Skip to main content
Log in

Seniority bias in a tournament

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Review of Economic Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents a model where the probability of promotion tends to increase with seniority (overall labor market experience) without relying on the accumulation of general human capital. To this end, we consider the optimal design of a tournament (a relative compensation scheme) between two agents with different time horizon, the young and the old, in an overlapping generations framework. When the principal can only imperfectly monitor each agent’s effort level, the difference in time horizon leads to the ex post difference in the marginal value of effort between the two agents. In this case, the optimal tournament necessarily involves a bias towards the old agent. Within this framework, we also examine the relationship between: (1) the monitoring accuracy and the optimal bias; and (2) the value of outside options and the optimal bias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham KG, Farber HS (1987) Job duration, seniority, and earnings. Am Econ Rev 77:278–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Altonji JG, Shakotko RA (1987) Do wages rise with job seniority?. Rev Econ Stud 54:437–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker G, Jensen MC, Murphy KJ (1988) Compensation and incentives: practice vs. theory. J Financ 43:593–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth E (1997) Firm-specific seniority and wages. J Labor Econ 15:495–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glazer A, Hassin R (1988) Optimal contests. Econ. Inquiry 26:133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazear EP (1979) Why is there mandatory retirement?. J Polit Econ 87:1261–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazear EP, Rosen S (1981) Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J Polit Econ 89:841–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malcomson JM (1984) Work incentives, hierarchy, and internal labor markets. J Polit Econ 92:486–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parent D (2000) Industry-specific caputal and the wage profile: evidence from the national longitudinal survey of youth and the panel study of income dynamics. J Labor Econ 18:306–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast C (1992) Career development and specific human capital collection. J Jpn Int Econ 6:207–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh N, Wittman D (2001) Contests where there is a variation in the marginal productivity of effort. Econ Theory 18:711–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topel R (1991) Specific capital, mobility, and wages: wages rise with job seniority. J Polit Econ 99:145–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junichiro Ishida.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ishida, J. Seniority bias in a tournament. Rev. Econ. Design 10, 143–164 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-006-0008-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-006-0008-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation