Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The classifications of water and mud/rock inrush hazard: a review and update

  • Review Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water and mud/rock inrush has been recognized as one of the major geological hazards in underground engineering, which resulted in huge casualties, financial losses, or environmental disruption. Classification of hazard types plays an important role in understanding hazard behavior and guiding corresponding treatment measures. Various classifications of water and mud/rock inrush have been widely discussed. This paper reviewed the available classifications and considered the applicability of those classifications for numerous hazard cases since the 1950s. However, the current classifications were incompatible with occurred cases. The mainly used three classifications based on criteria of material type, hazard size, and geological feature, therefore, were updated to eliminate the incompatibility. A classification was first presented to distinguish between various materials of water and mud/rock inrush, utilizing five terms including water flow, diluent mud flow, viscous mud flow, water-rock flow, and mud-rock flow, followed by presenting the definition and description. Second, this paper differentiated between small, moderate, large, and extremely large water and mud/rock inrush concerning the gushing water flux and mud/rock volume. Subsequently, four terms, including karst terrain, geological structure, differential weathering zone, and unconsolidated sediments, were used to make up a classification system that distinguishes hazard types through geological features. Sixteen subclasses were also subsequently defined and described. Moreover, to describe the hazard class in a shorthand way, a classification code was developed for each class of three updated classifications. Finally, the treatment technology for each hazard type was included in this paper. The updated classifications eliminated their incompatibility with numerous hazard cases, and targeted approaches for dealing with the hazards can now be quickly located, thereby saving time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data of this paper were listed in tables.

References

  • Allaby M (2008) A dictionary of earth sciences third ed Oxford University Press Oxford

  • Bayati M, Hamidi JK (2017) A case study on TBM tunneling in fault zones and lessons learned from ground improvement. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 63:162–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgin N (2016) An appraisal of TBM performances in Turkey in difficult ground conditions and some recommendations. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 57:265–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonacci O (1993) Karst springs hydrographs as indicators of karst aquifers. Hydrol Sci J 38(1):51–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Q (2005) Research on the engineering geology system of long karst and gas-storage tunnel. Dissertation, Southwest Jiaotong University China (in Chinese)

  • Chen B, Fu Z (2017) Analysis and application of water inrush mechanism in tunnel based on thin plate model. AMSE J 86(1):221–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Wang Y (2012) Study on construction technique of soft rock tunnel in loess region. Appl Mech Mater 204–208:1480–1483

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu H, Xu G, Yasufuku N, Yu Z, Liu P, Wang J (2017) Risk assessment of water inrush in karst tunnels based on two-class fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Arab J Geosci 10(7):179

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalgic S (2002) Tunneling in squeezing rock the Bolu tunnel Anatolian Motorway Turkey. Eng Geol 67(1):69–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Derbyshire E (2001) Geological hazards in loess terrain with particular reference to the loess regions of China. Earth-Sci Rev 54(1–3):231–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan H, Zhang Y, He S, Wang K, Wang X, Wang H (2018) Hazards and treatment of karst tunneling in Qinling-Daba mountainous area: overview and lessons learnt from Yichang–Wanzhou railway system. Environ Earth Sci 77(19):679

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Shi L, Lou H (1999) Law of mining floor water-inrush and its preferred plane. China University of Mining and Technology Press, Xuzhou (in Chinese)

  • Goel RK, Jethwa JL, Paithankar AG (1995) Tunneling through the young Himalayas- a case history of the Maneri Uttarkashi power tunnel. Eng Geol 39:31–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Gradziński M, Bella P, Holúbek P (2018) Constructional caves in freshwater limestone:a review of their origin classification significance and global occurrence. Earth-Sci Rev 185:179–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez F, Parise M, De Waele J, Jourde H (2014) A review on natural and human-induced geohazards and impacts in karst. Earth-Sci Rev 138:61–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Hencher SR (2012) Practical engineering geology. Spon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang M, Zhang X, Xu M, Cai L (2011) Mechanism analysis and criterion for avoiding risk of karst water burst flood illustrated in Maluqing tunnel. Adv Mater Res 250:2650–2661

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu H, Zhang B, Zuo Y, Zhang C, Wang Y, Guo Z (2018) The mechanism and numerical simulation analysis of water bursting in filling karst tunnel. Geotech Geol Eng 36(2):1197–1205

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungr O, Leroueil S, Picarelli L (2014) The Varnes classification of landslide types an update. Landslides 11(2):167–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam MR, Hayashi D, Kamruzzaman AB (2009) Finite element modeling of stress distributions and problems for multi-slice longwall mining in Bangladesh with special reference to the Barapukuria coal mine. Int J Coal Geol 78:91–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang X, Luo S, Xu M, Zhang Q, Yang Y (2019) Dynamic estimating the karst tunnel water inrush based on monitoring data during excavation. Acta Carsologica 48(1):118–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee C, Sijing W, Zhifu Y (1996) Geotechnical aspects of rock tunnelling in China. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 11(4):445–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Gao C, Zhou Z, Li L, Wang M, Yuan Y, Wang J (2019) Analysis on the precursor information of water inrush in karst tunnels: a true triaxial model test study. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52(2):373–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S, He P, Li L, Shi S, Zhang Q, Zhang J, Hu J (2017a) Gaussian process model of water inflow prediction in tunnel construction and its engineering applications. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 69:155–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Li Y (2014) Research on risk assessment system for water inrush in the karst tunnel construction based on GIS:a case study on the diversion tunnel groups of the Jinping II Hydropower Station. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 40:182–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Lin P, Xu Z, Li L, He S, Zhao S, Huang X (2017b) Innovative method for the integral sliding stability analysis of filling media in karst caves and its applications in engineering. Int J Geomech 17(12):04017109

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Liu B, Xu X, Nie L, Liu Z, Song J, Sun H, Chen L, Fan K (2017c) An overview of ahead geological prospecting in tunneling. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 63:69–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Tu W, Shi S, Chen J, Zhang Y (2016) Mechanism of water inrush in tunnel construction in karst area. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 7(sup1):35–46

  • Li S, Wu J (2019) A multi-factor comprehensive risk assessment method of karst tunnels and its engineering application. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78(3):1761–1776

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Xu Z, Huang X, Lin P, Zhao X, Zhang Q, Yang L, Zhang X, Sun H, Pan D (2018) Classification geological identification hazard mode and typical case studies of hazard-causing structures for water and mud inrush in tunnels. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 37(5):1041–1069 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Wu J, Xu Z, Li L (2017d) Unascertained measure model of water and mud inrush risk evaluation in karst tunnels and its engineering application. KSCE J Civil Eng 21(4):1170–1182

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Zhang P, He Z, Huang Z, Cheng M, Guo L (2017e) Identification of geological structure which induced heavy water and mud inrush in tunnel excavation: a case study on Lingjiao tunnel. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 69:203–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Zhou Z, Ye Z, Li L, Zhang Q, Xu Z (2015) Comprehensive geophysical prediction and treatment measures of karst caves in deep buried tunnel. J Appl Geophys 116:247–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang Y, Sui W, Qi J (2019) Experimental investigation of chemical grouting of inclined fracture to control sand and water flow. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 83:82–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin H, Lee C (2009) An approach to assessing the hydraulic conductivity disturbance in fractured rocks around the Syueshan tunnel Taiwan. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 24(2):222–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Chen W, Yuan J, Li C, Zhang Q, Li X (2018) Groundwater control and curtain grouting for tunnel construction in completely weathered granite. Bull Eng Geol Environ 77:515–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q, Huang X, Gong Q, Du L, Pan Y, Liu J (2016) Application and development of hard rock TBM and its prospect in China. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 57:33–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Liu Z, Li S, Nie L, Su M, Sun H, Fan K, Zhang X, Pang Y (2017) Comprehensive surface geophysical investigation of karst caves ahead of the tunnel face: a case study in the Xiaoheyan section of the water supply project from Songhua River Jilin. China J Appl Geophys 144:37–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee C, Maharaj SM, Wrona T, Jackson CAL (2015) Controls on the expression of igneous intrusions in seismic reflection data. Geosphere 11(4):1024–1041

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancktelow NS (2006) How ductile are ductile shear zones? Geology 34(5):345–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Mo Y (2009) Study on risk investigation on the stability of karst tunnel infilling with high pressure groundwater. Dissertation, Southwest Jiaotong University (in Chinese)

