Skip to main content
Log in

A modified Logit model for assessment and validation of debris-flow susceptibility

Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The accuracy of a debris-flow susceptibility assessment model can not be achieved to an acceptable level without rigorously selecting/processing model input parameters and reliably validating the results with ground truth. In this study, a modified logistic regression model was applied to examine the debris-flow susceptibility in the semi-arid mountainous areas of the southeast Tibetan Plateau, taking the case of the Benzilan-Changbo segment of the Jinsha River. The logistic regression model validation was supported by a field investigation and interpreting aerial photographs. The frequency ratio method was adapted for the sensitivity analysis of ten predisposing factors, including a factor of human activities that has never been considered in previous studies for the selected study area. The model with the highest prediction accuracy (83%) was obtained by comparing 55 possible combinations of the ten factors evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic curve technique. Composite analysis and random sample testing were also conducted to verify the reliability of the susceptibility assessment. The prediction results showed that the actual debris-flow area accounted for 92% of the total predicted debris-flow area. In summary, this study reveals that: (1) the highest susceptibility area was mainly distributed in the northeast and middle riparian zones, partially scattered in the southwest. Human activity was found to be closely related to the probability of debris flow occurrences; (2) under the two situations of independent and index combination participation evaluation, the performances of the same related factors showed largely different effects on the assessment results, which reflected the interrelation and interaction of the factors causing the debris flow; (3) the accuracy of the modified logistic regression model increased by 15%, when compared with the index entropy model in a previous study, and the reasons for this were discussed in the current study. The modified model, along with its enhanced validation process, could be easily extended to other regional mass movement susceptibility analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berenguer M, Sempere-Torres D, Huerlimann M (2015) Debris-flow forecasting at regional scale by combining susceptibility mapping and radar rainfall. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 15:587–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blais-Stevens A, Behnia P, Kremer M, Page A, Kung R, Bonham-Carter G (2012) Landslide susceptibility mapping of the sea to sky transportation corridor, British Columbia, Canada: comparison of two methods. Bull Eng Geol Environ 71:447–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borga M, Dalla Fontana G, Gregoretti C, Marchi L (2002) Assessment of shallow landsliding by using a physically based model of hillslope stability. Hydrol Process 16:2833–2851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bregoli F, Medina V, Chevalier G, Huerlimann M, Bateman A (2015) Debris-flow susceptibility assessment at regional scale: validation on an alpine environment. Landslides 12:437–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmassi F, Liberati G, Ricciardi C, Sciotti M (1992) Stability evaluation for unified power-plant siting in geothermal areas. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Landslides, pp 893–898

  • Carrara A, Merenda L (1976) Landslide inventory in northern Calabria, southern Italy. Geol Soc Am Bull 87:1153–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrara A, Crosta G, Frattini P (2008) Comparing models of debris-flow susceptibility in the alpine environment. Geomorphology 94(3):353–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cevasco A, Pepe G, Brandolini P (2014) The influences of geological and land use settings on shallow landslides triggered by an intense rainfall event in a coastal terraced environment. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73(3):859–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Dai FC, Yao X (2008) Holocene debris-flow deposits and their implications on the climate in the upper Jinsha River valley, China. Geomorphol 93:493–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Cui ZJ, Dai FC, Xu C (2011) Genetic mechanism of the major debris-flow deposits at Benzilan-Dari segment, the upper Jinsha River. J Mt Sci 29:312–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Dai FC, Lv TY, Cui ZJ (2013) Holocene landslide-dammed lake deposits in the upper Jinsha River, SE Tibetan plateau and their ages. Quat Int 298(6):107–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen NS, Chen ML, Li J, He N, Deng MF, Javed IT, Cai M (2015) Effects of human activity on erosion, sedimentation and debris flow activity - a case study of the Qionghai lake watershed, southeastern Tibetan plateau, China. Holocene 25(6):973–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CW, Saito H, Oguchi T (2016) Analyzing rainfall-induced mass movements in Taiwan using the soil water index. Landslides 2016b:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Li Y, Zhou W, Iqbal J, Cui ZJ (2016a) Debris-flow susceptibility assessment model and its application in semi-arid mountainous areas of the southeastern Tibetan plateau. Nat Hazards Rev 18(2):05016005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiarle M, Iannotti S, Mortara G, Deline P (2007) Recent debris flow occurrences associated with glaciers in the Alps. Glob Planet Chang 56:123–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury RN, Bertoldi C (1977) Residual shear tests on soil from two natural slopes Australian. Geomech J G7:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung CJF, Fabbri AG, Westen CJV (1995) Multivariate regression analysis for landslide Hazard zonation. Kluwer, the Netherlands

