Skip to main content
Log in

Blood glucose control using an artificial pancreas reduces the workload of ICU nurses

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Artificial Organs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Blood glucose management is one of the important therapies in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, blood glucose management using the sliding-scale method increases the workload of ICU nurses. An artificial pancreas, STG-22, has been developed to continuously monitor blood glucose levels and to maintain them at appropriate levels. In this study, we examined the hypothesis that compared to conventional methods, blood glucose management using the STG-22 reduces the workload of ICU nurses and has a positive impact on awareness regarding the management of blood glucose. This study included 45 patients who underwent elective surgery and were treated at the ICU postoperatively. The patients were separated into the following two groups: (1) blood glucose was maintained using the STG-22 (AP group) and (2) blood glucose was maintained using the sliding-scale method (SS group). In addition, a questionnaire was developed for an awareness survey of ICU nurses (N = 20). The frequency of blood sampling and number of double checks were significantly lower in the AP group (1.3 ± 1.4 vs. 8.9 ± 8.1 times/admission, P < 0.001; 1.0 ± 1.4 vs. 9.8 ± 8.5 times/admission, P < 0.001). The time needed for glucose management per admission was significantly shorter in the AP group (9 ± 13 vs. 27 ± 24 min/admission; P = 0.003). Use of STG-22 for glucose management in the ICU increased the degree of attention given by nurses to glucose management and contributed to an improved sense of security. In conclusion, using the STG-22 in the ICU reduces the workload of ICU nurses compared to using the sliding-scale method. It also contributed to the reduction of the ICU nurses’ anxiety related to the management of blood glucose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lipshutz AKM, Gropper MA. Perioperative glycemic control. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:408–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hanazaki K, Maeda H, Okabayashi T. Tight perioperative glycemic control using an artificial endocrine pancreas. Surg Today. 2010;40:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwaest C, Bruyninckx F, Schetz M, Vlasselaers D, Ferdinande P, Lauwers P, Bouillon R. Intensive insulin therapy in the critical ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1359–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brunkhorst FM, Engel C, Bloos F, Meier-Hellmann A, Ragaller M, Weiler N, Moerer O, Gruendling M, Oppert M, Grond S, Olthoff D, Jaschinski U, John S, Rossaint R, Welte T, Schaefer M, Kern P, Kuhnt E, Kiehntopf M, Hartog C, Natanson C, Loeffler M, Reinhart K. German Competence Network Sepsis (SepNet) Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:125–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. NICE-SUGAR study investigators. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1283–97.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bellomo R, Egi M. What is a NICE-SUGAR for patients in the intensive care unit? Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:400–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Okabayashi T, Nishimori I, Maeda H, Yamashita K, Yatabe T, Hanazaki K. Effect of intensive insulin therapy using a closed-loop glycemic control system in hepatic resection patients: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1425–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Garrouste-Orgeas M, Timsit JF, Vesin A, Schwebel C, Arnodo P, Lefrant JY, Souweine B, Tabah A, Charpentier J, Gontier O, Fieux F, Mourvillier B, Troché G, Reignier J, Dumay MF, Azoulay E, Reignier B, Carlet J, Soufir L, OUTCOMEREA Study Group. Selected medical errors in the intensive care unit: results of the IATROREF study: parts I and II. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181:134–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yatabe T, Yamazaki R, Kitagawa H, Okabayashi T, Yamashita K, Hanazaki K, Yokoyama M. The evaluation of the ability of closed loop glycemic control device to maintain the blood glucose concentration in ICU patients. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:575–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yamashita K, Okabayashi T, Yokoyama T, Yatabe T, Maeda H, Manabe M, Hanazaki K. The accuracy of a continuous blood glucose monitor during surgery. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:160–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Okabayashi T, Hanazaki K, Nishimori I, Sugimoto T, Maeda H, Yatabe T, Dabanaka K, Kobayashi M, Yamashita K. Continuous post-operative blood glucose monitoring and control using a closed-loop system in patients undergoing hepatic resection. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;53:1405–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, Bion J, Parker MM, Jaeschke R, Reinhart K, Angus DC, Brun-Buisson C, Beale R, Calandra T, Dhainaut JF, Gerlach H, Harvey M, Marini JJ, Marshall J, Ranieri M, Ramsay G, Sevransky J, Thompson BT, Townsend S, Vender JS, Zimmerman JL, Vincent JL. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:296–327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee A, Faddoul B, Sowan A, Johnson KL, Silver KD, Vaidya V. Computerisation of a paper-based intravenous insulin protocol reduces errors in a prospective crossover simulated tight glycaemic control study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2010;26:161–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Valentin A, Capuzzo M, Guidet B, Moreno R, Metnitz B, Bauer P, Metnitz P; Research Group on Quality Improvement of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM); Sentinel Events Evaluation (SEE) Study Investigators. Errors in administration of parenteral drugs in intensive care units. multinational prospective study. BMJ. 2009;338:b814.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by The Kochi University President’s Discretionary Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kiyo Mibu or Tomoaki Yatabe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mibu, K., Yatabe, T. & Hanazaki, K. Blood glucose control using an artificial pancreas reduces the workload of ICU nurses. J Artif Organs 15, 71–76 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-011-0611-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-011-0611-7

Keywords

Navigation