Pitt–Hopkins syndrome: phenotypic and genotypic description of four unrelated patients and structural analysis of corresponding missense mutations

Abstract

Pitt–Hopkins syndrome is an underdiagnosed neurodevelopmental disorder which is characterized by specific facial features, early-onset developmental delay, and moderate to severe intellectual disability. The genetic cause, a deficiency of the TCF4 gene, has been established; however, the underlying pathological mechanisms of this disease are still unclear. Herein, we report four unrelated children with different de novo mutations (T606A, K607E, R578C, and V617I) located at highly conserved sites and with clinical phenotypes which present variable degrees of developmental delay and intellectual disability. Three of these four missense mutations have not yet been reported. The patient with V617I mutation exhibits mild intellectual disability and has attained more advanced motor and verbal skills, which is significantly different from other cases reported to date. Molecular dynamics simulations are used to explore the atomic level mechanism of how missense mutations impair the functions of TCF4. Mutations T606A, K607E, and R578C are found to affect DNA binding directly or indirectly, while V617I only induces subtle conformational changes, which is consistent with the milder clinical phenotype of the corresponding patient. The study expands the mutation spectrum and phenotypic characteristics of Pitt–Hopkins syndrome, and reinforces the genotype–phenotype correlation and strengthens the understanding of phenotype variability, which is helpful for further investigation of pathogenetic mechanisms and improved genetic counseling.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. 1.

    Pitt D, Hopkins I (1978) A syndrome of mental retardation, wide mouth and intermittent overbreathing. Aust Paediatr J 14:182–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.1978.14.3.182

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Zollino M, Zweier C, Van Balkom ID, Sweetser DA, Alaimo J, Bijlsma EK, Cody J, Elsea SH, Giurgea I, Macchiaiolo M et al (2019) Diagnosis and management in Pitt-Hopkins syndrome: First international consensus statement. Clin Genet 95:462–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.13506

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Zweier C, Peippo MM, Hoyer J, Sousa S, Bottani A, Clayton-Smith J, Reardon W, Saraiva J, Cabral A, Gohring I et al (2007) Haploinsufficiency of TCF4 causes syndromal mental retardation with intermittent hyperventilation (Pitt-Hopkins syndrome). Am J Hum Genet 80:994–1001. https://doi.org/10.1086/515583

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Zweier C, Sticht H, Bijlsma EK, Clayton-Smith J, Boonen SE, Fryer A, Greally MT, Hoffmann L, den Hollander NS, Jongmans M et al (2008) Further delineation of Pitt-Hopkins syndrome: phenotypic and genotypic description of 16 novel patients. J Med Genet 45:738–744. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.2008.060129

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Zhuang, Cheng, Weintraub (1996) B-Lymphocyte development is regulated by the combined dosage of three basic helix-loop-helix genes, E2A, E2–2, and HEB. Mol Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.16.6.2898

  6. 6.

    Bergqvist E, Saarikettu C, Grundstron H (2000) The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor E2–2 is involved in T lymphocyte development. Eur J Immunol 30:2857–2863. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4141(200010)30:10%3C2857::AID-IMMU2857%3E3.0.CO;2-G

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cano A, Portillo F (2010) An emerging role for class I bHLH E2–2 proteins in EMT regulation and tumor progression. Cell Adh Migr 4:56–60. https://doi.org/10.4161/cam.4.1.9995

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bertrand N, Castro DS, Guillemot F (2002) Proneural genes and the specification of neural cell types. Nat Rev Neurosci 3:517–530. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn874

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Heng JIT, Tan SS (2010) The role of class I HLH genes in neural development–have they been overlooked? BioEssays 25:709–716. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.10299

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Corneliussen B, Thornell A, Hallberg B, Grundstrm T (1991) Helix-loop-helix transcriptional activators bind to a sequence in glucocorticoid response elements of retrovirus enhancers. J Virol 65:6084–6093. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.65.11.6084-6093.1991

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Yang J, Horton JR, Li J, Huang Y, Zhang X, Blumenthal RM, Cheng X (2019) Structural basis for preferential binding of human TCF4 to DNA containing 5-carboxylcytosine. Nucleic Acids Res 47:8375–8387. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz381

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Rosenfeld JA, Leppig K, Ballif BC, Thiese H, Erdie-Lalena C, Bawle E, Sastry S, Spence JE, Bandholz A, Surti U et al (2009) Genotype-phenotype analysis of TCF4 mutations causing Pitt-Hopkins syndrome shows increased seizure activity with missense mutations. Genet Med 11:797–805. https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181bd38a9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    de Pontual L, Mathieu Y, Golzio C, Rio M, Malan V, Boddaert N, Soufflet C, Picard C, Durandy A, Dobbie A et al (2009) Mutational, functional, and expression studies of the TCF4 gene in Pitt-Hopkins syndrome. Hum Mutat 30:669–676. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.20935

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Goodspeed K, Newsom C, Morris MA, Powell C, Evans P, Golla S (2018) Pitt-Hopkins syndrome: a review of current literature, clinical approach, and 23-patient case series. J Child Neurol 33:233–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073817750490

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Sparber P, Filatova A, Anisimova I, Markova T, Voinova V, Chuhrova A, Tabakov V, Skoblov M (2020) Various haploinsufficiency mechanisms in Pitt-Hopkins syndrome. Eur J Med Genet 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2020.104088

  16. 16.

    Kousoulidou L, Alexandrou A, Papaevripidou I, Evangelidou P, Tanteles G, Anastasiadou VC, Sismani C (2019) Two unrelated individuals carrying rare mosaic deletions in TCF4 gene. Am J Med Genet A 179:134–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.60692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Whalen S, Héron D, Gaillon T, Moldovan O, Rossi M, Devillard F, Giuliano F, Soares G, Mathieu-Dramard M, Afenjar A et al (2012) Novel comprehensive diagnostic strategy in Pitt-Hopkins syndrome: clinical score and further delineation of the TCF4 mutational spectrum. Hum Mutat 33:64–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.21639

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Sepp M, Pruunsild P, Timmusk T (2012) Pitt-Hopkins syndrome-associated mutations in TCF4 lead to variable impairment of the transcription factor function ranging from hypomorphic to dominant-negative effects. Hum Mol Genet 21:2873–2888. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/dds112

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Delano WL (2002) The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, DeLano Scientific, San Carlos

  20. 20.

    Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, Kondrashov AS, Sunyaev SR (2010) A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods 7:248–249. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth0410-248

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Choi Y, Chan AP (2015) PROVEAN web server: a tool to predict the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. Bioinformatics 31:2745–2747. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv195

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Shihab HA, Gough J, Cooper DN, Stenson PD, Barker GL, Edwards KJ, Day IN, Gaunt TR (2013) Predicting the functional, molecular, and phenotypic consequences of amino acid substitutions using hidden Markov models. Hum Mutat 34:57–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22225

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Schwarz JM, Cooper DN, Schuelke M, Seelow D (2014) MutationTaster2: mutation prediction for the deep-sequencing age. Nat Methods 11:361–362. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2890

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC (2009) Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc 4:1073–1081. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2009.86

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Gasteiger E, Gattiker A, Hoogland C, Ivanyi I, Appel RD, Bairoch A (2003) ExPASy: the proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3784–3788. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg563

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Case DA, Cheatham TE 3rd, Darden T, Gohlke H, Luo R, Merz KM Jr, Onufriev A, Simmerling C, Wang B, Woods RJ (2005) The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem 26:1668–1688. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20290

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Izadi S, Anandakrishnan R, Onufriev AV (2014) Building water models: a different approach. J Phys Chem Lett 5:3863–3871. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz501780a

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Zhang J, Luo H, Liu H, Ye W, Luo R, Chen HF (2016) Synergistic modification induced specific recognition between histone and TRIM24 via fluctuation correlation network analysis. Rep 6:24587. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24587

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Roe DR, Cheatham TE 3rd (2013) PTRAJ and CPPTRAJ: software for processing and analysis of molecular dynamics trajectory data. J Chem Theory Comput 9:3084–3095. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct400341p

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Fogolari F, Brigo A, Molinari H (2003) Protocol for MM/PBSA molecular dynamics simulations of proteins. Biophys J 85:159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74462-2

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Miller BR III, Mcgee TD Jr, Swails JM, Homeyer N, Gohlke H, Roitberg AE (2012) MMPBSA.py: an efficient program for end-state free energy calculations. J Chem Theory Comput. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct300418h

  32. 32.

