Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of rockburst risk in underground projects developing a neuro-bee intelligent system

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The prediction of the risk of rockbursts in burst-prone grounds is turned into a challenging and vital mission for most underground projects that attract great interest from engineers and researchers. In this study, a hybrid technique, the artificial neural network (ANN) and artificial bee colony (ABC), neuro-bee model, was considered to create the sophisticated relationship between the risk of rockbursts in burst-prone grounds and its influencing factors. The establishment and validation of ANN models were implemented via a data set extracted from previous works, and the database covers 246 reliable rockburst cases. Six influencing factors were selected as input variables. Five-fold cross validation were adopted to tune hyper-parameters of ABC-ANN models, and the performance of ANN models was evaluated by correlation coefficient (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE). Observational experiment results indicated that the ABC-ANN algorithm can be utilized as an effective tool for predicting the risk of rockbursts in burst-prone grounds. The R2 and RMSE values between the predicted and actual rockburst values were 0.9656 and 0.1281, respectively. Sensitivity analyses implemented by the response surface method revealed that the maximum tangential stress of the cavern wall and the elastic strain index parameters have a greater effects on rockburst compared with other input parameters. As a result, the proposed hybrid method outperforms the other models for rockburst prediction in terms of the prediction accuracy and the generalization capability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adoko AC, Gokceoglu C, Wu L, Zuo QJ (2013) Knowledge-based and data-driven fuzzy modeling for rockburst prediction. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 61:86–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afraei S, Shahriar K, Madani SH (2018) Statistical assessment of rock burst potential and contributions of considered predictor variables in the task. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 72:250–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armaghani DJ, Koopialipoor M, Marto A, Yagiz S (2019). Application of several optimization techniques for estimating TBM advance rate in granitic rocks. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng

  • Badem H, Basturk A, Caliskan A, Yuksel ME (2018) A new hybrid optimization method combining artificial bee colony and limited-memory BFGS algorithms for efficient numerical optimization. Appl Soft Comput 70:826–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook NGW (1965) A note on rockbursts considered as a problem of stability. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 65:437–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhahri H, Alimi AM, Abraham A (2012) Designing beta basis function neural network for optimization using artificial bee colony (abc). In: Neural Networks (IJCNN), The 2012 International Joint Conference on. IEEE, pp 1–7

  • Engelbrecht AP (2007) Computational intelligence: an introduction. John Wiley & Sons

  • Faradonbeh RS, Taheri A (2018) Long-term prediction of rockburst hazard in deep underground openings using three robust data mining techniques. Eng Comput:1–17

  • Feng X-T, Wang LN (1994) Rockburst prediction based on neural networks. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 4:7–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Ge QF, Feng XT (2008) Classi?cation and prediction of rockburst using AdaBoost combination learning method. Rock Soil Mech 29(4):943–948

  • Ghaleini EN, Koopialipoor M, Momenzadeh M et al (2018) A combination of artificial bee colony and neural network for approximating the safety factor of retaining walls. Eng Comput:1–12

  • Gong F, Li X (2007) A distance discriminant analysis method for prediction of possibility and classification of rockburst and its application. Yanshilixue Yu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese J Rock Mech Eng 26:1012–1018

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong FQ, Li XB, Zhang W (2010) Rockburst prediction of underground engineering based on Bayes discriminant analysis method. Rock Soil Mech 31(Suppl. 1):370–377

  • Gong F, Luo Y, Li X et al (2018) Experimental simulation investigation on rockburst induced by spalling failure in deep circular tunnels. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 81:413–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, F.Q., Li, X.B., Zhang, W., 2010. Rockburst prediction of underground engineering based on Bayes discriminant analysis method. Rock Soil Mech. 31(1):370–377

  • Gordan B, Koopialipoor M, Clementking A et al (2018) Estimating and optimizing safety factors of retaining wall through neural network and bee colony techniques. Eng Comput:1–10

  • Guo H, Zhou J, Koopialipoor M, et al (2019) Deep neural network and whale optimization algorithm to assess flyrock induced by blasting. Eng Comput 1–14

  • Haykin S, Network N (2004) A comprehensive foundation. Neural Netw 2:41

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahed Armaghani D, Hajihassani M, Monjezi M et al (2015) Application of two intelligent systems in predicting environmental impacts of quarry blasting. Arab J Geosci 8:9647–9665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-1908-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser PK, MacCreath DR, Tannant DD (1996) Canadian rockburst support handbook: prepared for sponsors of the Canadian rockburst research program 1990-1995. Geomechanics Research Centre

  • Karaboga D (2005) An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization. Technical report-tr06, Erciyes university, engineering faculty, computer engineering department

  • Khandelwal M, Singh TN (2009) Correlating static properties of coal measures rocks with P-wave velocity. Int J Coal Geol 79:55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisi O, Ozkan C, Akay B (2012) Modeling discharge–sediment relationship using neural networks with artificial bee colony algorithm. J Hydrol 428:94–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopialipoor M, Armaghani DJ, Haghighi M, Ghaleini EN (2017) A neuro-genetic predictive model to approximate overbreak induced by drilling and blasting operation in tunnels. Bull Eng Geol Environ 1–10

