Abstract
In recent years, debt relief has once again been pushed to the forefront of political and economic interest. The general consensus is that with less debt burden poor countries suffering from debt overhang will be able devote more resources towards investment thereby promoting their own growth and thus benefit their creditors in the long run. An open question is which mechanism is best to relieve debt burden. In this paper, we adopt experimental methods to study the effectiveness and efficiency of debt forgiveness and debt buyback. We find that creditors tend to reduce more debt under Forgiveness than Buyback. Debtors under Forgiveness are not significantly more reciprocal than under Buyback. After controlling for the amount of debt relief, creditors are significantly worse off under Forgiveness whereas debtors are indifferent between the two schemes. From the viewpoint of promoting debt relief, debt forgiveness appears to be a more effective tool to achieve this goal. Nevertheless, if one is to maximize the overall efficiency, debt buyback is superior to debt forgiveness in making best of each relief dollar.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afxentiou P (1993) GNP growth and foreign indebtedness in middle-income developing countries. Int Econ J 7(3): 81–92. doi:10.1080/10168739300080022
Chowdhury K (1994) A structural analysis of external debt and economic growth: some evidence from selected countries in Asia and the Pacific. Appl Econ 26(12): 1121–1131. doi:10.1080/00036849400000110
Cohen D (1993) Low investment and large LDC debt in the 1980s. Am Econ Rev 83(3): 437–449
Cunningham RT (1993) The effects of debt burden on economic growth in heavily indebted nations. J Econ Dev 18(1): 115–126
Deshpande A (1997) The debt overhang and the incentive to invest. J Dev Econ 52: 169–187. doi:10.1016/S0304-3878(96)00435-X
Dooley M (1988) Buybacks and the market valuation of external debt. Int Monetary Fund Staff Pap 35: 215–229. doi:10.2307/3867079
Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Exp Econ 10(2): 171–178. doi:10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4
Froot KA (1989) Buybacks, exit bonds, and the optimality of debt and liquidity relief. Int Econ Rev 30: 49–70. doi:10.2307/2526547
Froot KA, Scharfstein DS, Stein JC (1989) LDC debt: forgiveness, indexation, and investment incentives. J Finance 44: 1335–1350. doi:10.2307/2328645
Helpman E (1989) The simple analytics of debt-equity swaps and debt forgiveness. NBER Working Paper No. W2771
Karagol E (2002) The causality analysis of external debt service and GNP: the case of Turkey. Cent Bank Rev 2(1): 39–64
Krugman P (1988) Financing vs. forgiving a debt overhang. J Dev Econ 29: 253–268. doi:10.1016/0304-3878(88)90044-2
Krugman P (1989) Market-based debt reduction Schemes. In: Frenkel JA, Dooley MP, Wickham P (eds) Analytical issues in debt. International Monetary Fund, Washington DC
O’Connell SA (2000) Debt forgiveness: plainer speaking, please. Unpublished memo
Rockerbie DW (1994) Did debt crisis cause the investment crisis? Further evidence. Appl Econ 26(7): 731–738. doi:10.1080/00036849400000044
Sachs J (1989) The debt overhang of developing countries. In: Calvo GA, Findlay R, Kouri P, de Macedo JB (eds) Debt stabilization and development. Basil Blackwell, Oxford
Savvides A (1992) Investment slowdown in developing countries during the 1980s: debt overhang or foreign capital inflows. Kyklos 3: 363–378. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6435.1992.tb02121.x
Warner AM (1992) Did the debt crisis cause the investment crisis. Q J Econ 107(4): 1161–1186. doi:10.2307/2118384
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lei, V., Tucker, S. & Vesely, F. Forgive or buy back: an experimental study of debt relief. Rev Econ Design 14, 291–309 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-009-0083-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-009-0083-x