Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multi-channel analysis of surface waves (MASW) using dispersion and iterative inversion techniques: implications for cavity detection and geotechnical site investigation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most of the surface wave-based geophysical methods require an accurate estimate of the shear wave velocity (Vs) for geotechnical site investigation. The Vs gives a measure of shear modulus which is an important engineering parameter and also owns implications for delineating weak zones and cavities. Geotechnical investigation of such zones is imperative to avoid hazards related to high building construction. Among different surface wave-based geophysical methods, the multi-channel analysis of surface waves (MASW) is most widely used technique for geotechnical investigation by measuring in situ Vs. The present work focuses on MASW data acquisition and processing for accurate estimation of Vs by using dispersion analysis and different iteration-based inversion techniques (i.e., Monte Carlo and least square approaches). The proposed methodology is investigated at two sites in Abu Dhabi, UAE, using 24-channel seismograph network. The obtained results suggest that Monte Carlo approach is more efficient and reliable for Vs profile estimation and is recommended for geotechnical investigation. Monte Carlo approach-based results of the MASW velocity-profiles at both sites confirmed cavities and their geometries within the subsurface. Furthermore, the identified cavities are well in agreement with the trail borehole data, thus improving the confidence level of the obtained results. The characterization of the soil of both the sites and its implications are also presented with the help of NEHRP and IBC codes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

source interval is set as 5 m and the geophone interval as 1 m. Other parameters are set accordingly

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abudeif AM et al (2019) Geotechnical engineering evaluation of soil utilizing 2D multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) technique in New Akhmim city, Sohag, Upper Egypt. J Afr Earth Sci 157, 103512

  • Busato L et al (2016) Combined geophysical surveys for the characterization of a reconstructed river embankment. Eng Geol 211(2016):74–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardarelli E, Cercato M, De Donno G (2018) Surface and borehole geophysics for the rehabilitation of a concrete dam (Penne, Central Italy). Eng Geol 241:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai H-Y et al (2012) Some theoretical and numerical observations on scattering of Rayleigh waves in media containing shallow rectangular cavities. J Appl Geophys 83:107–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dal Moro G, Moura RMM, Moustafa SS (2015) Multi-component joint analysis of surface waves. J Appl Geophys 119:128–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eker AM, Akgün H, Koçkar MK (2012) Local site characterization and seismic zonation study by utilizing active and passive surface wave methods: a case study for the northern side of Ankara, Turkey. Eng Geol 151:64–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foti S (2000) Multistation methods for geotechnical characterization using surface waves. p 229

  • Foti S et al (2018) Guidelines for the good practice of surface wave analysis: a product of the InterPACIFIC project. Bull Earthq Eng 16(6):2367–2420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garofalo F et al (2016) InterPACIFIC project: Comparison of invasive and non-invasive methods for seismic site characterization. Part II: Inter-comparison between surface-wave and borehole methods. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 82:241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gélis C, Leparoux D, Virieux J, Bitri A, Operto S, Grandjean G (2005) Numerical modeling of surface waves over shallow cavities. J Environ Eng Geophys 10(2):111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harba P, Pilecki Z, Krawiec K (2019) Comparison of MASW and seismic interferometry with use of ambient noise for estimation of S-wave velocity field in landslide subsurface. Acta Geophys 67(6):1875–1883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harry DL et al (2005) Multichannel analysis of surface waves generated during high-resolution seismic reflection profiling of a fluvial aquifer. J Environ Eng Geophys 10(2):123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu J, Liu H (2019) Bayesian network models for probabilistic evaluation of earthquake-induced liquefaction based on CPT and Vs databases. Eng Geol 254:76–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Code Council (ICC) (2006) International building code, structural and fire and life-safety provisions (seismic, wind, accessibility, egress, occupancy and roof codes). Whittier, CA

  • Ivanov J et al (2000). Mapping Poisson’s Ratio of Unconsolidated Materials from a Joint Analysis of Surface-Wave and Refraction Events. https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2922727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov J et al (2006) Delineating a shallow fault zone and dipping bedrock strata using multi-channel analysis of surface waves with a land streamer. Geophys 71(5):39–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanli AI et al (2006) Vs30 mapping and soil classification for seismic site effect evaluation in Dinar region. SW Turkey Geophys J Int 165(1):223–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanli A (2010) Integrated approach for surface-wave analysis from near Surface to Bedrock. In Advances in near-Surface Seismology and Ground-Penetrating Radar 461–475 https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560802259.ch29

  • Liu W et al (2017) Spatially correlated multiscale Vs30 mapping and a case study of the Suzhou site. Eng Geol 220:110–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Liu F, Ma F, Wang M, Bai X, Zheng Y, ... Zhang G (2016) Collapsibility, composition, and microstructure of loess in China. Can Geotech J 53(4):673–686

  • Miller RD et al (1999) Using MASW to map bedrock in Olathe, Kansas: Report No. 99- 9 http://www.kgs.ku.edu/Geophysics/Reports2/Olathe.pdf

  • Mohamed AM (2013) Site-specific shear wave velocity investigation for geotechnical engineering applications using seismic refraction and 2D multi-channel analysis of surface waves. NRIAG J Astron Geophys 2(1):88–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasseri-Moghaddam A et al (2007) Effects of underground cavities on Rayleigh waves—Field and numerical experiments. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27(4):300–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyári Z, Kanlı AI (2007) Imaging of buried 3D objects by using electrical profiling methods with GPR and 3D geoelectrical measurements. J Geophys Eng 4(1):83–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olafsdottir EA, Erlingsson S, Bessason B (2020) Open-Source MASW Inversion Tool Aimed at Shear Wave Velocity Profiling for Soil Site Explorations. Geosci 10(8):322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park CB, Miller RD, Xia J (1998). Ground Roll as a Tool to Image near-Surface Anomaly. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1820627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park CB, Miller RD, Xia J (1999) Multi-Channel Analysis of Surface Waves Geophys 64(3):800–808

    Google Scholar 

  • Park CB et al (2000) Multichannel analysis of underwater surface waves near Vancouver, BC. Canada Doi 10(1190/1):1815635

    Google Scholar 

  • Park CB et al (2001) Seismic investigation of pavements by MASW method—geophone approach. https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2922938

  • Park CB (2007) Multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW)—active and passive methods. Lead Edge 26(1):60–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penumadu D, Park CB (2005) Multi-channel analysis of surface wave method (MASW) for geotechnical site characterization. 130:956–967 https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/40779%28158%293

  • Pegah E, Liu H (2016) Application of near-surface seismic refraction tomography and multichannel analysis of surface waves for geotechnical site characterizations: a case study. Engin Geol 208:100–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pegah E, Liu H (2020) Evaluation of hyperbolic stress-strain and bulk-modulus model parameters in granular soil mass using seismic surveying. Engin Geol, 266(5):105456

  • Rahimi S et al (2018) The combined use of MASW and resistivity surveys for levee assessment: a case study of the Melvin Price Reach of the Wood River Levee. Engin Geol 241:11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryden N et al (2003) Lamb Wave Analysis for Non-Destructive Testing of Concrete Plate Structures. https://doi.org/10.4133/1.2923224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab FA, Knopoff L (1972) Fast surface wave and free mode computations Methods J Comput Phy: Adv Res App, 87–180

  • Sena-Lozoya EB et al (2020) Seismic exploration survey northeast of the Tres Virgenes Geothermal Field, Baja California Sur, Mexico: A new Geothermal prospect. Geotherm, 84:101743

  • Shao GZ, Tsoflias GP, Li CJ (2016) Detection of near-surface cavities by generalized S-transform of Rayleigh waves. J Appl Geophys 129:53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen M et al (2016) Predicting liquefaction probability based on shear wave velocity: an update. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75(3):1199–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Socco LV, Strobbia C (2004) Surface Wave Methods for near-Surface Characterization: a Tutorial: near Surf Geophys 2:165–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Socco LV, Boiero D (2008) Improved Monte Carlo inversion of surface wave data. Geophys Prospect 56:357–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soupios PM et al (2007) Use of engineering geophysics to investigate a site for a building foundation. J Geophys Eng 4(1):94–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soupios P, Kokinou E (2016) Environmental geophysics: techniques, advantages and limitations. PRINCIPLES, APPLICATIONS AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES

  • Stokoe KH et al (1994) Characterization of Geotechnical Sites by SASW Method. In: Woods RD (ed) Geophysical Characterization of Sites. ISSMFE Technical Committee, Oxford, pp 15–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam P et al (2020) Modal analysis of Rayleigh waves using classical MASW-MAM approach: Site investigation in a reclaimed land. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 128:105902

  • Xia J, Miller RD, Park CB (1999) Estimation of near-surface shear-wave velocity by inversion of Rayleigh waves. Geophys 64(3):691–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia J et al (2000) Comparing shear-wave velocity profiles from MASW with borehole measurements in unconsolidated sediments, Fraser River Delta, BC. Canada J Environ Eng Geophys 5(3):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia J et al (2007) Feasibility of detecting near-surface feature with Rayleigh-wave diffraction. J Appl Geophys 62(3):244–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Baynunah Laboratories, Abu Dhabi, for allowing the use of data and software source for this research work and the Department of Earth Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University (QAU), Islamabad, Pakistan, which provided us the basic facilities for completing this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan

    Aamir Ali, Matee Ullah, Waleed Ahmed Raza & Zia ul Qamar

  2. Centre for Earthquake Studies, National Centre for Physics, Islamabad, Pakistan

    Adnan Barkat

  3. Earth System Science Programme, Faculty of Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

    Adnan Barkat

  4. Department of Geology, University of Haripur, Hattar Road, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

    Anwar Qadir

Authors
  1. Aamir Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matee Ullah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Adnan Barkat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Waleed Ahmed Raza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Anwar Qadir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zia ul Qamar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adnan Barkat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, A., Ullah, M., Barkat, A. et al. Multi-channel analysis of surface waves (MASW) using dispersion and iterative inversion techniques: implications for cavity detection and geotechnical site investigation. Bull Eng Geol Environ 80, 9217–9235 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02485-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02485-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation