Skip to main content
Log in

Interaction design studio learning in virtual worlds

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Virtual Reality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper suggests that virtual worlds (VWs) have many unique advantages for supporting interaction design studio activities, provided that they are designed to include appropriate workplaces and interactive tools to foster collaboration and creativity. We present an approach for employing VWs that proposes the use of prospective tools and workplaces throughout the following key activities of interaction design studio courses: design brief, design thinking, design practice (conceptual and detailed), the desk crit, design review and user evaluation. Then, we describe a blended interaction design studio course on the basis of this approach, which ran through a whole semester. We found that the VW design studio is an engaging and constructive experience for students: In the VW environment, students and tutors held many online meetings, and students constructed several models about their design project, developed a digital prototype and conducted a remote usability evaluation. In addition, the persistence of the environment and the developed VW tools helped students and tutors to achieve careful feedback and reflection during the design project lifetime. Nevertheless, a number of challenges remain for wider implementation: the refinement of the instructional design approach, the usability of VW tools, further integration of VWs to professional design tools and the conduction of other full-scale VW design studio courses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bardzell J, Bardzell S, Briggs C, Makice K, Ryan W, Weldon M (2006) Machinima prototyping: an approach to evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on human-computer interaction (NordiCHI ‘06), pp 433–436

  • Benford S, Greenhalgh C, Rodden T, Pycock J (2001) Collaborative virtual environments. Commun ACM 44(7):79–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer H, Hortzblatt K (1997) Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems (1st ed) Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco

  • Blevis E (2010) Design challenge based learning (DCBL) and sustainable pedagogical practice. ACM Interact 17(3):64–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman DA, Wineman J, Hodges LF, Allison D (1998) Designing animal habitats within an immersive VE. Comput Graph Appl 18(5):9–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadfoot O, Bennett R (2003) Design studios online?: comparing traditional face-to-face design studio education with modern internet-based design studios. Apple University Consortium. http://auc.uow.edu.au/conf/conf03/papers/AUC_DV2003_Broadfoot.pdf. Accessed 16 Feb 2012

  • Brown DM (2007) Communicating design: developing web site documentation for design and planning. New Riders, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruno F, Muzzupappa M (2010) Product interface design: a participatory approach based on virtual reality. Int J Human-Comput Stud 68:254–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase S (2008) Virtual worlds as collaborative environments for design and manufacturing: from idea to product. In: Proceedings of 5th INTUITION international conference

  • Cooper A, Reimann R, Cronin D (2007) About Face 3: the essentials of interaction design. Wiley, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross N (1990) The nature and nurture of design ability. Des Stud 11(3):127–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross N (2000) Engineering design methods: strategies for product design, 3rd Ed, Wiley

  • Cross N, Christiaans H, Dorst K (eds) (1996) Analysing design activity. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalgarno B, Lee MJW (2010) What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? British J Educ Technol 41(1):10–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Lucia A, Francese R, Passero I, Tortora G (2009) Development and evaluation of a virtual campus on second life: the case of SecondDMI. Comput Educ 52(1):220–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dede C (1995) The evolution of constructivist learning environments: immersion in distributed, virtual worlds. Educ Technol 35(5):46–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Dix A, Finlay JE, Abowd GD, Beale R (2003) Human-computer interaction, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehsani E, Chase SC (2009) Using virtual worlds as collaborative environments for innovation and design: lessons learned and observations from case studies in architectural projects. In: Proceedings of the 27th conference on education in computer aided architectural design in Europe, pp 523–531

  • Frederickson MP, Anderton F (1990) Design juries: a study on lines of communication. J Archit Educ 43:22–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett JJ (2003) The elements of user experience. New Riders

  • Girvan C, Savage T (2010) Identifying an appropriate pedagogy for virtual worlds: a communal constructivism case study. Comput Educ 55(1):342–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt G, Hochman H, Dafni I (2010) The design studio “crit”: teacher–student communication. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 24(3):285–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg S (2009) Embedding a design studio course in a conventional computer science program. In: Proceedings of creativity and HCI: experience to design in education; Boston: Springer, pp 23–41

  • Gul LF, Wang X, Bulbul TT, Cagdas G, Tong H (2009) Global teamwork: a study of design learning in collaborative virtual environments. In: Proceedings of undisciplined! design research society conference

  • Hew KF, Cheung WS (2010) Use of three-dimensional (3-D) immersive virtual worlds in K-12 and higher education settings: a review of the research. Br J Educ Technol 41(1):33–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo JC, Hartson R, Hix, D (1998) Remote usability evaluation: can users report their own critical incidents? In: Proceedings of the conference on human factors on computing systems (CHI’98) ACM Press, New York pp 253–254

  • Hmelo-Silver CE (2004) Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn? Educ Psychol Rev 16(3):235–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hundhausen C, Fairbrother D, Petre M (2010) The “Prototype walkthrough”: a studio-based learning activity for the next generation of HCI education. In: Proceedings of next generation of HCI and education: CHI 2010 Workshop on UI Technologies and Educational Pedagogy

  • Kim HM, Lyons K, Cunningham MA (2008) Towards a framework for evaluating immersive business models: evaluating service innovations in second life. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, pp 110

  • Kohler T, Matzler K, Füller J (2009) Avatar-based innovation: using virtual worlds for real-world innovation. Technovation 29:395–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutsabasis P, Vosinakis S, Malisova K, Paparounas N (2012) On the value of virtual worlds for collaborative design. Des Stud 33(4):357–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowgren J, Stolterman E (2004) Thoughtful interaction design: a design perspective on information technology, MIT Press

  • Maher ML, Simoff SJ (1999) Variations on the virtual design studio. In: Proceedings of fourth international workshop on CSCW in design, Universite de Technologie de Compiegne, pp 159–165

  • Prendinger H, Brandherm B, Ullrich S (2009) A simulation framework for sensor-based systems in second life. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ 18(6):468–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragusa JM, Bochenek GM (2001) Collaborative virtual design environments: introduction. Commun ACM 44(12):40–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosson MB, Carroll J (2001) Usability engineering: scenario-based development of human computer interaction, 1st edn. Morgan Kaufmann

  • Ryd N (2004) The design brief as carrier of client information during the construction process. Des Stud 25(3):231–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saffer D (2007) Designing for interaction. New Riders, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön D (1987) Educating the reflective practitioner. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer DW (2003) Portrait of the Oxford design studio: An ethnography of design pedagogy (WCER Working Paper No. 2003-11). Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison

  • Snyder C (2003) Paper prototyping. Morgan Kauffman

  • Sun Q, Gramoll K (2004) Internet-based simulation and virtual world for engineering education. Eng Des Graph J 68(1):13–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullis T, Albert B (2008) Measuring the user experience, Elsevier

  • Vanderdonckt J, Chieu CK, Bouillon L, Trevisan D (2004) Model-based design, generation, and evaluation of virtual user interfaces. In: Proceedings of the ninth international conference on 3D Web technology (Web3D ‘04). ACM, New York, pp 51–60

  • Wang L, Shen W, Xie H, Neelamkavil J, Pardasani A (2002) Collaborative conceptual design—state of the art and future trends. Comput-Aided Des 34:981–996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood DF (2003) ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: problem based learning. British Med J 326(7384):328–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Spyros Vosinakis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vosinakis, S., Koutsabasis, P. Interaction design studio learning in virtual worlds. Virtual Reality 17, 59–75 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-013-0221-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-013-0221-1

Keywords

Navigation