Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Challenges and trends for geological modelling and visualisation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The successful execution of both large and complex construction projects and environmental and natural hazard assessments requires a precise definition of subsurface conditions. Over the past two decades, a series of sophisticated 3-D modelling technologies—collectively identified as geoscientific information systems, or GSIS—have been developed to address this subsurface characterisation need. Existing commercial systems reflect their historical origins. The modelling and visualisation process remains technically challenging. Rapid development of computer hardware and software, modern data base design concepts and expanded information transmission capabilities across the Internet are encouraging the greater use of GSIS technologies as they become cheaper and easier to use and integrate within corporate decision-support systems. The integration of GSIS with broader information management systems is not common, but limited initial experiences suggest that large benefits are likely to result.

Résumé

La réalisation de projets de construction de grande envergure de même que l’évaluation de risques naturels et environnementaux nécessitent une définition précise des conditions de subsurface. Durant les derniers vingt ans, un ensemble de techniques de modélisation tridimensionnelle, globalement identifiées comme Systèmes d’Informations Géoscientifiques (GSIS) a été développé pour répondre à cette demande. Les systèmes disponibles dans le commerce témoignent de leur genèse. L’amélioration de ces techniques de modélisation et de visualisation constitue toujours un défi à relever. Le rapide développement des matériels informatiques et des logiciels, les nouveaux concepts de bases de données et les possibilités de transmission des informations via Internet encouragent un usage grandissant des technologies GSIS qui deviennent moins coûteuses et plus faciles d’utilisation dans les processus de prise de décision des entreprises. L’intégration des GSIS aux systèmes de gestion des informations n’est pas commune, mais de premières expériences suggèrent que des bénéfices importants peuvent en être retirés.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold TL, Sullivan DJ, Harris MA, Fitzpatrick FA, Scudder BC, Ruhl PM, Hanchar DW, Stewart JS (1999) Environmental setting of the upper Illinois River Basin and implications for water quality. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4268, 67 p

  • Belcher RC, Paradis AR (1991) A mapping approach to three-dimensional modelling. In: Turner AK (ed) Three-dimensional modelling with geoscientific information systems. NATO ASI Series C: mathematical and physical sciences, vol 354. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 107–122

  • Bonham-Carter GF (1994) Geographic information systems for geoscientists: modelling with GIS. Pergamon/Elsevier, New York, p 31

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough PA (1986) Principles of geographical information systems for land resources assessment. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 39–41, 194

  • D’Agnese FA, Faunt CC, Turner AK, Hill MC (1997) Hydrogeologic evaluation and numerical simulation of the Death Valley regional ground water flow system, Nevada and California. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 96-4300, 124 p

  • D’Agnese FA, O’Brien GM (2003) Impact of geoinformatics on the emerging geoscience knowledge integration paradigm. In: Rosenbaum MS, Turner AK (eds) New paradigms in subsurface prediction. Lecture notes in the earth sciences, number 99, chapter 27. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 303–312

  • Denver LF, Phillips DC (1990) Stratigraphic geocellular modelling. Geobyte 5(1):45–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Dykes J, MacEachren AM, Kraak M-J (2004) Exploring geovisualization. Pergamon Press, New York, 700 p

  • Evans R (2003) Current themes, issues, and challenges concerning the prediction of subsurface conditions. In: Rosenbaum MS, Turner AK (eds) New paradigms in subsurface prediction. Lecture notes in the earth sciences, number 99, chapter 32. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 359–378

  • Gable CW, Trease HE, Cherry TA (1996) Automated grid generation from models of complex geologic structure and stratigraphy. Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-UR-96-1083, Los Alamos, New Mexico

  • Houlding SW (1991) The application of new 3-D computer modelling techniques to mining. In: Turner AK (ed) Three-dimensional modelling with geoscientific information systems. NATO ASI Series C: mathematical and physical sciences, vol 354. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 303–325

  • Houlding SW (1994) 3D geoscience modelling computer techniques for geological characterization. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 75–85, 131–142

  • Kelk B (1991) 3D modelling with geoscientific information systems: the problem. In: Turner AK (ed) Three-dimensional modelling with geoscientific information systems. NATO ASI Series C: mathematical and physical sciences, vol 354. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 29–38

  • Kelk B, Challen K (1992) Experiments with a CAD system for spatial modelling of geoscientific data. In: Vinken R (ed) Compiler from geoscientific map series to geo-information systems. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international colloquium, Wurzburg, Germany, September 9–11, 1989. Bundesanstalt fur Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, Hannover, Geologisches Jahrbuch, Reihe A, Heft, vol 122, pp 145–153

  • Knupp P, Steinberg S (1994) Fundamentals of grid generation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 286 p

  • Kraak M-J, MacEachren A (1999) Visualization for exploration of spatial data. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 13(4):285–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan C, Russell HAJ, Sharpe DR (2001) Regional three-dimensional stratigraphic modelling of the Oak Ridges Moraine Area, Southern Ontario. Geological Survey of Canada, Current Research 2001-D1, Ottawa, 19 p

  • Loudon TV (2000) Geoscience after IT. Elsevier, Oxford, 142 p

  • MacEachren AM, Kraak M-J (1997) Exploratory cartographic visualization: advancing the agenda. Comput Geosci 23(4):335–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacEachren AM (1998) VISUALIZATION—Cartography for the 21st century. In: Proceedings of the 7th annual conference of Polish spatial information association. Polish Spatial Information Association, May 19–21, Warsaw, pp 287–296

  • MacEachren AM, Kraak M-J (2001) Research challenges in geovisualization. Cartogr Geogr Inf Syst 28(1):3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire DJ, Goodchild MF, Rhind D (1991) Geographical information systems: principles and applications (2 vol set). Longman Scientific and Technical Press, London, 1096 p

  • Nasser KH, Bolivar S, Canepa J, Dorries A (2003) New paradigms for geoscience information management. In: Rosenbaum MS, Turner AK (eds) New paradigms in subsurface prediction. Lecture notes in the earth sciences, number 99, chapter 4. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 41–58

  • Netherlands Institute of Applied Geoscience TNO—National Geological Survey (2000) Geo-information and knowledge management. Internet White Paper 2.07, 4 p. http://www.nitg.tno.nl/ned/projects_new/pdf_s/2_07eng.pdf

  • Pantea MP, Cole JC (2004) Three-dimensional geologic framework modelling of faulted hydrostratigraphic units within the Edwards aquifer, Northern Bexar County, Texas, Version 1.0. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5226, CDROM Release

  • Raper JF (1989) The 3D geoscientific mapping and modelling system: a conceptual design. In: Raper JF (ed) Three-dimensional applications in geographic information systems. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 11–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Raper JF (1991) Key 3D modelling concepts for geoscientific analysis. In: Turner AK (ed) Three-dimensional modelling with geoscientific information systems. NATO ASI Series C: mathematical and physical sciences, vol 354. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 215–232

  • Rhind DW (1971) The production of a multi-colour geological map by automated means. Nachr Aus den Karten Vermessungeswesen Heft 52:47–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhind DW (1981) Geographical information systems in Britain. In: Wrigley N, Bennett RJ (eds) Quantitative geography. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp 17–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritsema IL, Riepen M, Ridder J, Paige SL (1988) Global system definition for version 0.x of the geoscientific information system. SWS Document GSIS 1.1, TNO Institute of Applied Geoscience, Delft

  • Rosenbaum MS, Turner AK (eds) (2003) New paradigms in subsurface prediction. Lecture notes in the earth sciences, Number 99. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 397

  • Russell HAJ, Brennard TA, Logan C, Sharpe DR (1998) Standardization and assessment of geological descriptions from water well records: Greater Toronto and Oak Ridges Moraine Areas, Southern Ontario. Geological Survey of Canada, Current Research 1998-E, Ottawa, pp 89–102

  • Sharpe DR, Hinton MJ, Russell HAJ, Desbarats AJ (2002) The need for basin analysis in regional hydrogeological studies: Oak Ridges Moraine Area, Southern Ontario. Geosci Can 29(1):3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith DR, Paradis AR (1989) Three-dimensional GIS for the earth sciences. In: Raper JF (ed) Three-dimensional applications in geographic information systems. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 149–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Soller DR, Price SD, Kempton JP, Berg RC (1999) Three-dimensional geologic maps of Quaternary sediments in East-Central Illinois. U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Investigations Series Map I-2669, scale 1:250,000

  • Soller DR, Price SD, Berg RC, Kempton JP (1998) A method for three-dimensional mapping. In: Soller DR (ed) Digital mapping techniques ‘98—workshop proceedings. U.S. Geological Survey Open-file Report 98-487, p 79-84

  • Turner AK (1989) The role of three-dimensional geographic information systems in subsurface characterization for hydrogeological applications. In: Raper JF (ed) Three-dimensional applications in geographic information systems. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 115–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner AK (ed) (1991) Three-dimensional modelling with geoscientific information systems. NATO ASI Series C: mathematical and physical sciences, vol 354. Kluwer, Dordrecht, p 443

  • Turner AK (2000) Geoscientific modelling: past, present and future. In: Coburn TC, Yarus JM (eds) Geographic information systems in petroleum exploration and development. AAPG computer applications in geology, vol 4. American Association Petroleum Geologists, pp 27–36

  • Turner AK (2003a) Definition of the modelling technologies. In: Rosenbaum MS, Turner AK (eds) New paradigms in subsurface prediction. Lecture notes in the earth sciences, number 99, chapter 3. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 27–40

  • Turner AK (2003b) Putting the user first: implications for subsurface characterisation. In: Rosenbaum MS, Turner AK (eds) New paradigms in subsurface prediction. Lecture notes in the earth sciences, number 99, chapter 5. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 61–68

  • Turner AK, Rosenbaum MS (2003) The global geoscientific knowledge network: overcoming the impediments to subsurface characterisation. In: Rosenbaum MS, Turner AK (eds) New paradigms in subsurface prediction. Lecture notes in the earth sciences, number 99, chapter 33. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 379–394

  • Thorleifson LH, Matile GLD, Keller GR, Pyne DM (2003) Construction of a hydrostratigraphic model for southern Manitoba. In: Proceedings of the 4th joint international association of hydrogeologists-Canadian National Chapter/Canadian Geotechnical Society Conference, extended abstracts

  • Vinken R (1986) Digital geoscientific maps: a priority program of the German society for the advancement of scientific research. Math Geol 18:237–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinken R (Compiler) (1988a) Construction and display of geoscientific maps derived from databases. In: Proceedings of the international colloquium, Dinkelsbuhl, Germany, December 2–4, 1986. Bundesanstalt fur Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, Hannover, Geologisches Jahrbuch, Reihe A, Heft 104, p 475

  • Vinken R (1988b) Digital geoscientific maps—a research project of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation). In: Vinken R (Compiler) Construction and display of geoscientific maps derived from databases. Proceedings of international colloquium, Dinkelsbuhl, Germany, December 2–4, 1986. Bundesanstalt fur Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, Hannover, Geologisches Jahrbuch, Reihe A, Heft, vol 104, p 7–20

  • Vinken R (Compiler) (1992a) From geoscientific map series to geo-information systems. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international colloquium, Wurzburg, Germany, September 9–11, 1989. Bundesanstalt fur Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, Hannover, Geologisches Jahrbuch, Reihe A, Heft 122, p 501

  • Vinken R (1992b) From digital map series in the geosciences to a geo-information system. In: Vinken R (Compiler) From geoscientific map series to geo-information systems. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international colloquium, Wurzburg, Germany, September 9–11, 1989. Bundesanstalt fur Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, Hannover, Geologisches Jahrbuch, Reihe A, Heft 122, pp 7–25

  • Van Wees J-D, Versseput R, Allard R, Simmelink E, Pagnier H, Ritesema I, Meijers P (2003) Dissemination and visualisation of earth system models for the Dutch subsurface. In: Rosenbaum MS, Turner AK (eds) New paradigms in subsurface prediction. Lecture notes in the earth sciences, number 99, chapter 20. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 225–234

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Professor of Geological Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, 80401, USA

    A. Keith Turner

Authors
  1. A. Keith Turner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Keith Turner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turner, A.K. Challenges and trends for geological modelling and visualisation. Bull Eng Geol Environ 65, 109–127 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-005-0015-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-005-0015-0

Keywords

Mots clés

Search

Navigation