Skip to main content
Log in

A method to evaluate error correction ability of computer controlled optical surfacing process

  • Regular Papers
  • Published:
Optical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantitatively investigating error correction ability in frequency domain is important for computer controlled optical surfacing (CCOS) process to correct different spatial frequency errors. Based on the mathematical model coherence between filtering and material removal process of CCOS, a method is proposed to quantitatively evaluate the correction ability of CCOS process. A generalized model named normalized smoothing spectral function (SSF) will be established combine convolution model of CCOS and power spectral density (PSD) function. A set of polishing experiments are performed to calculate SSF curves and validate SSF model. By comparing the results of SSF curve with PSD curve and surface figure, it reveals that SSF curve can quantitatively indicate the correction ability of CCOS process for different spatial frequency errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y. J. Wan, C. Y. Shi, J. H. Yuan, and F. Wu: Proc. SPIE 7655 (2010) 765511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Hull, M. J. Riso, J. M. Barentine, and A. Magruder: Proc. SPIE 8353 (2012) 835329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. M. Tamkin and T. D. Milster: Appl. Opt. 49 (2010) 6522.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. R. N. Youngworth and B. D. Stone: Appl. Opt. 39 (2000) 2198.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. J. M. Tamkin, W. J. Dallas, and T. D. Milster: Appl. Opt. 49 (2010) 4814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. C. R. Dunn and D. D. Walker: Opt. Express 16 (2008) 18942.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Hu, Y. Dai, and X. Peng: Opt. Express 18 (2010) 22973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D. W. Kim and J. H. Burge: Opt. Express 18 (2010) 2242.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. P. K. Mehta and P. B. Reid: Proc. SPIE 3786 (1999) 447.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. M. T. Tuell, J. H. Burge, and B. Anderson: Opt. Eng. 41 (2002) 1473.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. T. Tuell: Master’s Theses (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. W. Kim, W. H. Park, H. K. An, and J. H. Burge: Opt. Express 18 (2010) 22515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R. A. Jones: Appl. Opt. 16 (1977) 218.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. J. M. Elson and J. M. Bennett: Appl. Opt. 34 (1995) 201.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. R. N. Youngworth, B. B. Gallagher, and B. L. Stamper: Proc. SPIE 5869 (2005) 58690U.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jia Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Fan, B., Wan, Y. et al. A method to evaluate error correction ability of computer controlled optical surfacing process. OPT REV 21, 280–285 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10043-014-0042-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10043-014-0042-9

Keywords

Navigation