Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contrast Adaptation Effects under Interocular Suppression for Normal and Strabismic Observers

  • VISION
  • Published:
Optical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our vision system receives two different images from our two eyes. Since these two images usually have high correlation they are fused into a single stable image. In binocular rivalry suppression a stimulus presented in one eye is suppressed and a different stimulus in the other eye is perceived for a certain time interval. For strabismic observers the suppression is continuous between different retinal images caused by misalignment of eye positions. Previous research investigated the effects of this binocular rivalry suppression on a number of visual processes. The present study looked at the effects of contrast adaptation for the adaptation stimulus presented to eyes under interocular suppression. We compared normal and strabismic observers and found that in both types, regardless of the existence of suppression, there was the effect of contrast adaptation. These findings provide evidence that the suppression occurs at a site in the visual system after the locus of contrast adaptation. The contrast adaptation strength differed in the two types of observers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Blake: Percept. Psychophys. 29 (1981) 77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Karein: Vision Res. 29 (1989) 1325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. N. W. Daw: Visual Development (Plenum Press, New York, London, 1985) pp. 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. W. Freemen and N. Jolly: Vision Res. 34 (1994) 2043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. S. de Belsune and R. Sireteanu: Invest. Ophthalmol Vision Sci. 32 (1991) 2645.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. L. Smith 3d, D. M. Levi, R. E. Manny, R. S. Harwerth and J. M. White: Invest. Ophthalmol Vision Sci. 26 (1985) 80.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Bonneh, D. Sagi and A. Krmi: Vision Res. 41 (2001) 981.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. R. Blake and R. Fox: Vision Res. 14 (1973) 687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Blake and R. Fox: Nature 249 (1974) 488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Blakemore and F. W. Campbell: J. Physiol. 203 (1969) 237.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. H. R. Wilson and D. K. McFarlane: J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1 (1984) 124.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. R. Wilson, D. K. McFarlane and G. C. Phillips: Vision Res. 23 (1983) 873.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Shioiri: Handbook of Visual Information Processing (Asakura Press, Tokyo, 1999) pp. 200–210.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Blake and R. Overton: Perception 8 (1979) 143.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Atkinson and F. W. Campbell: Vision Res. 14 (1974) 159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mieko Yanagisawa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yanagisawa, M., Uchikawa, K. Contrast Adaptation Effects under Interocular Suppression for Normal and Strabismic Observers. OPT REV 9, 176–181 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10043-002-0176-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10043-002-0176-z

Key words

Navigation