Abstract
With the development of computer software and hardware in the past few years, it has been possible to produce effective training virtual environments on everyday personal computers with little expert training required for users or designers. However, the development of the equipment that enables this has brought little coinciding research on what features to include when designing these environments. Despite these increased advances in PC capabilities for desktop virtual environments (VEs), there are still limitations on the number of objects that can be programmed to be interactive, usually due to restrictions on programming time and cost. As a result, it is often left to the programmer to decide which of the objects included to increase the realism of the environment will be interactive and which aesthetic. The work presented in this paper is an experiment that aims to establish a guide for environment designers to aid effective environment interaction development by identifying key elements in a VE design.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For this reason interaction with doors within the environment was not included in the results section.
References
Marshall E, Nichols S, Wilson JR (2003) Interaction, control of movement and realism: establishing the factors influencing virtual reality training. In: Proceedings of the HCI International, (1):1188–1192
Herndon KP, Van Dam A, Gleicher M (1994) The challenges of 3D interaction. SIGCHI Bull 26(4):36–43
Bowman DA, Wingrave CA (2001) Design and evaluation of menu systems for immersive virtual environments. In: Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality, pp 149–156
Marsh T, Wright P (2000) Maintaining the illusion of interacting within a 3D virtual space. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on presence, Delft, The Netherlands
Poupyrev I, Weghorst S, Billinghurst M, Ichikawa T (1998) Egocentric object manipulation in virtual environments: empirical evaluation of interaction techniques. In: Proceedings of the Computer Graphics forum Eurographics’98, 17(3):41–52
Kaur K, Maiden N, Sutcliffe AG (1999a) Interacting with virtual environments: an evaluation model of interaction. Interact Comput (11):403–426
Norman DA (1988) The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books, New York
Eastgate R (2001) The structured development of virtual environments: enhancing functionality and interactivity. PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham
Benjamin LT, Hopkins RJ, Nation JR (1987) Psychology. Macmillan, New York
Hilgard ER, Atkinson RL, Atkinson RC (1979) Introduction to psychology. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York
Kaur Deol K, Sutcliffe AG, Maiden N (1999b) A design advice tool presenting usability guidance for virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the workshop on user centred design and implementation of virtual environments, York, UK
Patel H, Stedmon A, Nichols S, D’Cruz M (2003) Paper and pen based tools. Deliverable for work package 3: Usability Evaluation Criteria, Methodologies and Test Battery. VIEW of the Future IST-2000–26089
Nichols S (1999) Virtual reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE): methodological and theoretical issues. PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marshall, E., Nichols, S. Interaction with a desktop virtual environment: a 2D view into a 3D world. Virtual Reality 8, 17–25 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-004-0132-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-004-0132-2