  • Mohammadi Z, Illman WA, Masoud K (2018) Optimization of the hydrodynamic characteristics of a karst conduit with CFPv2 coupled to OSTRICH. J Hydrol 567:564–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson TC (2005) Distinguishing between debris flows and floods from field evidence in small watersheds (report no 2004–3142). US Geological Survey, US

  • Qian X (1990) The water storage structure types in China. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Shang J, West LJ, Hencher SR, Zhao Z (2018) Geological discontinuity persistence: implications and quantification. Eng Geol 241:41–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi H, Bai M, Xing S (2017) Mechanics parameter optimization and evaluation of curtain grouting material in deep water-rich karst tunnels. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2017:1853951

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi S, Xie X, Bu L, Li L, Zhou Z (2018) Hazard-based evaluation model of water inrush disaster sources in karst tunnels and its engineering application. Environ Earth Sci 77(4):141

    Google Scholar 

  • Song KI, Cho GC, Chang SB (2012) Identification remediation and analysis of karst sinkholes in the longest railroad tunnel in South Korea. Eng Geol 135:92–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun C (2016) Numerical simulation study of disaster evolution and water inrush in filling type structure of tunnel. Dissertation, Shandong University (in Chinese)

  • Sun W, Zhang S, Guo W, Liu W (2017) Physical simulation of high-pressure water inrush through the floor of a deep mine. Mine Water Environ 36(4):542–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavani S, Storti F, Lacombe O, Corradetti A, Muñoz JA, Mazzoli S (2015) A review of deformation pattern templates in foreland basin systems and fold-and-thrust belts: implications for the state of stress in the frontal regions of thrust wedges. Earth-Sci Rev 141:82–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng DJ, Tsai BR, Chang LC (2001) A case study on ground treatment for a rock tunnel with high groundwater ingression in Taiwan. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 16:175–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Varnes DJ (1978) Slope movement types and processes. In: Schuster RL, Krizek RJ (eds) Landslides analysis and control special report 176. Transportation research board National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC, pp 11–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang C (2015) Study on risk identification and warning of karst water bursting disaster of railway tunnel. Dissertation, Beijing Jiaotong University, pp. 50–52 (in Chinese)

  • Wang Y, Chen F, Yin X, Geng F (2019) Study on the risk assessment of water inrush in karst tunnels based on intuitionistic fuzzy theory Geomatic. Nat Haz Risk 10(1):1070–1083

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Jing H, Yu L, Su H, Luo N (2017) Set pair analysis for risk assessment of water inrush in karst tunnels. Bull Eng Geol Environ 76(3):1199–1207

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Li Y, Liu H, Tan D, Liu S (2016) Leakage management for Yangpeng tunnel in karst area. Electron J Geotech Eng 21(9):3493–3504

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Wang M (2006) Analysis of mechanism of water inrush in Karst tunnels. Proceedings of GeoShanghai International Conference Shanghai China, pp 66–72

  • Wang J, Wu L, Liu W, Cui T, Zhao Y, Yin Y, Liu X (2018) Tectonics dominated hypogene karst geo-hazard mechanism models in China’s tunnel construction. Proceedings of GeoShanghai International Conference, Singapore, pp. 190–199

  • Wu G, Chen W, Yuan J, Yang D, Bian H (2017a) Formation mechanisms of water inrush and mud burst in a migmatite tunnel: a case study in China. J Mt Sci 14(1):188–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Li S, Xu ZH, Huang X, Xue Y, Wang Z, Li L (2017b) Flow characteristics and escape-route optimization after water inrush in a backward-excavated karst tunnel. Int J Geomech 17(4):04016096

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue Y, Kong F, Yang W, Qiu D, Su M, Fu K, Ma X (2020) Main unfavorable geological conditions and engineering geological problems along Sichuan–Tibet railway. Chin J Rock Mech Rock Eng 39(3):445–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue Y, Li Z, Li S, Qiu D, Su M, Xu Z, Zhou B, Tao Y (2019) Water inrush risk assessment for an undersea tunnel crossing a fault: an analytical model. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 37(7):816–827