  • Koopialipoor M, Armaghani DJ, Hedayat A et al (2018a) Applying various hybrid intelligent systems to evaluate and predict slope stability under static and dynamic conditions. Soft Comput:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3253-3

  • Koopialipoor M, Fallah A, Armaghani DJ et al (2018b) Three hybrid intelligent models in estimating flyrock distance resulting from blasting. Eng Comput:1–14

  • Koopialipoor M, Ghaleini EN, Haghighi M et al (2018c) Overbreak prediction and optimization in tunnel using neural network and bee colony techniques. Eng Comput:1–12

  • Koopialipoor M, Nikouei SS, Marto A, et al (2018d) Predicting tunnel boring machine performance through a new model based on the group method of data handling. Bull Eng Geol Environ 1–15

  • Koopialipoor M, Fahimifar A, Ghaleini EN, et al (2019a) Development of a new hybrid ANN for solving a geotechnical problem related to tunnel boring machine performance. Eng Comput 1–13

  • Koopialipoor M, Ghaleini EN, Tootoonchi H et al (2019b) Developing a new intelligent technique to predict overbreak in tunnels using an artificial bee colony-based ANN. Environ Earth Sci 78:165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8163-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopialipoor M, Murlidhar BR, Hedayat A et al (2019c) The use of new intelligent techniques in designing retaining walls. Eng Comput:1–12

  • Koopialipoor M, Noorbakhsh A, Noroozi Ghaleini E, et al (2019d) A new approach for estimation of rock brittleness based on non-destructive tests. Nondestruct Test Eval 1–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2019.1623214

  • Koopialipoor M, Tootoonchi H, Jahed Armaghani D et al (2019e) Application of deep neural networks in predicting the penetration rate of tunnel boring machines. Bull Eng Geol Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01538-7

  • Kumbhar PY, Krishnan S (2011) Use of Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) algorithm in artificial neural network synthesis. Int J Adv Eng Sci Technol 11:162–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurban T, Beşdok E (2009) A comparison of RBF neural network training algorithms for inertial sensor based terrain classification. Sensors 9:6312–6329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le LT, Nguyen H, Dou J, Zhou J (2019) A comparative study of PSO-ANN, GA-ANN, ICA-ANN, and ABC-ANN in estimating the heating load of buildings'energy efficiency for smart city planning. Appl Sci 9(13):2630

  • Li N, Jimenez R (2018) A logistic regression classifier for long-term probabilistic prediction of rock burst hazard. Nat Hazards 90:197–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li N, Feng X, Jimenez R (2017a) Predicting rock burst hazard with incomplete data using Bayesian networks. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 61:61–70

  • Li TZ, Li YX, Yang XL (2017b) Rock burst prediction based on genetic algorithms and extreme learning machine. J Cent South Univ 24(9):2105–2113

  • Li X, Zhou J, Wang S, Liu B (2017c) Review and practice of deep mining for solid mineral resources. Chin J Nonferrous Met 27:1236–1262

    Google Scholar 

  • Li E, Zhou J, Shi X, Armaghani DJ, Yu Z, Chen X, Huang P (2020) Developing a hybrid model of salp swarm algorithm-based support vector machine to predict the strength of fiber-reinforced cemented paste backfill. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01014-x

  • Liao X, Khandelwal M, Yang H et al (2019) Effects of a proper feature selection on prediction and optimization of drilling rate using intelligent techniques. Eng Comput:1–12

  • Lin Y, Zhou K, Li J (2018) Application of cloud model in rock burst prediction and performance comparison with three machine learning algorithms. IEEE Access 6:30958–30968

  • Liu Z, Shao J, Xu W, Meng Y (2013) Prediction of rock burst classification using the technique of cloud models with attribution weight. Nat Hazards 68:549–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal SK, Singh MM (2009) Evaluating extent and causes of overbreak in tunnels. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 24:22–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch WS, Pitts W (1943) A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys 5:115–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamad ET, Koopialipoor M, Murlidhar BR et al (2019) A new hybrid method for predicting ripping production in different weathering zones through in-situ tests. Measurement

  • Monjezi M, Hasanipanah M, Khandelwal M (2013) Evaluation and prediction of blast-induced ground vibration at Shur River Dam, Iran, by artificial neural network. Neural Comput & Applic 22:1637–1643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nourani E, Rahmani AM, Navin AH (2012) Forecasting stock prices using a hybrid artificial bee colony based neural network. In: Innovation Management and Technology Research (ICIMTR), 2012 International Conference on. IEEE, pp 486–490

  • Ortlepp WD (2005) RaSiM comes of age–a review of the contribution to the understanding and control of mine rockbursts. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Rockburst and Seismicity in Mines, Perth, Western Australia. pp 9–11

