Skip to main content
Log in

Definitions and engineering classifications of tropical lowland peats

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peat classification methods for engineering purposes and the main factors and aspects of these classification systems are discussed. Among the factors that enter into the classification of tropical lowland peats are the organic content and degree or level of humification (on the von Post scale). The organic content as a percentage of the total content determines whether an organic soil is classified as a slightly organic soil (3–20 % organic content), an organic soil (20–75 % organic content), or a peat (more than 75 % organic content). The ASTM standard method of classifying peat is outlined in the Standard Classification of Peat Samples by Laboratory Testing (ASTM D 4427), which includes the use of the ASTM D 5715 (fiber content by field testing for degree of humification) field test method. The von Post humification test (von Post classification system) involves squeezing the peat and the material that is extruded between the fingers, examining the material, and classifying the soil as belonging to one of ten (H1–H10) humification or decomposition categories. Peats are then further subdivided into fibric or fibrous peats (humification range of H1–H3), hemic or moderately decomposed peats (H4–H6), or sapric or amorphous peats (H7–H10). The classification of organic soil or peat for engineering purposes mainly involves using the ignition test (ASTM D 2974) to determine the organic content or determining the percentage of organic content lost on ignition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (2007) Alaska guide for description and classification of peat and organic soils-classification of peat and organic soil (effective 3/31/07). Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, Juneau, pp 5–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriesse JP (1974) The characteristics, agriculture potential and relamation problems of tropical lowland peats in south-east Asia. Departmentof Agriculture Research, Amsterdam, pp 63–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriesse JP (1988) Nature and management of tropical peat soils, 1st edn. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (1992) D4427: Standard classification of peat samples by laboratory testing. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  • ASTM (2000) D5715 Standard test method for estimating the degree of humification of peat and other organic soils (visual/manual method). ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  • ASTM (2007) D2974: Standard test methods for moisture, ash, and organic matter of peat and other organic soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  • ASTM (2010) D2487: Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  • Engineering Geology Working Group (2007) Guideline for engineering geological investigation in peat and soft soils. Minerals and Geoscience Department of Malaysia, Sabah

  • Huat BBK (2004) Organic and peat soils engineering. Universiti Putra Malaysia Press, Serdang, pp 146–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett PM (1995) Geoguide 6. Site investigations for organic soils and peat. J.K.R. Document 20709-0341-95. Institut Kerja Raya Malaysia, Sarawak

  • Kurbatov IM (1968) The question of the genesis of peat and its humic acids. In: Robertson RA (ed) Transactions of the 2nd International Peat Congress, Leningrad, vol 1. HMSO, Edinburgh, pp 133–137

  • Murtedza M, Padmanabhan E, Mei BLH, Siong WB (2002) The peat soils of Sarawak. STRAPEAT status report. University Malaysia Sarawak, Sarawak, pp 16–20

  • Muttalib A, Lim JS, Wong MH, Koonvai L (1991) Characterization, distribution, and utilization of peat in Malaysia. In: Aminuddid (ed) Proceedings of the International Symposium on Tropical Peatland. Kuching, Sarawak, pp 7–16

  • Paramananthan S (1998) Malaysian soil taxonomy-second approximation. A proposal for the classification of Malaysian soils. Malaysian Society for Soil Science and Param Agricultural Soil Surveys, Serdang

    Google Scholar 

  • Paramananthan S (2010) Keys to the identification of Malaysian soils according to parent materials (Mimeo). Param Agricultural Soil Surveys, Selangor

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley JL (1986) Laboratory methods for testing peat. Ontario Peatland Inventory Project, Sudbury, pp 108–112

  • Stanek W, Silc T (1977) Comparisons of four methods for determination of degree of peat humification (decomposition) with emphasis on the von Post Method. Department of Fisheries and the Environment, Canadian Forestry Service, Ottawa

  • Teng LS (1996) Orogenic collapse of the northern Taiwan mountain belt. Geology 24:949–952

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to all of the anonymous reviewers who contributed constructive comments that considerably improved this manuscript. The authors also acknowledge the IPPP grant PV018-2011A for financial support from the University of Malaya.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Aqeel Ashraf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zulkifley, M.T.M., Ng, T.F., Raj, J.K. et al. Definitions and engineering classifications of tropical lowland peats. Bull Eng Geol Environ 72, 547–553 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0520-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0520-5

Keywords

Navigation