  • Constantin M, Bednarik M, Jurchescu MC, Vlaicu M (2011) Landslide susceptibility assessment using the bivariate statistical analysis and the index of entropy in the Sibiciu Basin (Romania) environmental. Earth Sci 63:397–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisci GM, Iovine G, Di Gregorio S, Lupiano V (2008) Lava-flow hazard on the SE flank of Mt. Etna (southern Italy). J Volcanol Geotherm Res 177:778–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosta GB, Frattini P (2003) Distributed modelling of shallow landslides triggered by intense rainfall. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 3:81–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee CF, Li J, Xu ZW (2001) Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Environ Geol 40(3):381–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D'Amato Avanzi G, Giannecchini R, Puccinelli A (2004) The influence of the geological and geomorphological settings on shallow landslides. An example in a temperate climate environment: the June 19, 1996 event in northwestern Tuscany (Italy). Eng Geol 73(3):215–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D'Ambrosio D, Spataro W, Iovine G (2006) Parallel genetic algorithms for optimising cellular automata models of natural complex phenomena: an application to debris flows. Comput Geosci 32:861–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devkota KC, Regmin AD, Pourghasemi HR, Yoshida K, Pradhan B, Ryu IC, Dhital MR, Althuwaynee OF (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using certainty factor, index of entropy and logistic regression models in GIS and their comparison at Mugling-Narayanghat road section in Nepal Himalaya. Nat Hazards 65:135–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di BF, Chen NS, Cui P, Li ZL, He YP, Gao YC (2008) GIS-based risk analysis of debris flow: an application in Sichuan, Southwest China. Int J Sediment Res 23(2):138–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieu TB, Pradhan B, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick OB (2012) Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam: a comparison of the Levenberg-Marquardt and Bayesian regularized neural networks. Geomorphology 171:12–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong JJ, Lee CT, Tung YH, Liu CN, Lin KP, Lee JF (2009) The role of the sediment budget in understanding debris flow susceptibility. Earth Surf Process Landform 34:1612–1624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis EC (2011) Anthropogenic transformation of the terrestrial biosphere. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 369:1010–1035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C (2004) Use of fuzzy relations to produce landslide susceptibility map of a landslide prone area (West Black Sea region, Turkey). Eng Geol 75:229–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ermini L, Catani F, Casagli N (2005) Artificial neural networks applied to landslide susceptibility assessment. Geomorphology 66(1):327–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez CI, Del Castillo TF, Hamdouni RE, Montero JC (1999) Verification of landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study. Earth Surf Proc Landf 24:537–544

  • Giannecchini R, Naldini D, Avanzi GDA, Puccinelli A (2007) Modelling of the initiation of rainfall-induced debris flows in the Cardoso basin (Apuan Alps, Italy). Quat Int 171:108–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokceoglu C, Aksoy H (1996) Landslide susceptibility mapping of the slopes in the residual soils of the Mengen region (Turkey) by deterministic stability analyses and image processing techniques. Eng Geol 44:147–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes RAT, Renato FG, Fernandes NF (2013) Combining spatial models for shallow landslides and debris-flows prediction. Rem Sens 5(5):2219–2237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez H, Kavzoglu T (2005) Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial neural networks in Jabonosa River basin. Venezuela Eng Geol 78:11–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorsevski PV, Glesser PE, Foltz RB (2000) Spatial prediction of landslide hazard using logistic regression and GIS. Trans GIS 10:395–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 31:181–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Cardinali M, Galli M, Ardizzone F (2005) Probabilistic landslide hazard assessment at the basin scale. Geomorphology 72:272–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M, Galli M (2006) Estimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models. Geomorphology 81:166–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hearn GJ (1995) Landslide and erosion hazard mapping at ok Tedi copper mine, Papua New Guinea quarterly. J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 28:47–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckmann T, Gegg K, Gegg A, Becht M (2014) Sample size matters: investigating the effect of sample size on a logistic regression susceptibility model for debris flows. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 14:259–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iovine G, D'Ambrosio D, Di Gregorio S (2005) Applying genetic algorithms for calibrating a hexagonal cellular automata model for the simulation of debris flows characterised by strong inertial effects. Geomorphology 66:287–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives JD, Messerli B (1981) Mountain hazards mapping in Nepal introduction to an applied mountain research project. Mount Res Dev 1:223–230

  • Kang ZC, Li ZF, Ma AN, Luo JT (2004) Debris flow research in China. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Komac M (2006) A landslide susceptibility model using the analytical hierarchy process method and multivariate statistics in perialpine Slovenia. Geomorphology 74(1):17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan H, Wu F, Zhou C, Wang S (2002) Analysis on susceptibility of GIS based landslide triggering factors in Yunnan Xiaojiang watershed. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 21:1500–1506

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Pradhan B (2007) Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Landslides 4:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Sambath T (2006) Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Damrei Romel area, Cambodia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Environ Geol 50:847–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Talib JA (2005) Probabilistic landslide susceptibility and factor effect analysis. Environ Geol 47:982–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang WJ, Zhuang DF, Jiang D, Pan JJ, Ren HY (2012) Assessment of debris flow hazards using a Bayesian network. Geomorphology 171:94–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu GY, Long SC, Wong DW (2007) Vulnerability assessment of rainfall-induced debris flows in Taiwan. Nat Hazards 43:223–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nandi A, Shakoor A (2009) A GIS-based landslide susceptibility evaluation using bivariate and multivariate statistical analyses. Eng Geol 110(1–2):11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh HJ, Lee S (2011) Cross-application used to validate landslide susceptibility maps using a probabilistic model from Korea. Environ Earth Sci 64:395–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlmacher GC, Davis JC (2003) Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in Northeast Kansas. USA Eng Geol 69:331–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal M, Mather PM (2003) An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification. Remote Sens Environ 86:554–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paudel B, Zhang YL, Li SC, Liu LS, Xue, Wu X, Khanal NR (2016) Review of studies on land use and land cover change in Nepal. J Mt Sci 13(4):643–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Mohammady M, Pradhan B (2012a) Landslide susceptibility mapping using index of entropy and conditional probability models in GIS: Safarood Basin. Iran Catena 97:71–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Pradhan B, Gokceoglu C (2012b) Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed. Iran Nat Hazards 63:965–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Moradi HR, Aghda SMF (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping by binary logistic regression, analytical hierarchy process, and statistical index models and assessment of their performances. Nat Hazards 69:749–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B (2010) Application of an advanced fuzzy logic model for landslide susceptibility analysis international. J Comput Intel Syst 3:370–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regmi NR, Giardino JR, Mcdonald EV, Vitek JD (2014) A comparison of logistic regression-based models of susceptibility to landslides in western Colorado, USA. Landslides 11(2):247–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revellino P, Guadagno FM, Hungr O (2008) Morphological methods and dynamic modelling in landslide hazard assessment of the Campania Apennine carbonate slope. Landslides 5(1):59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RGSTY Regional Geological Survey Team of the Yunnan Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources (1982) Regional Geological Survey Report of the People’s Republic of China: Guxue Image (Scale: 1:200,000). People’s Republic of China

