In many geo-engineering fields, the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of a rock material is the parameter most commonly used to define a rock’s mechanical strength. Several international standards have been developed for determining this value, which require the tested material to have certain minimum dimensions and shapes. In many applications, however, sample material is limited. Therefore, this study investigates the possibility of determining the UCS on rock plugs smaller than the minimum dimensions in the most common standards. The materials investigated are four different depositional limestones from the Paris Basin which are often used as building material in France and Belgium. Results from UCS tests in a small-scale uniaxial compressive device are compared to standard-sized tests according to the governing international standards. The results show that the strength determined on the small-scale plugs is very similar to the UCS determined on standard-sized cores. Using high-resolution X-ray computed tomography, it was possible to investigate the failure modes of the small-scale plugs and link them to their internal rock fabric. Obtaining a three-dimensional visualization provides valuable insights into the origin of the variability in the UCS measurements in small-scale plugs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Al-rkaby AHJ, Alafandi ZMS (2015) Size effect on the unconfined compressive strength and Modulus of elasticity of limestone rock. Electron J Geotech Eng 20:5143–5149
ASTM C170/C170M-16 (2016) Standard test method for compressive strength of dimension stone. In: Book of ASTM standards, volume 04.07. West Conshohocken, PA
Basu A, Mishra DA, Roychowdhury K (2013) Rock failure modes under uniaxial compression, Brazilian, and point load tests. Bull Eng Geol Environ 72:457–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0505-4
Benavente D, Garcı́a del Cura MA, Fort R, Ordóñez S (2004) Durability estimation of porous building stones from pore structure and strength. Eng Geol 74:113–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGGEO.2004.03.005
Bieniawski ZT, Bernede MJ (1979) Suggested methods for determining the uniaxial compressive strength and deformability of rock materials. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 16:137. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(79)91450-5
C170/C170M-16 (2016) Standard test method for compressive strength of dimension stone. West Conshohocken, PA
Chang C, Zoback MD, Khaksar A (2006) Empirical relations between rock strength and physical properties in sedimentary rocks. J Pet Sci Eng 51:223–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2006.01.003
Cnudde V, Boone MN (2013) High-resolution X-ray computed tomography in geosciences: a review of the current technology and applications. Earth-Sci Rev 123:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.04.003
Derluyn H, Dewanckele J, Boone MN et al (2014) Crystallization of hydrated and anhydrous salts in porous limestone resolved by synchrotron X-ray microtomography. Nucl Inst Methods Phys Res Sect B Beam Interact Mater Atoms 324:102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2013.08.065
Dierick M, Van Loo D, Masschaele B et al (2014) Recent micro-CT scanner developments at UGCT. Nucl Inst Methods Phys Res Sect B Beam Interact Mater Atoms 324:35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2013.10.051
Dunham RJ (1962) Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional texture. Am Assoc Pet Geol Mem 1:108–121
Eberhardt E, Stead D, Stimpson B (1999) Quantifying progressive pre-peak brittle fracture damage in rock during uniaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36:361–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-9062(99)00019-4
Fronteau G, Moreau C, Thomachot-Schneider C, Barbin V (2010) Variability of some Lutetian building stones from the Paris Basin, from characterisation to conservation. Eng Geol 115:158–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.08.001
Hawkins AB (1998) Aspects of rock strength. Bull Eng Geol Environ 57:17–30
Hoek E, Brown ET (1980) Underground excavations in rock. Institution of Mining & Metallurgy
Ji Y, Baud P, Vajdova V, Wong T -f (2012) Characterization of pore geometry of Indiana limestone in relation to mechanical compaction. Oil Gas Sci Technol – Rev IFP Energies Nouv 67:753–775. https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2012051
Kahraman S (2001) Evaluation of simple methods for assessing the uniaxial compressive strength of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38:981–994. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(01)00039-9
Liang CY, Zhang QB, Li X, Xin P (2016) The effect of specimen shape and strain rate on uniaxial compressive behavior of rock material. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75:1669–1681
Lockner D (1993) The role of acoustic emission in the study of rock fracture. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 30:883–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(93)90041-B
Makhloufi Y, Collin PY, Bergerat F et al (2013) Impact of sedimentology and diagenesis on the petrophysical properties of a tight oolitic carbonate reservoir. The case of the Oolithe Blanche formation (Bathonian, Paris Basin, France). Mar Pet Geol 48:323–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.08.021
Masschaele BC, Cnudde V, Dierick M et al (2007) UGCT: new X-ray radiography and tomography facility. Nucl Inst Methods Phys Res Sect A Accel Spectrometers, Detect Assoc Equip 580:266–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2007.05.099
Paterson MS, Wong T (2005) Experimental rock deformation-the brittle field. Springer Science & Business Media
Roels S, Elsen J, Carmeliet J, Hens H (2001) Characterisation of pore structure by combining mercury porosimetry and micrography. Mater Struct Constr 34:76–82
Siegesmund S, Dürrast H (2011) Physical and Mechanical Properties of Rocks. In: Stone in Architecture - Properties, Durability. pp 97–224
Szwedzicki T, Shamu W (1999) The effect of discontinuities on strength of rock samples. Proc Aust Inst Min Metall 304:23–28
Thuro K, Plinninger RJ, Zäh S, Schütz S (2001) Scale effects in rock strength properties. Part 1: unconfined compressive test and Brazilian test. In: Särkkä E (ed) ISRM regional symposium Eurorock. Espoo, Finland, pp 169–174
Tuncay E, Hasancebi N (2009) The effect of length to diameter ratio of test specimens on the uniaxial compressive strength of rock. Bull Eng Geol Environ 68:491–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-009-0227-9
UNE-EN 1926 (2007) NBN EN 1926:2007 Natural stone test methods - Determination of uniaxial compressive strength. Eur Comm Stand
UNE-EN 1936 (2006) NBN EN 1936: Natural stone test method. Determination of Real Density and Apparent Density, and of Total and Open Porosity. Eur Comm Stand 3
The Special Research Fund (BOF) at Ghent University is acknowledged for the finalizing PhD grant 01DI1316 for Jeroen Van Stappen. Tim De Kock is a postdoctoral fellow of the Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO) and acknowledges its support. FWO is also acknowledged for funding project G.0041.15 N which allowed the purchase of the uniaxial compressive device. For this, the Faculty Commission for Scientific Research (FCWO) at Ghent University is also acknowledged for its support.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Van Stappen, J.F., De Kock, T., De Schutter, G. et al. Uniaxial compressive strength measurements of limestone plugs and cores: a size comparison and X-ray CT study. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78, 5301–5310 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-01448-0
- Uniaxial compressive strength
- High-resolution X-ray tomography
- Building stones
- Failure modes