Abstract
This article investigates the effect of presence on learning outcomes in educational virtual environments (EVEs) in a sample of 60 pupils aged between 11 and 13 years. We study the effect of personal presence, social presence and participant’s involvement on certain learning outcomes. We also investigate if the combination of the participant’s representation model in the virtual environment (VE) with the way it is presented gives a higher sense of presence that contributes to learning outcomes. Our results show that the existence of an avatar as the pupils’ representation enhanced presence and helped them to successfully perform their learning tasks. The pupils had a high sense of presence for both cases of the EVE presentation, projection on a wall and through a head mounted display (HMD). Our socialized virtual environment seems to play an important role in learning outcomes. The pupils had a higher sense of presence and completed their learning tasks more easily and successfully in the case of their egocentric representation model using the HMD.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antonietti A, Cantoia M (2000) To see a painting versus to walk in a painting: an experiment on sense-making through virtual reality. Comput Educ 34:213–223
Bakas Ch, Mikropoulos TA (2003) Design of virtual environments for the comprehension of planetary phenomena based on students’ ideas. Intl J Sci Educ 25(8):949–967
Biocca F (1997) The Cyborg’s dilemma: progressive embodiment in virtual environments. J Comput Mediat Commun 3(2). http://www.jcmc.huji.ac.il/vol3/issue2
Bricken W (1990) Learning in virtual reality. Technical report no. HITL-M-90-5. http://www.hitl.washington.edu/publications/m-90-5
Bystrom KE, Barfield W (1999) Collaborative task performance for learning using a virtual environment. Presence 8(4):435–448
Crosier JK, Cobb S, Wilson JR (2002) Key lessons for the design and interaction of virtual environments in secondary science. Comput Educ 38:77–94
Heeter C (1992) Being there: the subjective experience of presence. Presence 1(2):262–271
Helsel S (1992) Virtual reality and education. Educ Technol pp 38–42
Ijsselsteijn WA (2004) Presence in depth. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven
Johnson A, Moher T, Ohlsson S, Gillingham M (1999) The round earth project—collaborative VR for conceptual learning. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 19(6):60–69
Kameas A, Mikropoulos TA, Katsikis A, Emvalotis A, Pintelas P (2000) EIKON: Teaching a high-school technology course with the aid of virtual reality. Educ Inf Technol 5(4):305–315
Keating T, Barnett M, Barab SA, Hay KE (2002) The virtual solar system project: developing conceptual understanding of astronomical concepts through building three-dimensional computational models. J Sci Educ Technol 11(3):261–275
Kim T, Biocca F (1997) Telepresence via television: two dimensions of telepresense may have different connections to memory and persuasion. J Comput Mediat Commun 3(2). http://www.jcmc.huji.ac.il/vol3/issue2/kim.html
Lessiter J, Freeman J, Keogh E, Davidoff J (2000) Development of a new cross-media presence Questionnaire: the ITC-sense of presence inventory. In: Paper presented at 3rd international workshop on presence, Delft, 2003. http://www.presence-research.org
Lombard M, Ditton T (1997) At the heart of it all: the concept of telepresence. J Comput Mediat Commun 3(2). http://www.jcmc.huji.ac.il/vol3/issue2/lombard.html
Lombard M, Ditton T (2000) Measuring presence: A literature-based approach to the development of a standardized paper-and-pencil instrument. In: Paper presented at 3d international workshop on presence, Delft, 2003. http://www.presence-research.org
Mikropoulos TA, Strouboulis V (2004) Factors that influence presence in educational virtual environments. Cyberpsychol Behav 7(5):582–591
Mikropoulos TA, Chalkidis A, Katsikis A, Emvalotis A (1998) Students’ attitudes towards educational virtual environments. Educ Inf Technol 3:137–148
Mikropoulos TA, Katsikis A, Nikolou E, Tsakalis P (2003) Virtual environments in biology teaching. J Biol Educ 37(4):176–181
Mikropoulos TA, Tzimas E, Dimou GEl (2004) Objective presence measures through electric brain activity. In: Raya MA, Solaz BR (eds) Proceedings of the 7th annual international workshop on presence, Valencia, pp 259–265,
Milton J, Garbi A (2000) VIRLAN: collaborative foreign language learning on the internet for primary age children: problems and a solution. Educ Technol Soc 3(3):286–292
Pantelidis VS (1993) Virtual reality in the classroom. Educ technol pp 23–27
Pasqualotti A, Freitas dal Sasso CM (2002) MAT3D: a virtual reality modeling language environment for the teaching and learning of mathematics. Cyberpsychol Behav 5(5):409–422
Perkins DN (1991) Technology meets constructivism: do they make a marriage? Educ Technolpp 118–123
Roussos M, Johnson A, Moher T, Leigh J, Vasilakis C, Barnes C (1999) Learning and building together in an immersive virtual world. Presence 8(3):247–263
Salzman MC, Dede C, Loftin RB, Chen J (1999) A model for understanding how virtual reality aids complex conceptual learning. Presence 8(3):293–316
Schubert TW, Friedman F, Regenbrecht HT (1999) Embodied presence in virtual environments, visual representations and interpretations. Springer, London
Selverian MM, Hwang HS (2003) In search of presence: a systematic evaluation of evolving VLEs. Presence 12(5):512–522
Sheridan TB (1999) Descartes, Heidegger, Gibson, and God: Towards an eclectic ontology of presence. Presence 8(5):551–559
Slater M (1999) Measuring presence: a response to the Witmer and Singer Presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoper Virtual Environ 8(5):560–566
Slater M (2003) A note on presence terminology. PRESENCE-Connect 3(3). http://www.presence.cs.ucl.ac.uk/presenceconnect/articles/Feb2003
Slater M, Usoh M, Steed A (1994) Depth of presence in immersive virtual environments. Presence teleoperators virtual environ 3(2):130–144
Steuer JS (1992) Difining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. J Commun 42(4):73–93
Trindade J, Fiolhais C, Almeida L (2002) Science learning in virtual environments: a descriptive study. Br J Educ Technoly 33(4):471–488
Waterworth JA, Waterworth EL (2003) The meaning of presence. PRESENCE-Connect 3(3). http://www.presence.cs.ucl.ac.uk/presenceconnect/articles/Feb2003
Whitelock D, Romano D, Jelfs A, Brna P (2000) Perfect presence: what does this mean for the design of virtual learning environments? Educ Inf Technol 5(4):277–289
Winn W (1993) A conceptual basis for educational applications of virtual reality. Technical report no. TR-93-9. http://www.hitl.washington.edu/publications/r-93-9
Winn W, Windschitl M (2000) Learning science in virtual environments: the interplay of theory and experience. Themes Educ 1(4):373–389
Winn W, Hoffman H, Hollander A, Osberg K, Rose H, Char P (1999) Student-built virtual environments. Presence 8(3):283–292
Witmer BG, Singer MJ (1998) Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence 7(3):225–240
Acknowledgment
We thank Dr. Vassilios Strouboulis for developing the virtual environment and his assistance in conducting statistical analyses.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mikropoulos, T.A. Presence: a unique characteristic in educational virtual environments. Virtual Reality 10, 197–206 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-006-0039-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-006-0039-1