Virtual Reality

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 107–113 | Cite as

The incorporation of challenge enhances the learning of chronology from a virtual display

  • Nigel Foreman
  • Liliya Korallo
  • David Newson
  • Natalie Sarantos
Original Article


In earlier studies investigating the learning of historical chronology, virtual fly-throughs were used in which successive historical events were represented by images on virtual screens, placed in temporal-spatial sequence. Undergraduate students benefited more than school-age children from virtual 3D (compared to 2D) training, perhaps because they took on the task as a challenge. In this study a modification of the earlier paradigm was used, in a game-like format, in which successive screens (paintings, representing epochs of art history) had to be memorised and anticipated during training, the participant’s score accumulating on the screen. Compared with PowerPoint and verbal-semantic training conditions, VE training resulted in more rapid learning, better recall of associated semantic information and error-free recall of the picture sequence. Possible applications of this paradigm for teaching were discussed.


Chronology Art history Virtual environment Game format Undergraduates 


  1. Atkinson RC, Shiffrin RM (1971) The control of short-term memory. Sci Am 225:82–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barraclough S, Foreman N (1994) Factors influencing recall of supraspan word lists: caffeine dose and introversion. Pharmacopsychoecologia 7:229–236Google Scholar
  3. Bliss JP, Tidwell PD, Guest MA (1997) The effectiveness of virtual reality for administering spatial navigational training to firefighters. Presence Teleoper Virtual Environ 6:73–86Google Scholar
  4. Broadbent D (1981) Decision and stress. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper H (1994) Historical thinking and cognitive development in the teaching of history. In: Bourdillon H (ed) Teaching history. Routledge, London, pp 101–121Google Scholar
  6. Cooper H (2000) The teaching of history in primary schools: implementing the revised national curriculum, 3rd edn. David Fulton Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Foreman N, Stanton D, Wilson P, Duffy H (2003) Spatial knowledge of a real school environment acquired from virtual or physical models by able-bodied children and children with physical disabilities. J Exp Psychol Appl 9:67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foreman N, Wilson P, Stanton D, Duffy H, Parnell R (2005) Transfer of spatial knowledge to a two-level shopping mall in older people, following virtual exploration. Environ Behav 37:275–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Foreman N, Boyd-Davis S, Moar M, Korallo L, Chappell E (2007). Can virtual environments enhance the learning of historical chronology? Instr Sci (in press)Google Scholar
  10. Friedman WJ (1982) Conventional time concepts and children’s structuring of time. In: Friedman WJ (ed) The developmental psychology of time, Academic Press, New York, pp 171–208Google Scholar
  11. Haydn T (1999) Teaching children about time; back to basics? In: Phillips R, Easdown G (eds) History education: subject knowledge, pedagogy and practice. Standing conference of history teacher educators in the United Kingdom, Lancaster, pp 117–130Google Scholar
  12. Hodkinson A (1995) Historical time and national curriculum. Teach Hist 79:18–20Google Scholar
  13. Hoodless P (1996) Time and timelines in the primary school. The Historical Association, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Kullberg RL (1995) Dynamic timelines: visualizing historical information in three dimensions. MSc. Thesis, MIT Media Laboratory, MIT, BostonGoogle Scholar
  15. Masterman E, Rogers Y (2002) A framework for designing interactive multimedia to scaffold young children’s understanding of historical chronology. Instr Sci 30:221–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. O’Hara L, O’Hara M (2001) Teaching history 3–11: the essential guide. Continuum, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. O’Neil MJ (1992) Effects of familiarity and plan complexity on way-finding in simulated buildings. J Environ Psychol 12:319–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Partington G (1980) The idea of an historical education. NFER Publishing Company, WindsorGoogle Scholar
  19. Pedley J, Camfield L, Foreman N (2003) Navigating memories. In: Ahrends B, Thackara D (eds) Experiment: conversations in art and science. Wellcome Trust, London, pp 173–235Google Scholar
  20. Rose D, Foreman N (1999) Virtual reality: a new tool for psychology? Psychologist 12:550–554Google Scholar
  21. Ruddle RA, Payne SJ, Jones DM (1997) Navigating buildings in “desk-top” virtual environments: Experimental investigations using extended navigational experience. J Exp Psychol Appl 3:143–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smart L (1996) Using I.T. in primary school history. Cassell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Tolman EC (1948) Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol Rev 55:189–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Turner A (1998) “It would have been bad”. The development of historical imagination and empathy in a group of secondary age pupils with severe learning difficulties. Br J Spec Educ 25:164–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Underwood J, Underwood G (1990) Computers and learning. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Watson D (1993) The impact report: an evaluation of the impact of educational technology on children’s achievements. Kings College, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Wilson PN (1997) Use of virtual reality computing in spatial learning research. In: Foreman N, Gillett R (eds) Handbook of spatial research paradigms and methodologies: volume 1, Spatial cognition in the child and adult. Psychology Press, Hove, pp 181–206Google Scholar
  28. Wood L, Holden C (1995) Teaching early years history. Chris Kington Publishing, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Yaxley J (2004) Experiencing history. Teach Hist 42:24–25Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nigel Foreman
    • 1
  • Liliya Korallo
    • 1
  • David Newson
    • 1
  • Natalie Sarantos
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyMiddlesex UniversityEnfieldEngland

Personalised recommendations