Abstract
In this work, the influence of the length-to-diameter ratio (L/D) on the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of cohesive soil specimens was assessed. An L/D ratio of between 2 and 3 is generally recommended by accepted scientific and technical authorities. Nevertheless, published reports on the effect of specimen shape on soil strength are scarce. Therefore, we determined the effect of specimen shape on the UCS values of four clay soils by testing compacted cylindrical specimens with L/D ratios ranging from 0.5 to 3. The test results indicated that the UCS value decreases significantly with increasing L/D ratio. This decrease becomes particularly steep when the L/D ratio exceeds 1, but then becomes less steep when the L/D ratio is between 1.25 and 2.5. In addition, the failure pattern generally changes from ductile to brittle and the failure mechanism develops in quite complex and obscure ways when the L/D ratio is ≥2.75. Based on an analysis of the results, correction formulae with strong statistical relationships were determined for the soils tested in this study. Nonetheless, further investigation is needed to check the validity of the equations derived for these soils.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aktaş M (1991) Influence of specimen diameter on shear strength parameters of clay soils (Z-805). General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works, Ankara, p 43 (In Turkish)
ASTM (1994) Annual book of ASTM standards, volume 04.08. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken
ASTM (2002a) ASTM D 2166-00: Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil. In: Annual book of ASTM standards. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, pp 1–6
ASTM (2002b) ASTM D 2487-00: Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). In: Annual book of ASTM standards. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, pp 1–12
ASTM (2002c) ASTM D 422-63: Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils. In: Annual book of ASTM standards. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, pp 1–8
ASTM (2002d) ASTM D 4318-00: Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. In: Annual book of ASTM standards. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, pp 1–14
ASTM (2002e) ASTM D 698-00a: Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort (12,400 ft-lbf/ft3(600 kN-m/m3)). In: Annual book of ASTM standards. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, pp 1–7
ASTM (2002f) ASTM D 854-02: Standard test method for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer. In: Annual book of ASTM standards. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, pp 1–7
BSI (1990) BS 1377: British Standard Methods of Test for Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes. Part 7: Shear strength tests (total stress) tests. British Standards Institution, London
Das BM (2002) Soil mechanics laboratory manual, 6th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 216
Hampton D (1958) Effect of rate of strain on the strength of remolded soil. Publication FHWA/IN/JHRP-58/17. Joint Highway Research Project, Indiana Department of Transportation and Purdue University, West Lafayette, p 71
Hawkins AB (1998) Aspects of rock strength. Bull Eng Geol Environ 57:17–30
Japanese Standards Association (1993) JIS A 1216: Method for unconfined compression tests. Japanese Standards Association, Tokyo, 1–11 (In Japanese)
John M (1972) The influence of length to diameter ratio on rock properties in uniaxial compression: a contribution to standardization in rock mechanics testing. Rep S Afr CSIR ME1083:5
Kahraman S, Alber M (2006) Estimating unconfined compressive strength and elastic modulus of a fault breccia mixture of weak blocks and strong matrix. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43–8:1277–1287
Kamei T, Tokida M (1991) Influence of specimen size on unconfined compressive strength and deformation characteristics of cohesive soils. Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu 436:131–134 (In Japanese)
Kim T, Kim T, Kang G, Ge L (2012) Factors influencing crack-induced tensile strength of compacted soil. J Mater Civ Eng 24(3):315–320
Kulhawy FH, Mayne PW (1990) Manual of estimating soil properties for foundation design. Geotechnical Engineering Group, Cornell University, Ithaca, p 273
Matsui T, Oda K, Nabeshima Y (1994) Development and applications for natural deposits of minimum triaxial compression apparatus. Tsuchi to kiso 42(11):17–22 (in Japanese)
Mitchell JK (1976) Fundamentals of soil behavior. Wiley, New York, p 422
Mogi K (1966) Some precise measurements of fracture strength of rocks under uniform compressive stress. Felsmech Ingenieurgeol 4:41–55
Mogi K (2007) Experimental rock mechanics. Taylor and Francis, London, p 361
Obert L, Windes SL, Duvall WI (1946) Standardized tests for determining the physical properties of mine rocks. US Bureau of Mines Report of Investigations 3891. US Bureau of Mines, Washington, DC
Smith GN (1986) Probability and statistics in civil engineering. Collins, London, p 244
Turkish Standards Institution (2006) TS 1900-2: Methods of testing soils for civil engineering purposes in the laboratory. Annual book of ASTM standards, part 2: determination of mechanical properties. In: Annual book of Turkish standards. Turkish Standards Institution, Ankara, 27–29
Türk N, Dearman WR (1986) A correction equation on the influence of length-to-diameter ratio on the uniaxial compressive strength of rocks. Eng Geol 22:293–300
Ünlü T, Yılmaz O (2008) Investigation of the shape effect on the uniaxial compressive strength of the intact rock. In: Türk, N, Deliormanlı AH, Kıncal C (eds), 9th regional rock mechanics symposium İzmir, Turkey, pp 121–141
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Güneyli, H., Rüşen, T. Effect of length-to-diameter ratio on the unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil specimens. Bull Eng Geol Environ 75, 793–806 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0835-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-015-0835-5