Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The angle of the outflow graft to the aorta can affect recirculation due to aortic insufficiency under left ventricular assist device support

  • Original Article
  • Artificial Heart (Basic)
  • Published:
Journal of Artificial Organs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aortic insufficiency (AI) is a crucial complication during continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support. Our previous clinical study suggested that a larger angle between the outflow graft and the aorta (O–A angle) could cause AI progression. This study examined the effect of the O–A angle on the hemodynamics of AI under LVAD support in an acute animal experimental model. An LVAD was installed in seven calves, with the inflow cannula inserted from the LV apex and with the outflow graft sutured at the ascending aorta. The AI model was made using a temporary inferior vena cava filter inserted from the LV apex and placed at the aortic valve. Cardiac dysfunction was induced by continuous beta-blocker infusion. Hemodynamic values and the myocardial oxygen extraction rate (O2ER) were evaluated at three O–A angles (45°, 90°, and 135°) over three levels of AI (none, Sellers I–II AI, and Sellers III–IV AI). The recirculation rate, defined as the percentage of regurgitation flow to LVAD output, was calculated. Systemic flow tended to decrease with a larger O–A angle. The recirculation rate was significantly increased with a larger O–A angle (22, 23, and 31% at 45°, 90°, and 135° in Sellers III–IV AI, respectively). Coronary artery flow was decreased at a larger O–A angle (86, 76 and 75 mL/min at 45°, 90°, and 135° in Sellers I–II AI, respectively, and 77, 67, and 56 mL/min at 45°, 90°, and 135° in Sellers III–IV AI, respectively). O2ER tended to increase with a larger O–A angle (40, 43, and 49% at 45°, 90°, and 135° in Sellers III–IV AI, respectively). A larger O–A angle can increase the recirculation due to AI and can be disadvantageous to LVAD-AI hemodynamics and myocardial oxygen metabolism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Toda K, Fujita T, Domae K, Shimahara Y, Kobayashi J, Nakatani T. Late aortic insufficiency related to poor prognosis during left ventricular assist device support. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:929–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pak SW, Uriel N, Takayama H, Cappleman S, Song R, Colombo PC, et al. Prevalence of de novo aortic insufficiency during long-term support with left ventricular assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010;29:1172–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rajagopal K, Daneshmand MA, Patel CB, Ganapathi AM, Schechter MA, Rogers JG, et al. Natural history and clinical effect of aortic valve regurgitation after left ventricular assist device implantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:1373–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cowger J, Pagani FD, Haft JW, Romano MA, Aaronson KD, Kolias TJ. The development of aortic insufficiency in left ventricular assist device-supported patients. Circ Heart Fail. 2010;3:668–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Patil NP, Sabashnikov A, Mohite PN, Garcia D, Weymann A, Zych B, et al. De novo aortic regurgitation after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:850–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Atkins BZ, Hashmi ZA, Ganapathi AM, Harrison JK, Hughes GC, Rogers JG, et al. Surgical correction of aortic valve insufficiency after left ventricular assist device implantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;146:1247–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fujita T, Kobayashi J, Hata H, Seguchi O, Sato T, Yanase M, et al. Aortic valve closure for rapidly deteriorated aortic insufficiency after continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation. J Artif Organs. 2013;16:98–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. May-Newman K, Hillen B, Dembitsky W. Effect of left ventricular assist device outflow conduit anastomosis location on flow patterns in the native aorta. ASAIO J. 2006;52:132–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Aliseda A, Chivukula VK, McGah P, Prisco AR, Beckman JA, Garcia GJ, et al. LVAD outflow graft angle and thrombosis risk. ASAIO J. 2017;63:14–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Benk C, Mauch A, Beyersdorf F, Klemm R, Russe M, Blanke P, et al. Effect of cannula position in the thoracic aorta with continuous left ventricular support: four-dimensional flow-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging in an in vitro model. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;44:551–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Iizuka K, Nishinaka T, Ichihara Y, Miyamoto T, Yamazaki K. Outflow graft anastomosis site design could be correlated to aortic valve regurgitation under left ventricular assist device support. J Artif Organs. 2018;21:150–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Iizuka K, Nishinaka T, Takewa Y, Yamazaki K, Tatsumi E. The influence of pump rotation speed on hemodynamics and myocardial oxygen metabolism in left ventricular assist device support with aortic valve regurgitation. J Artif Organs. 2017;20:194–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Iizuka K, Nishinaka T, Naito N, Akiyama D, Takewa Y, Yamazaki K, et al. Left heart pressures can be the key to know the limitation of left ventricular assist device support against progression of aortic insufficiency. J Artif Organs. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-018-1027-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamazaki K, Saito S, Kihara S, Tagusari O, Kurosawa H. Completely pulsatile high flow circulatory support with a constant-speed centrifugal blood pump: mechanisms and early clinical observations. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;55:158–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamazaki K, Kihara S, Akimoto T, Tagusari O, Kawai A, Umezu M, et al. EVAHEART an implantable centrifugal blood pump for long-term circulatory support. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;50:461–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the work of past and present members of our laboratory. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP17K16602. This work was also supported by Yoshimi Memorial T.M.P. Grant from JSAO 2015.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kei Iizuka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Kenji Yamazaki has received consulting fees from Sun Medical Technology Research Corporation (Nagano, Japan). The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iizuka, K., Nishinaka, T., Akiyama, D. et al. The angle of the outflow graft to the aorta can affect recirculation due to aortic insufficiency under left ventricular assist device support. J Artif Organs 21, 399–404 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-018-1064-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-018-1064-z

Keywords

Navigation