Abstract
In recent years, the use of helical piles as a deep foundation option for structures has increased dramatically because they offer definite advantages over other solutions. The present study undertook a comprehensive investigation of the axial compressive behavior of helical piles in both sandy and clayey types of soil using finite element (FE) modeling. Since the helices of helical piles are more likely to disturb the soil adjacent to the pile, first some approaches are proposed to consider the effect of soil disturbance during a helical pile installation in numerical models. The numerical models have been validated and calibrated through full-scale compressive loading results using the ABAQUS software. The validated numerical models were used to investigate the load transfer mechanism of a typical helical pile in different types of sandy and clayey soil, and the numerically obtained ultimate bearing capacities were compared with the theoretical ones. Based on the comparison, it was found that the theoretical procedure overpredicts the ultimate capacity of helical piles in medium and dense sand. Additionally, different geometrical aspects of a typical helical pile were investigated using FE modeling in order to employ perfect geometry for studying the compressive behavior of a helical pile group with a square grid arrangement. The results revealed that the shape of the block failure mechanism in clayey soil differs from that in sandy soil. The acquired shapes are used to suggest a theoretical method for calculating the ultimate bearing capacity of a helical pile group based on the block failure mechanism.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams PA (2011) Helical pile application and design. PhD Engineer, LLC, pp 1–15
Al-Baghdadi TA, Brown MJ, Knappett JA, Al-Defae AH (2017) Effects of vertical loading on lateral screw pile performance. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Geotechnical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.16.00114
American Petroleum Institute (1974) API recommended practice for planning, designing, and constructing fixed offshore platforms. 9th ed. American Petroleum Institute, 24-31. Dallas, Texas. Recommended Practice 2A
Bagheri F, El Naggar MH (2013) Effects of installation disturbance on behavior of multi-helix anchors in sands. In: Proceedings of 66th Canadian Geotechnical Conference (GeoMontreal 2013), Paper No. 242
Bjerrum L (1972) Embankments on soft ground. Proceeding of Specialty Conference on Performance of Earth and Earth-Supported Structures, 2:1-54. USA
Bjerrum L (1973) Problems of soil mechanics and construction of soft clays. State-of-the-art report. In: 8th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering (ICSMFE), vol 3. Moscow, pp 111–159
Budhu M (2008) Soil mechanics and foundations, (With CD). John Wiley & Sons, New York
Cerfontaine B, Knappett JA, Brown MJ et al (2020) A finite element approach for determining the full load-displacement relationship of axially-loaded shallow screw anchors, incorporating installation effects. Can Geotech J. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2019-0548
Cook RD, Malkus DS, Plesha ME, Witt RJ (2007) Concepts and applications of finite element analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Elsherbiny ZH, El Naggar MH (2013) Axial compressive capacity of helical piles from field tests and numerical study. Can Geotech J 50(12):1191–1203
Fahmy A, El Naggar MH (2017) Axial performance of helical tapered piles in sand. Geotech Geol Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-017-0192-1
Ferguson TAB, Standing J (2012) A 2-D model experimental study of helical piles in sand using GeoPIV soft-ware, 1st Civil and Environmental Engineering Student Conference. Imperial College, London
George BE, Banerjee S, Gandhi SR (2017) Numerical analysis of helical piles in cohesionless soil. Int J Geotech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2017.141991
Hoyt RM, Clemence SP (1989) Uplift capacity of helical anchors in soil. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Jaky J (1948) Pressure in soil. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 1:103-107. Rotterdam, The Netherland
Knappett JA, Brown MJ, Brennan AJ, Hamilton L (2014) Optimising the compressive behaviour of screw piles in sand for marine renewable energy applications. In: Proceedings of DFI/EFFC 11th International Conference on Piling and Deep Foundations. Deep Foundations Institute
Lanyi-Bennett SA, Deng L (2018) Axial load testing of helical pile groups in glaciolacustrine clay. Can Geotech J. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0425
Livneh B, El Naggar MH (2008) Axial testing and numerical modeling of square shaft helical piles under compressive and tensile loading. Can Geotech J 45(7):1142–1155
Lutenegger AJ (2009) Cylindrical shear or plate bearing? — uplift behavior of multi-helix screw anchors in clay. In: International Foundation Congress and Equipment Expo 2009, 456-463. Orlando, Florida, United States, March 15-19
Lutenegger AJ (2011) Behavior of multi-helix screw anchors in sand. In: Proceedings of the 14thPan-American Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paper No. 126
Lutenegger A, Tsuha CHC (2015) Evaluating installation disturbance from helical piles and anchors using compression and tension tests. In: XV Pan-American Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Buenos Aires. Proceedings of the XV Pan-American Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, pp 373–381
Merifield RS (2011) Ultimate uplift capacity of multiplate helical type anchors in clay. J Geotech Geoenviron 137(7):704–716
Mitsch MP, Clemence SP (1985) The uplift capacity of helix anchors in sand. In: Uplift Behavior of Anchor Foundations in Soil. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, NY, pp 26–47 October 24
Mittal S, Mukherjee S (2015) Behaviour of group of helical screw anchors under compressive loads. Geotech Geol Eng 33(3):575–592
Mooney JS, Adamczak S, Clemence SP (1985) Uplift capacity of helical anchors in clay and silt. In: Uplift Behavior of Anchor Foundations in Soil. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, NY, pp 48–72 October 24
Nabizadeh F, Choobbasti AJ (2017) Field study of capacity helical piles in sand and silty clay. Transp Infrastruct Geotechnol 4(1):3–17
Narasimha RS, Prasad YVSN, Shetty MD, Joshi VV (1989) Uplift capacity of screw pile anchors. Geotech Eng 20:139–159
Narasimha RS, Prasad YVSN, Shetty MD (1991) The behaviour of model screw piles in cohesive soils. Soils Found 31(2):35–50
Narasimha RS, Prasad YVSN, Veeresh C (1993) Behaviour of embedded model screw anchors in soft clays. Geotechnique 43(4):605–614
Perez ZA, Schiavon JA, Tsuha CHC, Dias D, Thorel L (2018) Numerical and experimental study on the influence of installation effects on the behaviour of helical anchors in very dense sand. Can Geotech J 55(8):1067–1080
Perko HA (2009) Helical piles: a practical guide to design and installation. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Sakr M (2009) Performance of helical piles in oil sand. Can Geotech J 46(9):1046–1061
Salhi L, Nait-Rabah O, Deyrat C, Roos C (2013) Numerical modeling of single helical pile behavior under compressive loading in sand. Electron J Geotech Eng 18:4319–4338
Santos TC, Tsuha CHC, Giacheti HL (2013) The use of CPT to evaluate the effect of helical pile installation in tropical soils. In: Coutinho RQ, Mayne PW (eds) Geotechnical and Geological Site Characterization 4. Taylor and Francis Group, London, pp 1079–1084
Sharif YU, Brown MJ, Ciantia MO et al (2020) Using DEM to create a CPT based method to estimate the installation requirements of rotary installed piles in sand. Can Geotech J. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2020-0017
Smith M (2009) ABAQUS/Standard User’s Manual, Version 6.9. Simulia, Providence, RI
Stas CV, Kulhawy FH (1984) Critical evaluation of design methods for foundation under axial uplift and compression loading. Final Rep. No. EPRI-EL-3771. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ
Tappenden KM (2007) Predicting the axial capacity of screw piles installed in Western Canadian soils. University of Alberta, Canada, Master Thesis
Tappenden KM, Sego DC, Robertson PK (2009, 2009) Load transfer behavior of full-scale instrumented screw anchors. International Foundation Congress and Equipment Expo. https://doi.org/10.1061/41021(335)59
Tsuha CHC, Aoki N (2010) Relationship between installation torque and uplift capacity of deep helical piles in sand. Can Geotech J 47(6):635–647
Tsuha CHC, Aoki N, Rault G, Thorel L, Garnier J (2012) Evaluation of the efficiencies of helical anchor plates in sand by centrifuge model tests. Can Geotech J 49(9):1102–1114
Tsuha CHC, dos Santos FJMSM, Santos TDC (2016) Helical piles in unsaturated structured soil: a case study. Can Geotech J 53(1):103–117
Wang D, Merifield RS, Gaudin C, Hu Y (2010) Centrifuge model tests of helical anchors in clay. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 1069-1074. Zurich, Switzerland
Wang D, Merifield RS, Gaudin C (2013) Uplift behaviour of helical anchors in clay. Can Geotech J 50(6):575–584
Zhang DJY (1999) Predicting capacity of helical screw piles in Alberta soils. Master Thesis, University of Alberta, Canada
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nowkandeh, M.J., Choobbasti, A.J. Numerical study of single helical piles and helical pile groups under compressive loading in cohesive and cohesionless soils. Bull Eng Geol Environ 80, 4001–4023 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02158-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02158-w