is funded by China’s postdoctoral science fund (No. 2021M690865) and the open fund of Jiangsu Province Geological Engineering Environment Intelligent Monitoring Engineering Research Center (No. 2021-ZNJKJJ-04) and supported by the fundamental research funds for the central universities (No. B210201002) and natural key projects in Anhui Province (2022AH051751) and Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42007256 and No. 41672258).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Kai Li: data curation, formal analysis, validation, writing–original draft. Shaorui Sun: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, funding acquisition. Huilin Le: funding acquisition. Jihong Wei: supervision. Yanran Hu: data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaorui Sun.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, K., Sun, S., Le, H. et al. Study on uniaxial compressive strength of double matrix bimrocks considering different block proportions. Bull Eng Geol Environ 82, 293 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03324-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-023-03324-y

Keywords

Navigation