Skip to main content

Design and implementation of medical training simulators

Abstract

This paper discusses the design issues and implementation details of building a medical training simulator. Example projects that have been undertaken by the Visualization and Medical Graphics group at Bangor University and our collaborators are used to illustrate the points made. A detailed case study is then presented of a virtual environment designed to train the Seldinger Technique, a common procedure in interventional radiology. The paper will introduce a medical practitioner to the technology behind a medical virtual environment. It will also provide an engineer with an overview of many of the issues that need to be considered when undertaking to build such an application. The paper ends with the author’s views on future developments in this exciting domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  • Ackerman MJ (1998) The visible human project. Proc IEEE 86(3):504–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allard J, Cotin S, Faure F, Bensoussan PJ, Poyer F, Duriez C, Delingette H, Grisoni L (2007) SOFA—an open source framework for medical simulation. In: Medicine meets virtual reality 15. Studies in health technology and informatics, vol 125. IOS Press, pp 13–18

  • Azar T, Hayward V (2008) Estimation of the fracture toughness of soft tissue from needle insertion. Springer lecture notes in computer science, vol 5104, pp 166–175. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-70521-5

  • Buckley B, John NW (2008) Efficient soft tissue modelling using charged particle control points, Eurographics 2008 short paper, Crete, pp 191–194. ISSN 1017-4656

  • Cavusoglu MC, Goktekin TG, Tendick F, Sastry SS (2004) GiPSi: an open source/open architecture software development framework for surgical simulation. In: Medicine meets virtual reality 12. Studies in health technology and informatics, vol 98. IOS Press, pp 46–48

  • Freudenthal A, Samset E, Gersak B, Declerck J, Schmalsieg D, Casciaro S, Rident O, Vander Sloten J (2005) Augmented reality in surgery ARIS*ER, research training network for minimally invasive therapy technologies. Endosc Rev 10(23):5–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindaraju NK, Lin MC, Manocha D (2006) Efficient collision culling among deformable objects using graphics processors. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 15(1):62–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson J, Lindfors C, Mattsson L, Kjellberg T. (2005) Large-format 3D interaction table In: Woods AJ, Bolas MT, Merritt JO, McDowall IE (eds) Stereoscopic display and virtual reality systems XII: SPIE 5664, pp 589–595

  • Healey AE, Evans JC, Murphy MG, Powell S et al (2005) In vivo force during arterial interventional radiology needle puncture procedures. In: Medicine meets virtual reality 13. Studies in health technology and informatics, vol 111. IOS Press, pp 178–184

  • Hughes CJ, John NW (2006) A flexible infrastructure for delivering augmented reality enabled transcranial magnetic stimulation. In: Proceedings of medicine meets virtual reality 14, 24–27 January 2006, Long Beach, CA, pp 219–114

  • Jackson A, John NW, Thacker NA, Ramsden RT et al (2002) Developing a virtual reality environment in petrous bone surgery. Otol Neurotol 23:111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John NW (2002) Using stereoscopy for medical VR, In: Medicine meets virtual reality 02/10. Studies in health technology and informatics, IOS Press, ISSN: 0926-9630, ISBN 1-58603-203-8, pp 214–220

  • John NW (2007) The impact of Web3D technologies on medical education and training. Comput Educ 49(1):19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John NW, Riding M, Phillips NI, Mackay S, Steineke L, Fontaine B et al (2001) Web-based surgical educational tools. Medicine meets virtual reality 9. Studies in health technology and informatics. IOS Press, pp 212–217. ISBN 1-58603-143-0

  • John NW, McCloy RF, Herrman S (2004) Interrogation of patient data delivered to the operating theatre during hepato-pancreatic surgery using high performance computing. Comput Aided Surg 9(6):235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John NW, Aratow M, Couch J, Evestedt D, Hudson AD, Polys N et al (2008) MedX3D: standards enabled desktop medical 3D, Stud Health Technol Inform. In: Proceedings of medicine meets virtual reality 2008, vol 132. pp 189–194. ISBN 978-1-58603-822-9

  • Johnson SJ, Healey AE, Evans JC, Murphy MG, Crawshaw M, Gould DA (2005) Physical and cognitive task analysis in interventional radiology. J Clin Radiol 61(1):97–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu A, Tendick F, Cleary K, Kaufmann C (2003) A survey of surgical simulation: applications, technology, and education. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 12(6):599–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery K, Bruyns C, Brown J, Sorkin S, Mazzella F, Thonier G, Tellier A, Lerman B, Menon A (2002) Spring: a general framework for collaborative, real-time surgical simulation. In: Medicine meets virtual reality 12. Studies in health technology and informatics, vol 85. IOS Press, pp 296–303

  • Moorthy K, Mansoori M, Bello F, Hance J, Undre S, Munz Y et al (2004) Evaluation of the benefit of VR simulation in a multi-media web-based educational tool. In: Medicine meets virtual reality 12. Studies in health technology and informatics. IOS Press, pp 247–252

  • National Capital Area Medical Simulator Center Surgical Simulation Laboratory (2008) Web Site, http://simcen.org/surgery/index.html Last visited August 2008

  • Okamura AM, Simone C, O’Leary MD (2004) Force modeling for needle insertion into soft tissue. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51(10):1707–1716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens JD, Luebke D, Govindaraju N, Harris M et al (2007) A survey of general-purpose computation on graphics hardware. Comput Graph Forum 26(1):80–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poston T, Serra L (1996) Dextrous virtual work. Commun ACM 39(5):37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruspini DC, Kolarov K, Khatib O (1997) The haptic display of complex graphical environments. In: Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1997, pp 345–352

  • Schatz MC, Trapnell C, Delcher AL, Varshney A (2007) High-throughput sequence alignment using graphics processing units. BMC Bioinformatics 8:474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder W, Martin K, Lorensen B (2006) The visualization toolkit an object-oriented approach to 3D graphics, 4th edn. ISBN: 1-930934-19-X

  • Seldinger SI (1953) Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography; a new technique. Acta Radiologica 39(5):368–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahabi C, Ortega A, Kolahdouzan MR (2002) A comparison of different haptic compression techniques. IEEE international conference on multimedia and expo, vol 1, pp 657–660

  • Soferman Z, Blythe D, John NW (1998) Advanced graphics behind medical virtual reality: evolution of algorithms, hardware, and software interfaces. Proc IEEE 86(3):531–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas RG, John NW, Lim IS (2006) A mixed reality anatomy teaching tool. In: Proceedings of theory and practice of computer graphics 2006, Teesside, 165–170

  • Vidal, F.P., John, N.W. (2007) Interactive Physically-Based X-Ray Simulation: CPU or GPU? In: Proceedings of medicine meets virtual reality, Stud Health Technol Inform vol 125, pp 479–481

  • Vidal FP, Bello F, Brodlie K, John NW, Gould DA, Phillips R, Avis N (2006) Principles and applications of computer graphics in medicine. Comput Graph Forum 25(1):113–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal FP, John NW, Healey AE, Gould DA (2008a) Simulation of ultrasound guided needle puncture using patient specific data with 3D textures and volume haptics. Comput Animat Virtual Worlds 19(2):111–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal FP, Healy AE, John NW, Gould DA (2008) Force penetration of chiba needles for haptic rendering in ultrasound guided needle puncture training simulator. In: Workshop on needle steering: recent results and future opportunities, MICCAI 2008, New York

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work presented in this paper is the result of contributions from many talented colleagues and research students, and multi-disciplinary collaborators. It has been a great pleasure to work with them all. Visualization and Medical Graphics Group at Bangor: Franck P Vidal, Chris J Hughes, Ik Soo Lim, Serban Pop, Rhys Thomas, Oli Buckley, Llyr ap Cynydd and Tim Coles. CRaIVE network: Derek A Gould, Sheena J Johnson, Helen Woolnough, Carrie Hunt, Fernando Bello, Vincent Luboz, Pierre-Frederic Villard, Andrew E Healey, Jonathan Evans, Amrita Sinha, Roger Phillips, James W Ward, Yan Zhang, Sandhya Pisharody. Martin Crawshaw, Ken W Brodlie, Andrew Bulpit, Richard Holbrey, Yi Song, Nicholas Chalmers, Thien How and David Kessel. Darwin Caldwell, Italian Institute of Technology. Web3D Consortium Medical Working Group: M. Aratow, J. Couch, D. Evestedt, A.D. Hudson, N. Polys, R.F. Puk, A. Ray, K. Victor, Q. Wang work described in this paper has been funded by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, the UK National Institute for Health Research HTD programme, the European Union and the US Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nigel W. John.

Additional information

N. W. John is the 12th recipient of the MMVR Satava Award, 2006.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

John, N.W. Design and implementation of medical training simulators. Virtual Reality 12, 269–279 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-008-0101-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-008-0101-2

Keywords

  • Medical virtual environments
  • Haptics
  • 3D displays
  • Graphics hardware
  • Seldinger technique
  • Augmented reality