Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Selection of TBM and geotechnical assessment of a microtunnel in a difficult geological environment: a case of a natural gas pipeline beneath an active landslide (Albania)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This present paper presents an adopted methodology for Micro Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) selection, based on the results of a geological-geotechnical feasibility assessment of a microtunnel, planned for a natural gas pipeline beneath an active landslide, in the Corovode area, southern Albania. This example offers an excellent case study of diverse and demanding engineering geological formations, namely disturbed and sheared types of flysch rock masses, but also recent soil deposits. A tunnel drive will confront materials that may be prone to posing challenges, such as ravelling ground at the microtunnel face, chimney failures, water inflows, as well as deformations. The selection of the appropriate tunnelling method procedure is analysed and presented step by step, addressing all issues that cover the most critical aspects of the selection process. Finally, a geotechnical feasibility assessment is presented as an overall analysis of this work, taking into consideration all the crucial design parameters for several Micro TBM types along the tunnel. Besides the expected rock mass behaviour, the TBM selection is also based on the percentage of fines at the tunnel excavation profile, the permeability and hydraulic head, which is also investigated in this study, while sticky behaviour, clogging risk, presence of obstacles and mixed ground conditions are also taken into account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AITES-ITA Working Group No. 14 (2000) Recommendations and Guidelines for Tunnel Boring Machines (TBMs), www.ita-aites.org

  • Barla G, Pelizza S (2000) TBM tunnelling in difficult ground conditions. Geo Eng 2000, Melbourne

  • Bergeson W (2014) Review of long drive microtunnelling technology for use on large scale projects. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 39(2014):66–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski Z.T, Tamames B.C, Fernandez J.M.G, Hernandez M.A (2006) Rock mass excavability (RME) indicator: new way to selecting the optimum tunnel construction method. In: ITA-AITES World Tunnel Congress & 32nd ITA General Assembly, Seoul, Korea

  • BTS-ICE (2005) Closed – face Tunnelling machines and ground stability, a guideline for best practice, British Tunnelling society in association with the Institution of Civil Engineers. Thomas Telford Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein H.H, Dudt J.P, Halabe V.B, Descoudres F (1992) Decision aids in tunnelling – principle and practical application, Monograph. Swiss Federation Office of Transportation

  • Farrokh E, Rostami J (2009) Effect of adverse geological condition on TBM operation in Ghomroud tunnel conveyance project. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 24:436–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GeodataS.p.A. (1995) Report: Review of alternative construction methods and feasibility of proposed methods for constructing Attiko Metro Extension of Line 3 to Egaleo, Attiko Metro S.A., 191–193 Messoghion Ave., 11525 Athens, Greece

  • Gong Q, Yin L, Mab H, Zhao J (2016) TBM tunnelling under adverse geological conditions: an overview. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 57:4–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandori R, Gager M, Antonini F, Vigle A (1995) Evinos-Mornos tunnel – Greece. In: Proceedings of the Rapid Excavation & Tunnelling Conference, pp. 747–767

  • Guetter W, Weber W (2001) Two tunnels in totally different geological formations driven by the same 7m double-shield TBM with an extremely thin-walled monoshell honeycomb segmental lining system. Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conference

  • Hoek E, Marinos P (2000) Predicting tunnel squeezing. Tunnels and Tunnelling International Part 1: November, 45–51. Part 2: December, pp. 34–36

  • Kavvadas M, Litsas D, Fortsakis P, Prountzopoulos G, Tzivakos K, Chortis P (2013) Report on the State-of-Art with Collection of Data from TBM Tunnelling, NETTUN Research Objective, Measurement of Excavated Materials Volume in TBM tunnelling (WP-9), In: Controlling the impact of tunnelling on surrounding structures

  • Langmaack L (2002) Soil conditioning for TBM-Chances and limits, Journées d’études internationales de Toulouse, Underground works: Living structures, AFTES

  • Maidl B, Herrenknecht M, Maidl U, Wehrmeyer G (2012) Mechanised shield tunnelling, Ernst & Sohn

  • Marinos V (2012) Assessing rock mass behaviour for tunnelling. Environ Eng Geosci 18(4):327–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinos V (2014) Tunnel behaviour and support associated with the weak rock masses of flysch. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 6(3):227–239

  • Marinos V (2017) A revised, geotechnical classification GSI system for tectonically disturbed heterogeneous rock masses, such as flysch. Bull Eng Geol Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1151-z (online first)

  • Marinos P, Hoek E (2000) GSI: a geologically friendly tool for rock mass strength estimation, In: Proceedings of the GeoEng2000 at the international conference on geotechnical and geological engineering, Melbourne, Technomic publishers, Lancaster, pp. 1422–1446

  • Marinos V, Fortsakis P, Prountzopoulos G (2011) Estimation of geotechnical properties and classification of geotechnical behaviour in tunnelling for flysch rock masses, In: Anagnostopoulos, A. Pachakis, M. & Tsatsanifos, C. (eds), Geotechnics of Hard Soils – Weak Rocks, Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Athens, Greece, 12–15 September, 1: 435–440. Amsterdam: IOS Press

  • Nord G, Stille H (1988) Bore and blast techniques in difficult types of rock: Sweden’s experience. Int J Tunnel Underground Space Technol 3(1):45–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pipe Jacking Association (1995) An introduction to pipe jacking and microtunnelling design. UK, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahriar K, Sharifzadeh M, Hamidi JK (2008) Geotechnical risk assessment based approach for rock TBM selection in difficult ground conditions. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 23:318–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thewes M, Burger W (2004) Clogging risks for TBM drives in clay, Tunnels & Tunnelling International, June, pp. 28–31

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge “E.ON Technologies GmbH (Currently Uniper GmbH)” S.A for funding the research programme “Assessment of Earthquake Loading & Seismic Response of TAP Project". Thanks are extended to Theodoros Stimaratzis for his contribution in the site investigation field work of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vassilis Marinos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marinos, V., Stoumpos, G., Papouli, D. et al. Selection of TBM and geotechnical assessment of a microtunnel in a difficult geological environment: a case of a natural gas pipeline beneath an active landslide (Albania). Bull Eng Geol Environ 78, 1795–1813 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1241-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1241-6

Keywords

Navigation