Advertisement

Effect of joint type on the shear behavior of synthetic rock

  • Yifei CuiEmail author
Original Paper
  • 334 Downloads

Abstract

The shear behavior of the discontinuities of rock is important because it is closely related to the stability of a rock mass. The scientific challenge lies in the understanding of how different types of joint are related to the failure criterion. In the current study, direct shear tests are used to investigate the shear behavior of continuous planar joints, stepped joints, and discontinuous open joints. The joints were cast in a synthetic rock made of plaster, sand, and water and tested under normal stresses that ranged from 50 kPa to 3.5 MPa. The shear behavior of both the continuous and discontinuous joints has been found to be dependent on the normal stress. At normal stresses above the magnitude of the tensile strength, continuous and discontinuous joints displayed either strain weakening or brittle behavior. Results with the combination of all joint types indicated that the shear strength of the different types of joint increases sharply at low normal stress, and then approaches a lower bound residual strength envelope at high normal stress. At normal stresses of less than the tensile strength (1.84 MPa), the strength is dominated by cohesion, while at normal stresses greater than the tensile strength, friction appears to dominate the shear strength. For open joints, the shear stiffness is independent of the normal stress. For closed joints, the shear stiffness will increase as the normal stress increases, particularly evident below a normal stress of 1 MPa. Increasing the normal stress reduces the brittleness index of rock samples from 1 to 0. A primary reason for this non-unique failure envelope was the large dilation that occurred at high normal stresses. This dilation was attributed to grain crushing, and the roughness resulting from this crushing and gouge formation as shearing occurred.

Keywords

Direct shear test Synthetic rock Joint type Shear strength Shear stiffness Brittleness index 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to acknowledge Professor Derek Martin at the University of Alberta for the continuous guidance with the experimental test and data interpolation. The support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada is also acknowledged.

References

  1. Bahaaddini M, Hagan PC, Mitra R, Hebblewhite BK (2015) Parametric study of smooth joint parameters on the shear behaviour of rock joints. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48(3):923–940Google Scholar
  2. Bandis SC, Lumsden AC, Barton NR (1983) Fundamentals of rock joint deformation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomecha Abstr 20(6):249–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barton N (1973) Review of a new shear-strength criterion for rock joints. Eng Geol 7(4):287–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barton N (1976) The shear strength of rock and rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 13(10):1–24Google Scholar
  5. Barton N (2013) Shear strength criteria for rock, rock joints, rockfill and rock masses: problems and some solutions. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 5:249–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barton NR, Bandis SC (1982) Effects of block size on the shear behaviour of jointed rock. 23rd U.S. Symposium on rock mechanics, Berkeley, CA, USA, 739–760Google Scholar
  7. Bishop AW (1971) The influence of progressive failure on the choice of the method of stability analysis. Géotechnique 21(2):168–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brady BHG, Brown ET (1985) Rock mechanics for underground mining. Allen & Unwin, London, pp 86–126Google Scholar
  9. Camones LAM, Vargas EDA Jr, Figueiredo RPD, Velloso RQ (2013) Application of the discrete element method for modeling of rock crack propagation and coalescence in the step-path failure mechanism. Eng Geol 158(8):80–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Casagrande D, Buzzi O, Giacomini A, Lambert C, Fenton G (2017) A new stochastic approach to predict peak and residual shear strength of natural rock discontinuities. Rock Mech Rock Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-017-1302-3
  11. Cho N, Martin CD, Sego DC (2008) Development of a shear zone in brittle rock subjected to direct shear. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45:1335–1346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cho N, Martin CD, Sego DC, Jeon J (2010) Dilation and spalling in axially compressed beams subjected to bending. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43(2):123–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cui Y, Nouri A, Chan D, Rahmati E (2016) A new approach to DEM simulation of sand production. J Pet Sci Eng 147:56-67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cui Y, Chan D, Nouri A (2017a) Coupling of solid deformation and pore pressure for undrained deformation – a discrete element method approach. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 41(18):1943–1961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cui Y, Chan D, Nouri A (2017b) Discontinuum modelling of solid deformation pore water diffusion coupling. Int J Geomech 17(8):04017033.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000903 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gehle C, Kutter HK (2003) Breakage and shear behaviour of intermittent rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40(5):687–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huang D, Wang G (2017) Energy-compatible and spectrum-compatible (ECSC) ground motion simulation using wavelet packets. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 46 (11):1855-1873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang J, Xu S, Hu S (2014) Numerical investigations of the dynamic shear behavior of rough rock joints. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47(5):1727–1743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ISRM (1974) Suggested methods for determining shear strength. International Society for Rock Mechanics Commission on Standardization of Laboratory and Field Tests 1, pp 135–137Google Scholar
  20. ISRM (1978a) Suggested methods for determining the uniaxial compressive strength and deformability of rock materials. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 16(2):138–140Google Scholar
  21. ISRM (1978b) Suggested methods for determining tensile strength of rock materials. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 15:99–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jaeger JC (1971) Friction of rock and stability of rock slopes. Geotechnique 21(2):97–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jennings JE (1970) Mathematical theory for the calculation of the stability of slopes in open cast mines. Proceedings of the Theoretical Background to the Planning of Open Pit Mines with Special Reference to Slope Stability Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa, pp 87–102Google Scholar
  24. Kemeny J (2002) The time-dependent reduction of sliding cohesion due to rock bridges along discontinuities: a fracture mechanics approach. Rock Mech Rock Eng 36(1):27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kemeny J (2005) Time-dependent drift degradation due to the progressive failure of rock bridges along discontinuities. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 42:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ladanyi B, Archambault G (1970) Simulation of shear behavior of a jointed rock mass. In: Proceedings 11th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics (AIME), pp 105–125Google Scholar
  27. Lajtai EZ (1969) Strength of discontinuous rocks in direct shear. Géotechnique 19(2):218–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu Y, Xia C (2006) Study on models and strength behavior of rock mass containing discontinuous joints in direct shear. Chin J Geotech Eng 28(10):1242–1247Google Scholar
  29. Liu Y, Xia C (2007) Advances in research of rock masses containing discontinuous joints in direct shear test. Rock Soil Mech 28(8):1719–1724Google Scholar
  30. Meng F, Zhou H, Wang Z, Zhang L, Kong L, Li S, Zhang C, Hu S (2017) Experimental study of factors affecting fault slip rockbursts in deeply buried hard rock tunnels. Bull Eng Geol Environ 76:1167–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mo P, Li Y (2017) Estimating the three-dimensional joint roughness coefficient value of rock fractures. Bull Eng Geol Environ.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1150-0
  32. Müller L (1963) Der Felsbau. Enke, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  33. Oh J, Kim GW (2010) Effect of opening on the shear behavior of a rock joint. Bull Eng Geol Environ 69:389–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oh J, Li Y, Mitra R, Canbulat I (2017) A numerical study on dilation of a saw-toothed rock joint under direct shear. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50(4):913–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Özvan A, Dinçer İ, Acar A, Özvan B (2014) The effects of discontinuity surface roughness on the shear strength of weathered granite joints. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73:801–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Patton FD (1966) Multiple modes of shear failure in rock. Proc., First Congress of the International Society for Rock Mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal, pp 509–513Google Scholar
  37. Rosso RS (1976) A comparison of joint stiffness measurement in direct shear, Triaxial compression, and in situ. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomecha Abstr 13(6):167–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang P, Cai M, Ren F, Li C, Yang T (2017) A digital image-based discrete fracture network model and its numerical investigation of direct shear tests. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50(7):1801–1816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Xia C, Xiao W, Ding Z (2010) Modification of Jennings strength criterion for intermittent joints considering rock bridge weakening and joint surface undulating angle. Chin J Geotech Eng 29(3):485–492Google Scholar
  40. Zhou GGD, Sun QC (2013) Three-dimensional numerical study on flow regimes of dry granular flows by DEM. Powder Technol 239:115-127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhu H, Zhang LM (2013) Characterizing geotechnical anisotropic spatial variations using random field theory. Can Geotechn J 50 (7):723-734CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringThe Hong Kong University of Science and TechnologyKowloonChina

Personalised recommendations