  • Ruan SY, Huang RQ (2001) Application of GIS-based information model on assessment of geological hazards risk. J Chengdu Univ Technol 28(1):89–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupke J, Cammeraat E, Seijmonsbergen AC et al (1988) Engineering geomorphology of the widentobel catchment, Appenzell and Sankt Gallen, Switzerland-a geomorphologuical inventory system applied to geotechnical appraisal of slope stability. Eng Geol 26:33–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saito H, Nakayama D, Matsuyama H (2009) Comparison of landslide susceptibility based on a decision-tree model and actual landslide occurrence: the Akaishi Mountains Japan. Geomorphology 109:108–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar S, Kanungo DP, Patra AK, Kumar P (2008) GiS based spatial data analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping. J Mt Sci 5:52–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi MY, Chen JP, Song Y, Zhang W, Song SY, Zhang XD (2016) Assessing debris flow susceptibility in Heshigten banner, Inner Mongolia, China, using principal component analysis and an improved fuzzy C-means algorithm. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75:909–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W, Crutzen J, McNeill JR (2007) The anthropocene: are humans now over-whelming the great forces of nature? Ambio 36:614–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang GA, Yang X (2006) Analysis tutorial of geographic information system. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang C, Zhu J, Li WL, Liang JT (2009) Rainfall-triggered debris flows following the Wenchuan earthquake. Bull Eng Geol Environ 68(2):187–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarolli P, Sofia G (2016) Human topographic signatures and derived geomorphic processes across landscapes. Geomorphology 255:140–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tie YB, Tang C (2006) Application of AHP in single debris flow risk assessment. Chin J Geol Hazard Control 17:79–84 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsangaratos P, Ilia I (2016) Landslide susceptibility mapping using a modified decision tree classifier in the Xanthi perfection. Greece Landslides 13:305–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan S, Lei TC (2009) A knowledge-based decision support system to analyze the debris-flow problems at Chen-Yu-Lan River. Taiwan Knowl Based Syst 2(8):580–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang PF, Chen J, Dai FC, Long W, Xu C, Sun JM, Cui ZJ (2014) Chronology of relict lake deposits around the Suwalong paleolandslide in the upper Jinsha River, SE Tibetan plateau: implications to Holocene tectonic perturbations. Geomorphology 217(2):193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieczorek GF, Glade T (2005) Climatic factors influencing occurrence of debris flows. In: Jakob M, Hungr O (eds) Debris-flow hazards and related phenomena. Springer, Berlin, pp 325–362

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E (2013) Wilderness is dead: whither critical zone studies and geomorphology in the Anthropocene? Anthropocene 2:4–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu WM, Sidle RC (1995) A distributed lope stability model for steep forested basins. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci Geomech Abst 31(4):178A–178A

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu S, Chen J, Cui Z (2017) Early pleistocene debris-flow deposits in the upper Jinsha River, Sw China and their paleoenvironmental implications. J Geol Geophys 6:314. https://doi.org/10.4172/2381-8719.1000314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C (2010) Gis platform and certainty factor analysis method based wenchuan earthquake-induced landslide susceptibility evaluation. J Eng Geol 18:15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu XW, Zhang PZ, Wen XZ, Qin ZL, Chen GH, Zhu AL (2005) Features of active tectonics and recurrence behaviors of strong earthquakes in the western Sichuan province and its adjacent regions. Seismol Geol 27(3):446–461. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Q, Zhang S, Li WL, Asch TWJV (2012) The 13 august 2010 catastrophic debris flows after the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, China. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12(1):201–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Xu X, Yao Q, Wang Y (2013a) GIS-based bivariate statistical modelling for earthquake triggered landslides susceptibility mapping related to the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, China. Q J Eng Geol Hydroge 46(2):221–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu WB, Yu WJ, Jing SC, Zhang GP, Huang JX (2013b) Debris flow susceptibility assessment by GIS and information value model in a large-scale region, Sichuan Province (China). Nat Hazards 65(3):1379–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin A (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of results and confirmations. Catena 72:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao X, Tham LG, Dai FC (2008) Landslide susceptibility mapping based on support vector machine: a case study on natural slopes of Hong Kong. Chin Geomorphol 101(4):572–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I (2007) GIS based susceptibility mapping of karst depression in gypsum: a case study from Sivas basin (Turkey). Eng Geol 90:89–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I (2010) The effect of the sampling strategies on the landslide susceptibility mapping by conditional probability and artificial neural networks. Environ Earth Sci 60:505–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang RZ (1998) Dry valleys in the Hengduan mountains region. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Chen JP, Wang Q, An Y, Qian X, Xiang L, He L (2013) Susceptibility analysis of large-scale debris flows based on combination weighting and extension methods. Nat Hazards 66:1073–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou W, Tang C (2014) Rainfall thresholds for debris flow initiation in the Wenchuan earthquake stricken area, southwestern China. Landslides 11(5):877–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu LF, Wu XC, Yin KL, Liu XG (2004) Risk zonation of landslide in China based on information content model. J Earth Sci Environ 26(3):52–56

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants nos. 41571012 and 41230743); and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant no. 2652015060). We sincerely thank the anonymous reviewers for their time and effort devoted to improving the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, S., Chen, J., Zhou, W. et al. A modified Logit model for assessment and validation of debris-flow susceptibility. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78, 4421–4438 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1412-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1412-5

Keywords

Navigation