Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of proactive combination therapy with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis on technique survival and mortality

  • Brief Communication
  • Artificial Kidney / Dialysis
  • Published:
Journal of Artificial Organs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Clinically relevant evidence for the timing of starting combination therapy with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis remains scarce. We retrospectively examined whether combination therapy during the induction phase of dialysis prolongs peritoneal dialysis duration.

Methods

This retrospective study includes 160 patients who underwent combination therapy from 20 dialysis facilities. Four groups were categorized: combination at peritoneal dialysis induction (n = 12, Proactive combination group), and combination following peritoneal dialysis durations of < 2 years (n = 65), 2–5 years (n = 70), or > 5 years (n = 13). Differences in technique survival of dialysis, mortality, and hospitalization due to cardiovascular events in the groups were observed.

Results

The Proactive combination group had the longer mean duration of combination therapy (3.18 years) comparing to that of combination therapy following peritoneal dialysis (1.45 years), but total peritoneal dialysis duration was shorter than in control groups (4.02 years). Of the 160 cases in the entire cohort, there were 8 deaths, 18 ischemic heart disease hospitalizations, and 18 stroke hospitalizations. The Proactive group had lower crude mortality rate (0/12 cases, 0.0%) and crude hospitalization rate for ischemic heart disease (1/11, 8.3%) than the other groups. However, this cohort study did not have enough statistical power to adjust for patients’ background, and we were unable to fully examine the differences in such clinical outcomes by the timing of initiation of combination therapy.

Conclusion

Use of combination therapy in the induction phase might prolong the duration of combination therapy, but is not necessarily effective for prolonging peritoneal dialysis technique survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Availability of data and material

The data that support the findings of this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author (KN).

References

  1. Churchill DN, Thorpe KE, Nolph KD, et al. Increased peritoneal membrane transport is associated with decreased patient and technique survival for continuous peritoneal dialysis patients. The Canada-USA (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998;9:1285–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fukui H, Hara S, Hashimoto Y, et al. Review of combination of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis as a modality of treatment for end-stage renal disease. Ther Apher Dial. 2004;8:56–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Io H, Nakata J, Inoshita H, et al. Literature review: Combined therapy with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis as renal replacement therapy. Ren Replace Ther. 2022;8:38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sriperumbuduri S, Biyani M, Brown PA, et al. Retrospective study of patients on hybrid dialysis: single-center data from North America. Perit Dial Int. 2020;40:224–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Agarwal M, Clinard P, Burkart JM. Combined peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: our experience compared to others. Perit Dial Int. 2003;23:157–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McIntyre CW. Bimodal dialysis: an integrated approach to renal replacement therapy. Perit Dial Int. 2004;24:547–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Murashima M, Hamano T, Abe M, et al. Combination of once-weekly haemodialysis with peritoneal dialysis is associated with lower mortality compared with peritoneal dialysis alone: a longitudinal study. Clin Kidney J. 2020;14:1610–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Banshodani M, Kawanishi H, Moriishi M, et al. Impact of hybrid therapy comprising peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis on acute cardiovascular events. Blood Purif. 2019;47:330–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kanda R, Io H, Nakata J, et al. Evaluation of long-term combination therapy with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. Ther Apher Dial. 2017;21:180–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nagai K, Ueda A. Sustainability of peritoneal dialysis and renal function with proactive combination therapy. J Artif Organs. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-022-01375-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tanaka M, Mise N. Need for evidence on long-term prognosis of PD+HD: a commentary. BMC Nephrol. 2021;22:10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Masakane I, Hasegawa T, Ogata S, et al. Peritoneal dialysis registry with 2013 survey report. Ther Apher Dial. 2016;20:557–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nitta K, Abe M, Masakane I, et al. Annual dialysis data report 2018, JSDT renal data registry: dialysis fluid quality, hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration, peritoneal dialysis, and diabetes. Ren Replace Ther. 2020;6:51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ito Y, Ryuzaki M, Sugiyama H, et al. Peritoneal dialysis guidelines 2019 part 1 (Position paper of the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy). Ren Replace Ther. 2021;7:40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ueda A, Nagai K, Hirayama A, et al. Combination therapy with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis from the initiation of renal replacement therapy preserves residual renal function and serum albumin. Adv Perit Dial. 2017;2017:74–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Acchiardo SR, Hatten KW, Ruvinsky MJ, et al. Inadequate dialysis increases gross mortality rate. ASAIO J. 1992;38:M282–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tanaka M, Ishibashi Y, Hamasaki Y, et al. Hospitalization for patients on combination therapy with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis compared with hemodialysis. Kidney Int Rep. 2020;5:468–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Chung MC, Yu TM, Wu MJ, et al. Is combined peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis redundant? A nationwide study from Taiwan. BMC Nephrol. 2020;21:348.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Tsutomu Sakurada (St. Marianna University Hospital), Tomo Suzuki (Kameda Medical Center), Naohiro Toda (Kansai Electric Power Hospital), Atsunori Yoshino (Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical center), Kyoko Maesato (Tokyo-Nishi Tokushukai Hospital), Mari Ishida, Takayo Miyakogawa (Tokai University Hachioji Hospital), Masato Ikeda, Izumi Shirai, Kyohei Ogawa, Kentaro Oshiro (The Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital), Hiroaki Io (The Juntendo University Nerima Hospital), Toshihiro Asai (Osaka City General Hospital), Arai Taichi, Ken Sakai (Toho University Omori Medical Center), Hidetoshi Kikuchi (Beppu Medical Center), Harumichi Higashi (St Mary's Hospital), Shotaro Naito (Tokyo Medical And Dental University Hospital), Tomohiro Kaneko (Nippon Medical School Tama Nagayama Hospital), Koji Hashimoto (Shinshu University Hospital), Morikuni Nishihira, Haruka Eda (Yuuai Medical Center), Hideki Yokoi (Kyoto University Hospital), Yukio Maruyama (The Jikei University Hospital), and Maiko Furuya and Mahiro Kurashige (The Jikei University Katsushika Medical Center) for participating in the study and contributing to data collection.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception, design, and supervision of the study: AU. Data analysis: KN. Data collection: AU. Writing of the first draft of the manuscript: KN. All the authors agree with the manuscript results, conclusions, and publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kei Nagai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors have declared no competing interests.

Ethical approval

The ethics committee at Hitachi General Hospital approved this study protocol (approval no. #2020–111), and waived the need to obtain informed consent from each subject based on the use of an opt-out format (https://www.hitachi.co.jp/hospital/hitachi/infor/opto-out/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2022/02/28/2021-93.pdf). Trial registration: UMIN-CTR, UMIN000050421, Registered 24 Feb 2023–Retrospectively registered, https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000057417.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nagai, K., Ueda, A. Effect of proactive combination therapy with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis on technique survival and mortality. J Artif Organs (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-024-01437-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-024-01437-z

Keywords

Navigation