  • Pu Y, Apel DB, Lingga B (2018) Rockburst prediction in kimberlite using decision tree with incomplete data. J Sust Min 17(3):158–165

  • Schloerke B, Crowley J, Cook D, et al (2011) Ggally: extension to ggplot2

  • Shi XZ, Zhou J, Dong L, Hu HY, Wang HY, Chen SR (2010) Application of un- ascertained measurement model to prediction of classification of rockburst intensity. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 29(supp.1):2720–2727

  • Tao M, Ma A, Cao WZ, Li XB, Gong FQ (2017) Dynamic response of pre-stressed rock with a circular cavity subject to transient loading. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 99:1–8

  • Tao M, Li ZW, Cao WZ, Li XB, Wu CQ (2019) Stress redistribution of dynamic loading incident with arbitrary waveform through a circular cavity. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 43(6):1279–1299

  • Trevor H, Robert T, JH F (2009) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction

  • Wang SY, Lam KC, Au SK, Tang CA, Zhu WC, Yang TH (2006) Analytical and numerical study on the pillar rockbursts mechanism. Rock Mech Rock Eng 39(5):445–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Li X, Du K, Wang S, Tao M (2018a) Experimental study of the triaxial strength properties of hollow cylindrical granite specimens under coupled external and internal confining stresses. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51(7):2015–2031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Li X, Wang S (2018b) Three-dimensional mineral grade distribution modelling and longwall mining of an underground bauxite seam. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 103:123–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Li X, Yao J, Gong F, Li X, Du K, Tao M, Huang L, Du S (2019a) Experimental investigation of rock breakage by a conical pick and its application to non-explosive mechanized mining in deep hard rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 122:104063

  • Wang S, Liu Y, Du K, Zhou J (2019b) Dynamic failure properties of sandstone under radial gradient stress and cyclical impact loading. Front Earth Sci 7:251

  • Wenner AM, Wells PH, Rohlf FJ (1967) An analysis of the waggle dance and recruitment in honey bees. Physiol Zool 40:317–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer

  • Xia-ting F, Webber S, Ozbay MU (1998) Neural network assessment of rockburst risks for deep gold mines in South Africa [J]. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 8:335–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Gordan B, Koopialipoor M et al (2019) Improving performance of retaining walls under dynamic conditions developing an optimized ANN based on ant colony optimization technique. IEEE Access 7:94692–94700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Koopialipoor M, Armaghani DJ et al (2019) Intelligent design of retaining wall structures under dynamic conditions. Steel Compos Struct 31:629–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao HB (2005) Classification of rockburst using support vector machine. Rock Soil Mech 26:642–644

  • Zhao Y, Noorbakhsh A, Koopialipoor M et al (2019) A new methodology for optimization and prediction of rate of penetration during drilling operations. Eng Comput:1–9

  • Zhou J, Shi X, Dong L et al (2010) Fisher discriminant analysis model and its application for prediction of classification of rockburst in deep-buried long tunnel. J Coal Sci Eng 16:144–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Li X, Shi X (2012) Long-term prediction model of rockburst in underground openings using heuristic algorithms and support vector machines. Saf Sci 50:629–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Li X, Mitri HS (2016a) Classification of rockburst in underground projects: comparison of ten supervised learning methods. J Comput Civ Eng 30:4016003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Shi XZ, Huang RD, Qiu XY, Chen C (2016b) Feasibility of stochastic gradient boosting approach for predicting rockburst damage in burst-prone mines. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 26(7):1938–1945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Li X, Mitri HS (2018) Evaluation method of rockburst: state-of-the-art literature review. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 81:632–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Aghili N, Ghaleini EN, et al (2019a) A Monte Carlo simulation approach for effective assessment of flyrock based on intelligent system of neural network. Eng Comput 1–11

  • Zhou J, Koopialipoor M, Murlidhar BR et al (2019b) Use of intelligent methods to design effective pattern parameters of mine blasting to minimize flyrock distance. Nat Resour Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-019-09519-z

  • Zhou J, Li E, Yang S, Wang M, Shi X, Yao S, Mitri HS (2019c) Slope stability prediction for circular mode failure using gradient boosting machine approach based on an updated database of case histories. Saf Sci 118:505–518

  • Zhou J, Guo H, Koopialipoor M, Armaghani DJ, Tahir MM (2020) Investigating the effective parameters on the risk levels of rockburst phenomena by developing a hybrid heuristic algorithm. Eng Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00908-9

Download references

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation Project of China (41630642; 41807259), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (Grant No. 2018JJ3693), the Innovation-Driven Project of Central South University (No. 2020CX040), and the Sheng Hua Lie Ying Program of Central South University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danial Jahed Armaghani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, J., Koopialipoor, M., Li, E. et al. Prediction of rockburst risk in underground projects developing a neuro-bee intelligent system. Bull Eng Geol Environ 79, 4265–4279 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01788-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01788-w

Keywords

Navigation