Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

STEMI-Äquivalente und High-risk-NSTEMIs

Einfach und praktisch

STEMI equivalents and high-risk NSTEMIs

Simple and practical

  • Teamwork + Education
  • Published:
Notfall + Rettungsmedizin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 05 February 2018

This article has been updated

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1

Change history

  • 05 February 2018

    Correction:

    Notfall Rettungsmedizin 2017

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10049-017-0356-9

    Die in der Abbildung des Artikels beschriebenen modifizierten Sgarbossa-Kriterien wurden nicht präzise wiedergegeben.

    Nach eingehender Prüfung der Publikation und weiterer Literaturstellen korrigieren wir daher die …

Literatur

  1. De Winter RW, Adams R, Verouden NJ et al (2016) Precordial junctional ST-segment depression with tall symmetric T‑waves signifying proximal LAD occlusion, case reports of STEMI equivalence. J Electrocardiol 49:76–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. De Zwaan C, Bar FW, Janssen JH et al (1989) Angiographic and clinical characteristics of patients with unstable angina showing an ECG pattern indicating critical narrowing of the proximal LAD coronary artery. Am Heart J 117:657–665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. De Zwaan C, Bar FW, Wellens HJJ (1982) Characteristic electrocardiographic pattern indicating a critical stenosis high in left anterior descending coronary artery in patients admitted because of impending myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 103:730–736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goebel M, Bledsoe J, Orford JL et al (2014) A new ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction equivalent pattern? Prominent T wave and J‑point depression in the precordial leads associated with ST-segment elevation in lead aVr. Am J Emerg Med 32:287.e5–287.e8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Grautoff S (2017) Right bundle branch block, left bundle branch block, pace maker in case of acute coronary syndrome – Is the ECG of any value? Dtsch Med Wochenschr 142:123–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Herweg B, Marcus MB, Barold SS (2016) Diagnosis of myocardial infarction and ischemia in the setting of bundle branch block and cardiac pacing. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol 27:307–322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Meyers HP, Limkakeng AT Jr., Jaffa EJ et al (2015) Validation of the modified Sgarbossa criteria for acute coronary occlusion in the setting of left bundle branch block: a retrospective case-control study. Am Heart J 170:1255–1264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rhinehardt J, Brady WJ, Perron AD et al (2002) Electrocardiographic manifestations of Wellens’ syndrome. Am J Emerg Med 20:638–643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sgarbossa EB (1996) Recent advances in the electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction: left bundle branch block and pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19:1370–1379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sheng FQ, He MR, Zhang ML et al (2015) Wellens syndrome caused by spasm of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. J Electrocardiol 48:423–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), Steg PG, James SK et al (2012) ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 33:2569–2619

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Kardiologie, Klinikum Nürnberg, Universitätsklinikum der Paracelsus Medizinischen Privatuniversität; Zentrale Notaufnahme Klinikum Süd, Nürnberg, Deutschland

    P. Gotthardt,  K. Fessele &  M. Pauschinger

Authors
  1. P. Gotthardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Fessele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Pauschinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Gotthardt.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

P. Gotthardt, K. Fessele und M. Pauschinger geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Additional information

A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10049-018-0412-0.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gotthardt, P., Fessele, K. & Pauschinger, M. STEMI-Äquivalente und High-risk-NSTEMIs. Notfall Rettungsmed 21, 143–145 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10049-017-0356-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10049-017-0356-9

Search

Navigation