Affordances in the design of enactive systems
Enactive interfaces must incorporate intuitive activity that characterizes naturalistic perception. However, the manner in which information is presented is not more important than the contents: what information is presented. In this contribution, we address the contents of perception. We argue that people perceive affordances, that is, the possible actions that are available in any given situation. We further argue that enactive interfaces should be designed to optimize presentation of information about the possible actions that are available to a person using the enactive interface. The design of enactive interfaces might be guided by an extension of the theory of ecological interface design (Vicente in Hum Factors 44:62–78, 2002) to include multimodal information that is accessed through fast, intuitive exploratory movement. We review two empirical studies that illustrate our arguments. Careful analysis of affordances, together with our increasing understanding of the enactive perception of affordances, should influence the design of enactive interfaces.
KeywordsAffordances Perception-action Multimodal perception Enactive perception
- Gibson JJ (1986) The ecological approach to visual perception. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (original work published in 1979)Google Scholar
- Mantel B, Bardy BG, Stoffregen TA (2005) Intermodal specification of egocentric distance in a target reaching task. In: Heft H, Marsh KL (eds) Studies in perception and action VIII. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 173–176Google Scholar
- Oudejans RRD, Michaels CF, Bakker FC, Dolne M (1996) The relevance of action in perceiving affordances: perception of catchableness of fly balls. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22:683–703Google Scholar
- Thelen E, Smith LB (1994) A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Varela FJ, Thompson E, Rosch E (1991) The embodied mind. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar