Advertisement

Virtual Reality

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 55–65 | Cite as

Brain activity and presence: a preliminary study in different immersive conditions using transcranial Doppler monitoring

  • Beatriz ReyEmail author
  • Mariano Alcañiz
  • José Tembl
  • Vera Parkhutik
Original Article

Abstract

Transcranial Doppler (TCD) sonography is a brain activity measurement technique that monitors the hemodynamic characteristics of the major cerebral arteries in normal and pathological conditions. As it is not invasive, it can be easily used in combination with virtual environments (VE). In the present study, TCD has been used to analyze brain activity variations in different presence conditions during the exposure to a VE. Forty-two subjects have taken part in the experience grouped in two different visualization conditions: a CAVE-like and a single screen projection configuration. In each session, two different navigation conditions were used: a free navigation (controlled by the subject) and an automatic navigation (controlled by the system). Results show that these immersion and navigation modifications in the VE generate changes in brain activity that can be detected using TCD techniques. Several factors, one of them being presence, could be having an influence on this behavior.

Keywords

Presence Brain activity Transcranial Doppler Virtual reality Immersion Navigation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Jose Lores, from Almevan S. L., for his support with the Transcranial Doppler equipment used in this work.

References

  1. Aaslid R, Markwalder TM, Nornes H (1982) Noninvasive transcranial Doppler ultrasound recording of flow velocity in basal cerebral arteries. J Neurosurg 57:769–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcañiz M, Rey B, Tembl J, Parkhutik V (2009) A neuroscience approach to virtual reality experience using transcranial Doppler monitoring. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 18:97–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antley A, Slater M (2009). The effect of lower spine muscle activation of walking on a narrow beam in virtual reality. 2nd RAVE (Real Actions, Virtual Environments) workshop, March 4, 2009, Barcelona, SpainGoogle Scholar
  4. Axelsson A, Abelin A, Heldal I et al. (2000) Cubes in the cube: a comparison of collaboration in virtual and real environments. In: 3rd international workshop on presence, 27–28 March, 2000. NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  5. Azevedo E, Rosengarten B, Santos R et al (2007) Interplay of cerebral autoregulation and neurovascular coupling evaluated by functional TCD in different orthostatic conditions. J Neurol 254:236–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Backer M, Hammes MG, Valet M et al (2002) Different modes of manual acupuncture stimulation differentially modulate cerebral blood flow velocity, arterial blood pressure and heart rate in human subjects. Neurosci Lett 333:203–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baños RM, Botella C, García-Palacios A et al (1992) Presence and reality judgment in virtual environments: a unitary construct? Cyberpsychol Behav 3:327–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baños R, Botella C, Guerrero B et al (2005) The third pole of the sense of presence: comparing virtual and imagery spaces. PsychNol J 3:90–100Google Scholar
  9. Basdogan C, Ho C, Srinivasan MA et al (2000) An experimental study on the role of touch in shared virtual environments. ACM Transact Comput Hum Interact 7:443–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baumgartner T, Valko L, Esslen M et al (2006) Neural correlates of spatial presence in an arousing and noninteractive virtual reality: an EEG and psychophysiology study. Cyberpsychol Behav 9:30–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Biocca F, Delaney B (1995) Immersive virtual reality technology. In: Biocca F, Levy MR (eds) Communication in the age of virtual reality. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 57–124Google Scholar
  12. Bouchard S, St-Jacques J, Robillard G et al (2008) Anxiety increases the feeling of presence in virtual reality. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 17:376–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bulla-Hellwig M, Vollmer J, Götzen A et al (1996) Hemispheric asymmetry of arterial blood flow velocity changes during verbal and visuospatial tasks. Neuropsychologia 34:987–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Callan A, Ando H (2007) Neural correlates of imagery induced by the ambient sound. In: 10th international workshop on presence, Oct 25–27, 2007. Barcelona, SpainGoogle Scholar
  15. Cupini LM, Matteis M, Troisi E et al (1996) Bilateral simultaneous transcranial Doppler monitoring of flow velocity changes during visuospatial and verbal working memory tasks. Brain 119:1249–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Daffertshofer M (2001) Functional Doppler testing. In: Hennerici M, Meairs S (eds) Cerebrovascular ultrasound theory practice and future developments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 341–359Google Scholar
  17. Deppe M, Knecht S, Henningsen H et al (1997) Average: a Windows program for automated analysis of event related cerebral blood flow. J Neurosci Methods 75:147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dillon C, Keogh E, Freeman J et al (2000) Aroused and immersed: the psychophysiology of presence. In: 3rd international workshop on presence, March 27–28, 2000. NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  19. Freeman J, Avons SE, Meddis R et al (2000) Using behavioural realism to estimate presence: a study of the utility of postural responses to motion stimuli. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 9:149–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Friedman D, Brogni A, Guger C et al (2006) Sharing and analyzing data from presence experiments. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 15:599–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harders AG, Laborde G, Droste DW et al (1989) Brain activity and blood flow velocity changes: a transcranial Doppler study. Int J Neurosci 47:91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hendrix C, Barfield W (1996) Presence within virtual environments as a function of visual display parameters. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 4:274–289Google Scholar
  23. Hoffman HG, Richards T, Coda B et al (2003) The illusion of presence in immersive virtual reality during an fMRI brain scan. Cyberpsychol Behav 6:127–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holden MK, Todorov E (2002) Use of virtual environments in motor learning and rehabilitation. In: Stanney KM (ed) Handbook of virtual environments: design implementation and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 999–1026Google Scholar
  25. Huang M, Alessi N (1999) Presence as an emotional experience. In: Estwood JD, Hoffman HM, Robb RA, Stredney D (eds) Medicine meets virtual reality: the convergence of physical and informational technologies options for a new era in healthcare. IOS Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  26. Iadecola C (1993) Regulation of the cerebral microcirculation during neural activity: is nitric oxide the missing link? Trends Neurosci 16:206–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. IJsselsteijn WA, de Ridder H (1998) Measuring temporal variations in presence. Presence in shared virtual environments workshop, Jun 10–11, 1998. London, UKGoogle Scholar
  28. Insko BE (2003) Measuring presence: subjective, behavioral and physiological methods. In: Riva G, Davide F, IJsselsteijn WA (eds) Being there: concepts, effects and measurement of user presence in synthetic environments. IOS Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  29. Kelley RE, Chang JY, Scheinman NJ et al (1992) Transcranial Doppler assessment of cerebral flow velocity during cognitive tasks. Stroke 23:9–14Google Scholar
  30. Kim T, Biocca F (1997) Telepresence via television: Two dimensions of telepresence may have different connections to memory and persuasion. J Comput Mediat Commun 3(2). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue2/kim.html
  31. Knecht S, Henningsen H, Deppe M et al (1996) Successive activation of both cerebral hemispheres during cued word generation. Neuroreport 7:820–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Knecht S, Dräger B, Deppe M et al (2000) Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans. Brain 123:2512–2518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Laarni J, Ravaja N, Saari T (2003) Using eye tracking and psychophysiological methods to study spatial presence. In: 6th international workshop on presence, October 6–8, 2003. Aalborg, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  34. Lessiter J, Freeman J, Keogh E et al (2001) A cross-media presence questionnaire: the ITC-sense of presence inventory. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 10:282–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lombard M, Ditton T (2000) Measuring presence: a literature-based approach to the development of a standardized paper-and-pencil instrument. 3rd international workshop on presence, March 27–28, 2000. NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  36. Matteis M, Caltagirone C, Troisi E et al (2001) Changes in cerebral blood flow induced by passive and active elbow and hand movements. J Neurol 248:104–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Matteis M, Federico F, Troisi E et al (2006) Cerebral blood flow velocity changes during meaningful and meaningless gestures—a functional transcranial Doppler study. Eur J Neurol 13:24–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCartney JP, Thomas-Lukes KM, Gomez CR (1997) Handbook of transcranial Doppler. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Meehan M, Insko B, Whitton M et al (2001) Physiological measures of presence in virtual environments. In: 4th international workshop on presence, May 21–23, 2001. Philadelphia, USAGoogle Scholar
  40. Nichols S, Haldane C, Wilson JR (2000) Measurement of presence and its consequences in virtual environments. Int J Hum Comput Stud 52:471–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Orlandi G, Murri L (1996) TCD assessment of cerebral blood flow velocity at rest and during voluntary movements in young and elderly healthy subjects. Int J Neurosci 84:45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Price M, Anderson P (2006) The role of presence in virtual reality exposure therapy. J Anxiety Disord 21:742–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pugnetti L, Mendozzi L, Barberi E et al (1996) Nervous system correlates of virtual reality experience. In: Sharkey P (ed) Proceedings of the first European conference on disability, virtual reality and associated technology, pp 239–246Google Scholar
  44. Ravaja N (2002) Presence-related influences of a small talking facial image on psychophysiological measures of emotion and attention. In: 5th international workshop on presence. October 9–11, 2002. Porto, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  45. Rihs F, Gutbrod K, Steiger HJ et al (1995) Determination of cognitive hemispheric dominance by “stereo” transcranial Doppler sonography. Stroke 26:70–73Google Scholar
  46. Ringelstein EB, Kahlscheuer B, Niggemeyer E et al (1990) Transcranial Doppler sonography: anatomical landmarks and normal velocity values. Ultrasound Med Biol 16:745–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Risberg J (1986) Regional cerebral blood flow in neuropsychology. Neuropsychologia 24:135–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Riva G, Mantovani F, Capideville CS et al (2007) Affective interactions using virtual reality: the link between presence and emotions. Cyberpsychol Behav 10:45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sadowski W, Stanney K (2002) Presence in virtual environments. In: Stanney K (ed) Handbook of virtual environments design implementation, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 791–807Google Scholar