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue Y, Zhang X, Li S, Qiu D, Su M, Li L, Li Z, Tao Y (2018) Analysis of factors influencing tunnel deformation in loess deposits by data mining: a deformation prediction model. Eng Geol 232:94–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang W, Xia X, Zhao G, Ji Y, Shen D (2011) Overburden failure and the prevention of water and sand inrush during coal mining under thin bedrock. Min Sci Tech China 21(5):733–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao H, Gao F, Yu S, Dang W (2017) Construction risks of Huaying mount tunnel and countermeasures. Front Struct Civ Eng 11(3):279–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan J, Chen W, Tan X, Yang D, Wang S (2019) Countermeasures of water and mud inrush disaster in completely weathered granite tunnels: a case study. Environ Earth Sci 78(18):576

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarei HR, Uromeihy A, Sharifzadeh M (2011) Evaluation of high local groundwater inflow to a rock tunnel by characterization of geological features. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 26:364–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G, Jiao Y, Ma C, Wang H, Chen L, Tang Z (2018) Alteration characteristics of granite contact zone and treatment measures for inrush hazards during tunnel construction–a case study. Eng Geol 235:64–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang GH, Jiao YY, Wang H (2014) Outstanding issues in excavation of deep and long rock tunnels: a case study. Can Geotech J 51(9):984–994

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G, Jiao Y, Wang H, Cheng Y, Chen L (2017) On the mechanism of inrush hazards when Denghuozhai tunnel passing through the granite contact zone. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 68:174–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Li S, Ge Y, Xu Z, Liu R (2011) Study on risk evaluation method of water inrush and integrated geological prediction technology in high-risk karst tunnel. Proceedings of GeoHunan International Conference Hunan China, pp 285–291

  • Zhang J, Li S, Zhang Q, Zhang X, Li P, Wang D, Weng X (2019a) Mud inrush flow mechanisms: a case study in a water-rich fault tunnel. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78(8):6267–6283

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Liu N, Chu W (2016) Key technologies and risk management of deep tunnel construction at Jinping II hydropower station. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 8(4):499–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G, Wang C, Jiao Y, Wang H, Chen L (2019b) Deposits sources of inrush hazards for the Liangshan tunnel passing through deeply buried granite. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 92:103058

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Li P, Tian S (2013) Prevention and treatment technologies of railway tunnel water inrush and mud gushing in China. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 5(6):468–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou W, Liao S (2016) The analysis and control of inrush and mud gushing in the broken rock tunnel under high water pressure. Procedia Eng 165:259–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu B, Kou W, Xi J, Shen Y (2016) Numerical simulation research of construction method for shallow buried large section tunnel. Open Civil Eng J 10:578–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Miao Q, Jiang S (2014) On karst water inrush (gushing) geological environment in Pingyang tunnel. Appl Mech Mater 580–583:1008–1012

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu B, Wu L, Peng Y, Zhou W, Chen C (2018a) Risk assessment of water inrush in tunnel through water-rich fault. Geotech Geol Eng 36(1):317–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu G, Wu X, Yu S, Qian C, Dong Y, Zhang C, Wu C (2018b) Surface water control for mining thick relatively shallow coal seams in the loess area of Western China. Mine Water Environ 37(3):442–455

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the editors and reviewers for their time and effort in reviewing and improving this paper.

Code availability

No code was included in this paper.

Funding

The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 41877239, 51379112, 51422904, 40902084, and 41772298), Fundamental Research Fund of Shandong University (grant number 2018JC044), and Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (grant number JQ201513).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Fanmeng Kong and Yiguo Xue contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center, Shandong University, Jinan, 250061, China

    Yiguo Xue, Fanmeng Kong, Daohong Qiu, Maoxin Su, Ying Zhao & Kai Zhang

Authors
  1. Yiguo Xue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fanmeng Kong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daohong Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maoxin Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ying Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kai Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y. Xue: conceptualization, methodology, and writing-original draft preparation. F. Kong: writing-original draft preparation, reviewing, and editing. D. Qiu: reviewing and editing. M. Su: reviewing and editing. Z. Xu: methodology, reviewing, and editing. Y. Zhao: reviewing and editing. K. Zhang: reviewing and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yiguo Xue.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xue, Y., Kong, F., Qiu, D. et al. The classifications of water and mud/rock inrush hazard: a review and update. Bull Eng Geol Environ 80, 1907–1925 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-02012-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-02012-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation