Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Verdacht auf eine Sprunggelenksfraktur bei Älteren – Anwendung der Ottawa Ankle Rules

Suspected ankle fractures in the elderly—application of the Ottawa Ankle Rules

  • Notfall aktuell - Für Sie gelesen
  • Published:
Notfall + Rettungsmedizin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Daly PJ, Fitzgerald RH, Melton LJ, Llstrup DM (1987) Epidemiology of ankle fractures in Rochester, Minnesota. Acta Orthop Scand 58:539–544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jensen SL, Andresen BK, Mencke S, Nielsen PT (1998) Epidemiology of ankle fractures: a prospective population-based study of 212 cases in Aalborg, Denmark. Acta Orthop Scand 69:48–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gauthé R, Desseaux A, Rony L, Tarissi N, Dujardin F (2016) Ankle fractures in the elderly: treatment and results in 477 patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 102:S241–S244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stiell IG, McKnight RD, Greenberg GH, McDowell I, Nair RC, Wells GA et al (1994) Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules. JAMA 271:827–832

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. MacLellan J, Smith T, Baserman J, Dowling S (2018) Accuracy of the Ottawa ankle rules applied by non-physician providers in a pediatric emergency department. Can J Emerg Med 20:746–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rammelt S (2016) Management of ankle fractures in the elderly. EFORT Open Rev 1:239–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ellenbogen AL, Rice AL, Vyas P (2017) Retrospective comparison of the low risk ankle rules and the Ottawa ankle rules in a pediatric population. Am J Emerg Med 35:1262–1265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jenkin M, Sitler MR, Kelly JD (2010) Clinical usefulness of the Ottawa ankle rules for detecting fractures of the ankle and midfoot. J Athl Train 45:480–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang X, Chang SM, Yu GR, Rao ZT (2013) Clinical value of the Ottawa ankle rules for diagnosis of fractures in acute ankle injuries. PLoS ONE 8:e63228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pires R, Pereira A, Abreu-e-Silva G, Labronici P, Figueiredo L, Godoy-Santos A et al (2014) Ottawa ankle rules and subjective surgeon perception to evaluate radiograph necessity following foot and ankle sprain. Ann Med Health Sci Res 4:432–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bachmann LM, Kolb E, Koller MT, Steurer J, ter Riet G (2003) Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review. BMJ 326:417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Petscavage J, Baker SR, Clarkin K, Luk L (2010) Overuse of concomitant foot radiographic series in patients sustaining minor ankle injuries. Emerg Radiol 17:261–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Biberthaler P, Förschner L, Gehring C, Trentzsch H, Kanz K‑G, Prückner S (2019) Stellenwert der Unfallchirurgie für die Notaufnahmen einer deutschen Millionenstadt – Eine Auswertung von 524.716 Notfallpatienten. Unfallchirurg 122:44–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, Wells GA, McKnight RD, Cwinn AA, Cacciotti T et al (1995) Derivation of a decision rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries. Ann Emerg Med 26:405–413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL, Clement CM, Lesiuk H, De Maio VJ et al (2001) The Canadian C‑spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA 286:1841–1848

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zock M, Werner J, Bogner V, Biberthaler P, Kanz K‑G, Leidel B (2011) Internationale und nationale Leitlinien für die Indikation zur Bildgebung bei Verdacht auf leichtes Schädel-Hirn-Trauma. Notfall Rettungsmed 14:275–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hawley C, Rosenblatt R (1998) Ottawa and Pittsburgh rules for acute knee injuries. J Fam Pract 47:254–256

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Deutschland

    Noémie Rausch

Authors
  1. Noémie Rausch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noémie Rausch.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

N. Rausch gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rausch, N. Verdacht auf eine Sprunggelenksfraktur bei Älteren – Anwendung der Ottawa Ankle Rules. Notfall Rettungsmed 25, 45–47 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10049-020-00837-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10049-020-00837-x

Search

Navigation