  50. Sanchez-Vives MV, Slater M (2005) From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:332–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schlögl A, Slater M, Pfurtscheller G (2002) Presence research and EEG. In: 5th international workshop on presence. October 9–11, 2002. Porto, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  52. Schmidt P, Kings T, Willmes K et al (1999) Determination of cognitive hemispheric lateralization by “functional” transcranial Doppler cross-validated by functional MRI. Stroke 30:939–945Google Scholar
  53. Schnittger C, Johannes S, Arnavaz A et al (1997) Blood flow velocity changes in the middle cerebral artery induced by processing of hierarchical visual stimuli. Neuropsychologia 35:1181–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schubert TW, Friedmann F, Regenbrecht HT (1999) Decomposing the sense of presence: factor analytic insights. In: 2nd international workshop on presence, April 6–7, 1999. University of Essex, UKGoogle Scholar
  55. Schuemie MJ, van der Straaten P, Krijn M et al (2001) Research on presence in virtual reality: a survey. Cyberpsychol Behav 4:183–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sheridan TB (1992) Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 1:120–126Google Scholar
  57. Silvestrini M, Cupini LM, Matteis M et al (1994) Bilateral simultaneous assessment of cerebral flow velocity during mental activity. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 14:643–648Google Scholar
  58. Slater M, Steed A, McCarthy J et al (1998) The influence of body movement on subjective presence in virtual environments. Hum Factors 40:469–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Slater M, Steed A (2000) A virtual presence counter. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 9:413–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Slater M, Wilbur S (1997) A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 6:603–616Google Scholar
  61. Slater M, Usoh M, Chrysanthou Y (1995) The influence of dynamic shadows on presence in immersive virtual environments. Virtual Environ 95:8–21Google Scholar
  62. Slater M, Linakis V, Usoh M (1996) Immersion, presence and performance in virtual environments: an experiment with tri-dimensional chess. In: Green M et al (eds) ACM virtual reality software and technology. ACM, New York, pp 163–172Google Scholar
  63. Slater M, Guger C, Edlinger G et al (2006) Analysis of physiological responses to a social situation in an immersive virtual environment. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 15:553–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stoll M, Hamann GF, Mangold R et al (1999) Emotionally evoked changes in cerebral hemodynamics measured by transcranial Doppler sonography. J Neurol 246:127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stone RJ (2002) Applications of virtual environments: an overview. In: Stanney K (ed) Handbook of virtual environments design implementation, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 827–857Google Scholar
  66. Strickland D, Chartier D (1997) EEG measurements in a virtual reality headset. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 6:581–589Google Scholar
  67. Stroobant N, Vingerhoets G (2000) Transcranial doppler ultrasonography monitoring of cerebral hemodynamics during performance of cognitive tasks: a review. Neuropsychol Rev 10:213–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tatu L, Moulin T, Bogousslavsky J et al (1998) Arterial territories of the human brain cerebral hemispheres. Neurology 50:1699–1708Google Scholar
  69. Troisi E, Silvestrini M, Matteis M et al (1999) Emotion-related cerebral asymmetry: hemodynamics measured by functional ultrasound. J Neurol 246:1172–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Usoh M, Catena E, Arman S et al (2000) Using presence questionnaires in reality. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 9:497–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vingerhoets G, Stroobant N (1999) Lateralization of cerebral blood flow velocity changes during cognitive tasks a simultaneous bilateral transcranial Doppler study. Stroke 30:2152–2158Google Scholar
  72. Vingerhoets G, Berckmoes C, Stroobant N (2003) Cerebral hemodynamics during discrimination of prosodic and semantic emotion in speech studied by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Neuropsychology 17:93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Welch RB, Blackmon TT, Liu A et al (1996) The effects of pictorial realism, delay of visual feedback, and observer interactivity on the subjective sense of presence. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 5:263–273Google Scholar
  74. Witmer BG, Singer MJ (1998) Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 7:225–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Youngblut C, Perrin BM (2002) Investigating the relationship between presence and performance in virtual environments. IMAGE 2002 conference, ArizonaGoogle Scholar
  76. Zahorik P, Jenison RL (1998) Presence as being-in-the-world. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 7:78–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beatriz Rey
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mariano Alcañiz
    • 1
  • José Tembl
    • 2
  • Vera Parkhutik
    • 2
  1. 1.Instituto en Bioingeniería y Tecnología Orientada al Ser HumanoUniversidad Politécnica de ValenciaValenciaSpain
  2. 2.Neurology ServiceHospital Universitari La FeValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations