Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A time-delay calibrated method for cornea hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement

  • Special Section: Regular Paper
  • The 5th Asian and Pacific-Rim Symposium on Biophotonics, (APBP’15), Yokohama, Japan
  • Published:
Optical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The presence of cornea hysteresis (CH) in characterizing the intraocular pressure (IOP) of a human eye deteriorates the accuracy of IOP. To suppress CH, the pressure gauge of a tonometer must be located as close as possible to the cornea. However, this arrangement is unpractical because appropriate working distance to the cornea is required. In this paper, a time-delay calibrated (TDC) method is proposed to counteract the undesired effect of CH in characterizing the IOP. Employing this TDC method, the CH approaches to zero for most eyes measured.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Forbes, M., Pico, G., Grolman, B.: A noncontact applanation tonometer. Description and clinical evaluation. Arch. Ophthalmol. 91, 134 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kling, S., Bekesi, N., Dorronsoro, C., Pascual, D., Marcos, S.: Corneal viscoelastic properties from finite-element analysis of in vivo air-puff deformation. PLoS One 9, e104904 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Šilih, M.Š., Hawlina, M.: Influence of corneal thickness on comparative intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann and non-contact tonometers in keratoconus. Klin. Monatsbl. Augenheilkd. 220, 843 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, J., Herndon, L.W., Asrani, S.G., Stinnett, S., Allingham, R.R.: Clinical comparison of the Proview eye pressure monitor with the Goldmann applanation tonometer and the Tonopen. Arch. Ophthalmol. 122, 1117 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lleo, A., Marcos, A., Calatayud, M., Alonso, L., Rahhal, S.M., Sanchis-Gimeno, J.A.: The relationship between central corneal thickness and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Clin. Exp. Optom. 86, 104 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gatinel, D., Chaabouni, S., Adam, P.A., Munck, J., Puech, M., Hoang-Xuan, T.: Corneal hysteresis, resistance factor, topography, and pachymetry after corneal lamellar flap. J. Refract. Surg. 23, 76 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sathi Devi, A.V.: The ocular response analyzer. J. Curr. Glaucoma Pract. 3, 24 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Congdon, N.G., Broman, A.T., Bandeen-Roche, K., Grover, D., Quigley, H.A.: Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 141, 868 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Che-Liang Tsai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, KJ., Tsai, CL., Wang, W. et al. A time-delay calibrated method for cornea hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement. Opt Rev 23, 340–345 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10043-015-0168-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10043-015-0168-4

Keywords

Navigation