Skip to main content
Log in

Die Bedeutung klinischer Studien in der Notfallmedizin

The impact of clinical studies in emergency medicine

  • Editorial
  • Published:
Notfall + Rettungsmedizin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Wenzel V, Krismer AC, Arntz HR et al. (2004) A comparison of vasopressin and epinephrine for out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. N Engl J Med 350: 105–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lindner KH, Brinkmann A, Pfenninger EG et al. (1993) Effect of vasopressin on hemodynamic variables, organ blood flow, and acid-base status in a pig model of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Anaesth Analg 77: 427-435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lindner KH, Dirks B, Strohmenger HU et al. (1997) Randomised comparison of epinephrine and vasopressin in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation. Lancet 349: 535–537

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA et al. (1996) Evidence based medicine: What it is – and what it isn’t. BMJ 312: 71–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wenzel V, Lindner KH (2006): Vasopressin combined with epinephrine during cardiac resuscitation: a solution for the future? Crit Care 10: 125-127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Weiß.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weiß, C. Die Bedeutung klinischer Studien in der Notfallmedizin. Notfall Rettungsmed 11, 25–27 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10049-007-1001-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10049-007-1001-9

Navigation