    Lek M, Karczewski KJ, Minikel EV, Samocha KE, Banks E, Fennell T, O’Donnell-Luria AH, Ware JS, Hill AJ, Cummings BB et al (2016) Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature 536:285–291. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19057

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    De Winter CF, Baas M, Bijlsma EK, Van Heukelingen J, Routledge S, Hennekam RCM (2016) Phenotype and natural history in 101 individuals with Pitt-Hopkins syndrome through an internet questionnaire system. Orphanet J Rare Dis 11:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-016-0422-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Sweatt JD (2013) Pitt-Hopkins syndrome: intellectual disability due to loss of TCF4-regulated gene transcription. Exp Mol Med 45:e21. https://doi.org/10.1038/emm.2013.32

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Balkom IDCV, Vuijk PJ, Franssens M, Hoek HW, Hennekam RCM (2012) Development, cognition, and behaviour in Pitt-Hopkins syndrome. Dev Med Child Neurol 54:925–931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04339.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Laura T, Mari S, Timmusk T, Palgi M (2015) Introducing Pitt-Hopkins syndrome-associated mutations of TCF4 to Drosophila daughterless. Biology open 4:1762–1771. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.014696

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Rannals MD, Page SC, Campbell MN, Gallo RA, Mayfield B, Maher BJ (2016) Neurodevelopmental models of transcription factor 4 deficiency converge on a common ion channel as a potential therapeutic target for Pitt Hopkins syndrome. Rare Diseases 4:43–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/21675511.2016.1220468

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Tan A, Goodspeed K, Edgar VB (2018) Pitt-Hopkins syndrome: a unique case study. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 24:995–1002. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617718000668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bedeschi MF, Marangi G, Calvello MR, Ricciardi S, Leone FPC, Baccarin M, Guerneri S, Orteschi D, Murdolo M, Lattante S et al (2017) Impairment of different protein domains causes variable clinical presentation within Pitt-Hopkins syndrome and suggests intragenic molecular syndromology of TCF4. Eur J Med Genet 60:565–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2017.08.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Tripon F, Bogliș A, Micheu C, Streață I, Bănescu C (2020) Pitt-Hopkins syndrome: clinical and molecular findings of a 5-year-old patient. Genes 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11060596

  41. 41.

    Sun H, Yu G (2019) New insights into the pathogenicity of non-synonymous variants through multi-level analysis. Sci Rep 9:1667. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38189-9

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Chi YI, Stodola TJ, De Assuncao TM, Levrence EN, Tripathi S, Dsouza NR, Mathison AJ, Basel DG, Volkman BF, Smith BC et al (2021) Molecular mechanics and dynamic simulations of well-known Kabuki syndrome-associated KDM6A variants reveal putative mechanisms of dysfunction. Orphanet J Rare Dis 16:66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01692-w

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Liu Y, Guo Y, Liu P, Li F, Yang C, Song J, Hu J, Xin D, Chen Z (2018) A case of Pitt-Hopkins syndrome with de novo mutation in TCF4: clinical features and treatment for epilepsy. Int J Dev Neurosci 67:51–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2018.03.010

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the patients and their families for their participation in this study.

Funding

This research was funded by Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning (Grant No. 2018ZHYL0223).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, J.F.; methodology, J.F. and H.L.; software, T.Z. and G.Z.G.; validation, T.Z. and G.Z.G.; formal analysis, J.F., T.Z., and G.Z.G.; investigation, J.F., T.Z., and G.Z.G.; writing—original draft preparation, T.Z. and G.Z.G.; writing—review and editing, J.F., H.L., and S.W.; visualization, T.Z. and G.Z.G.; supervision, J.F. and G.Y.; project administration, J.F. and T.Z.; funding acquisition, G.Y. All the authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hui Lu or Jincai Feng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethical Committee of Children’s Hospital of Shanghai and informed consent was obtained from all the patients.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1120 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, T., Genchev, G.Z., Wu, S. et al. Pitt–Hopkins syndrome: phenotypic and genotypic description of four unrelated patients and structural analysis of corresponding missense mutations. Neurogenetics 22, 161–169 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10048-021-00651-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Pitt–Hopkins syndrome
  • TCF4
  • Missense mutations
  • Phenotypic diversity
  • Molecular dynamics simulation