Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of fracture aperture and filling material on GPR signal

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) was used to locate fractures and distinguish fracture properties at the laboratory and field scales. Laboratory studies were performed to define the effects of fractures on the GPR signal. In the laboratory, a fracture between two blocks of crystalline rock was filled with water or air, and the aperture of the fracture was varied from 0.75 to 10 cm. Air-filled and water-filled fractures were successfully distinguished on the basis of GPR signal polarity changes. Moreover, it was possible to estimate the fracture aperture when it was wider than the vertical resolution of the antenna. For instance, the resolution of a 800-MHz antenna enables the detection of 1-cm-wide water-filled openings. Armed with knowledge of the signal behavior at the laboratory scale, the apertures and the filling materials of fractures were also estimated in uncontrolled field conditions. These field studies were carried out in a dimension stone quarry of migmatitic granodiorite located in Southern Finland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig.5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Qadi IL, Lahouar S (2004) Ground penetrating radar: state of the practice for pavement assessment. Mater Eval 62(7):759–763

    Google Scholar 

  • Annan AP (2003) Subsurface imaging solutions. In: Ground penetrating radar: principles, procedures & applications. Sensors & Software Inc., Mississauga

  • Annan AP (2009) Electromagnetic principles of ground penetrating radar. In: Jol HM (ed) Ground penetrating radar: theory and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy NJ (2009) Electrical and magnetic properties of rock, soil and fluids. In: Jol HM (ed) Ground penetrating radar: theory and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 41–72

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grandjean G, Gourry JC (1996) GPR data processing for 3D fracture mapping in a marble quarry (Thassos, Greece). J Appl Geophys 36:19–30. doi:10.1016/S0926-9851(96)00029-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasmueck M (1996) 3-D ground-penetrating radar applied to fracture imaging in gneiss. Geophysics 61(4):1050–1064. doi:10.1190/1.1444026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halleux L, Grégoire C (2002) Characterization of fractures by GPR in a mining environment. First Break 20(7):467–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Hokkanen T, Korhonen K, Virtanen H, Laine EL (2007) Effects of the fracture water of bedrock on superconducting gravimeter data. Near Surf Geophys 5(2):133–139. doi:10.3997/1873-0604.200602

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai WL, Kind T, Wiggenhauser H (2011) Frequency-dependent dispersion of high-frequency radar wave in concrete. NDT&E Int 44:267–273. doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2010.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane JW, Buursink ML, Haeni FP, Versteeg RJ (2000) Evaluation of ground-penetrating radar to detect free-phase hydrocarbons in fractured rocks—results of numerical modeling and physical experiments. Ground Water 38(6):929–938. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2000.tb00693.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luodes H (2008) Natural stone assessment with ground penetrating radar. Est J Earth Sci 57(3):149–155. doi:10.3176/earth.2008.3.03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Gracia V, Di Capua D, Gonzáles-Drigo R, Pujades L (2009) Laboratory characterization of GPR antenna for high-resolution testing: radiation pattern and vertical resolution. NDT&E Int 42:336–344. doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2008.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porsani JL, Sauck WA, Júnior AOS (2006) GPR for mapping fractures and as a guide for the extraction of ornamental granite from a quarry: a case study from southern Brazil. J Appl Geophys 58:177–187. doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2005.05.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prissang P, Hellä P, Lehtimäki T, Saksa P, Nummela J, Vuento A (2004) Identification of mineable blocks in dimension stone rock masses. In: Hardygora M, Paszkowska G, Sikora M (eds) Mine planning and equipment selection. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 69–74

  • Rial FI, Pereira M, Lorenzo H, Arias P, Novo A (2009) Resolution of GPR bowtie antennas: an experimental approach. J Appl Geophys 67:367–373. doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandmeier KJ (1998–2011) Reflexw, version 6.0. WindowsTM 9x/NT/2000/XP/7-program for the processing of seismic, acoustic or electromagnetic reflection, refraction and transmission data. K.J. Sandmeier, Karlsruhe

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Docent Olavi Selonen at Åbo Akademi and Palin Granit Oy for providing the rock blocks. This study was financed by the Finnish Research Programme on Nuclear Waste Management and the Finnish Foundation for Technology Promotion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Markovaara-Koivisto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Markovaara-Koivisto, M., Hokkanen, T. & Huuskonen-Snicker, E. The effect of fracture aperture and filling material on GPR signal. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73, 815–823 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0566-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0566-4

Keywords

Navigation