Zusammenfassung
Linksventrikuläre Unterstützungssysteme kommen aktuell immer häufiger zum Einsatz. Die Weiterentwicklung der Geräte mit inzwischen perkutaner Implantationsmöglichkeit und einfacherer Handhabung ermöglichen auch ohne herzchirurgischen Operationssaal eine Versorgung mit einem Unterstützungssystem. Dadurch ist es jetzt möglich, auch in kleineren Krankenhäusern ohne entsprechende Abteilung diese Systeme zur Anwendung zu bringen. Aus diesen Gründen werden in letzter Zeit auch immer häufiger Transporte von Patienten an Unterstützungssystemen aus kleineren Kliniken in spezialisierte Zentren durchgeführt. Dieser Übersichtsartikel soll die aktuell vorhandene Erfahrung mit den verschiedenen Systemen beim Patiententransport beleuchten.
Abstract
The use of left ventricular assist devices is becoming increasingly more common. Current developments allow percutaneous canulation without the setting of a cardiac surgery department or a perfusionist. This brings assist device treatment also to smaller facilities and makes the transfer of unstable patients from the primary clinic to specialized centers for extended treatment possible. This review describes the different systems and current experience in patient transfer.
Literatur
Arlt M, Philipp A, Voelkel S et al (2011) Hand-held minimised extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a new bridge to recovery in patients with out-of-centre cardiogenic shock. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 40:689–694
Arlt M, Philipp A, Voelkel S et al (2011) Out-of-hospital extracorporeal life support for cardiac arrest-A case report. Resuscitation 82:1243–1245
Brierley J, Carcillo JA, Choong K et al (2009) Clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock: 2007 update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med 37:666–688
Burkhoff D, Cohen H, Brunckhorst C et al (2006) A randomized multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device versus conventional therapy with intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock. Am Heart J 152:469 e461–e468
Cheng JM, Den Uil CA, Hoeks SE et al (2009) Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Eur Heart J 30:2102–2108
Ciapetti M, Cianchi G, Zagli G et al (2011) Feasibility of inter-hospital transportation using extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support of patients affected by severe swine-flu(H1N1)-related ARDS. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 19:32
Clement KC, Fiser RT, Fiser WP et al (2010) Single-institution experience with interhospital extracorporeal membrane oxygenation transport: A descriptive study. Pediatr Crit Care Med 11:509–513
Combes A, Leprince P, Luyt CE et al (2008) Outcomes and long-term quality-of-life of patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock. Crit Care Med 36:1404–1411
Coppola CP, Tyree M, Larry K et al (2008) A 22-year experience in global transport extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Pediatr Surg 3:46–52, discussion 52
Dellinger RP, Vincent JL, Marshall J et al (2008) Important issues in the design and reporting of clinical trials in severe sepsis and acute lung injury. J Crit Care 23:493–499
Engstrom AE, Cocchieri R, Driessen AH et al (2011) The Impella 2.5 and 5.0 devices for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients presenting with severe and profound cardiogenic shock: the Academic Medical Center intensive care unit experience. Crit Care Med 39:2072–2079
Forrest P, Ratchford J, Burns B et al (2011) Retrieval of critically ill adults using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an Australian experience. Intensive Care Med 37:824–830
Ganslmeier P, Philipp A, Rupprecht L et al (2011) Percutaneous cannulation for extracorporeal life support. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 59:103–107
Griffith KE, Jenkins E (2010) Abiomed Impella(®) 2.5 patient transport: lessons learned. Perfusion 25:381–386
Guirgis M, Kumar K, Zieroth S et al (2010) Interprovincial spoke-to-hub transport using the Impella Recover LP 5.0 left ventricular assist device as a bridge to long-term circulatory support. Can J Cardiol 26:320–322
Haneya A, Philipp A, Foltan M et al (2009) Extracorporeal circulatory systems in the interhospital transfer of critically ill patients: experience of a single institution. Ann Saudi Med 29:110–114
Lamarche Y, Cheung A, Ignaszewski A et al (2011) Comparative outcomes in cardiogenic shock patients managed with Impella microaxial pump or extracorporeal life support. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 142:60–65
Maunz O, Horisberger J, Von Segesser L (2008) Bridge to life: the Lifebridge B2T extracorporeal life support system in an in vitro trial. Perfusion 23:279–282
Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R et al (2009) Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 374:1351–1363
Perez A, Butt WW, Millar KJ et al (2008) Long-distance transport of critically ill children on extracorporeal life support in Australia. Crit Care Resusc 10:34
Philipp A, Arlt M, Amann M et al (2011) First experience with the ultra compact mobile extracorporeal membrane oxygenation system Cardiohelp in interhospital transport. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg
Phillips SJ, Ballentine B, Slonine D et al (1983) Percutaneous initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 36:223–225
Prodhan P, Fiser RT, Cenac S et al (2010) Intrahospital transport of children on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: indications, process, interventions, and effectiveness. Pediatr Crit Care Med 11:227–233
Seyfarth M, Sibbing D, Bauer I et al (2008) A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1584–1588
Staley LL, Dobberpuhl J, Pierce CN et al (2010) Bridge to decision: SWAT team approach used by Mayo Clinic Arizona’s cardiac transport team. Prog Transplant 20:118–124
Thiele H, Lauer B, Hambrecht R et al (2001) Reversal of cardiogenic shock by percutaneous left atrial-to-femoral arterial bypass assistance. Circulation 104:2917–2922
Thiele H, Sick P, Boudriot E et al (2005) Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J 26:1276–1283
Thiele H, Smalling RW, Schuler GC (2007) Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J 28:2057–2063
Wagner K, Sangolt GK, Risnes I et al (2008) Transportation of critically ill patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Perfusion 23:101–106
Werdan K, Ruß M, Buerke M et al (2011) Deutsch-österreichische S3-Leitlinie Infarktbedingter kardiogener Schock. Diagnose, Monitoring und Therapie. Kardiologe 5:166–224
Interessenskonflikt
Der korrespondierende Autor weist auf folgende Berziehungen hin:
G.F.: keine.
H.T.: Vortragshonorare und Wissenschaftsunterstützung Maquet Cardiovascular, Hirrlingen, Deutschland; Wissenschaftsunterstützung, Teleflex Medical, USA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fürnau, G., Thiele, H. Invasive Kreislaufunterstützungssysteme bei intra- und interhospitalen Transporten. Notfall Rettungsmed 14, 630–634 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10049-011-1417-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10049-011-1417-0
Schlüsselwörter
- Herzunterstützungssysteme
- Kardiogener Schock
- Patiententransfer
- Perkutane Kanülierung
- Extrakorporale Membranoxygenierung