Skip to main content
Log in

The efficiency of visually guided movement in real and virtual space

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virtual Reality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is an increasing interest in the use of low-cost virtual reality (VR) for training and simulation. As effective training for many tasks requires efficient sensory–motor coordination, we investigated the efficiency of visually guided movement in VR using a standardised Fitts’ tapping task. Throughput is a measure of movement efficiency and was significantly lower in VR than for a touchscreen. This difference was particularly marked for targets distributed in depth and is likely to reflect known limitations of VR visual display. The addition of haptic cues increased throughput slightly. The lower throughput in VR was due to both a decrease in the precision of pointing and an increase in movement time. Movement distances were equivalent for the touchscreen and VR, but on average slightly smaller than specified by the task. VR presentation also resulted in more numerous double touches on targets. There was evidence of a small and rapid learning effect for VR, but this was limited to the first block of 9 trials (252 movements). For tasks requiring skilled sensory–motor coordination, current low-cost VR may not provide the same transfer of training as the real world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19896619.v1.

Notes

  1. For an odd N targets and circle diameter ϕ, the distance between successive targets is given by \(\phi \mathrm{cos}\left(\frac{\uppi }{2\mathrm{N}}\right)\).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by ARC Discovery project grant DP190100533 (to GW) and ARC Linkage Grant LP180100377 (Industry Partner: Boeing) (to GW).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ken McAnally.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interests.

Ethical approval

The experiment was approved by the University of Queensland Health and Behavioural Sciences Low and Negligible Risk Ethics Sub-Committee. Participants gave informed consent to participate and for their anonymous results to be published.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McAnally, K., Wallwork, K. & Wallis, G. The efficiency of visually guided movement in real and virtual space. Virtual Reality 27, 1187–1197 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00724-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00724-5

Keywords

Navigation