Skip to main content
Log in

Enhanced groundwater vulnerability assessment in geological homogeneous areas: a case study from the Argentine Pampas

Détermination améliorée de la vulnérabilité de l’eau souterraine dans des domaines géologiques homogènes: une étude de cas des Pampas d’Argentine

Evaluación optimizada de la vulnerabilidad de aguas subterráneas en área geológicas homogénes: un caso de estudio de las Pampas de Argentina

均质地区增强型地下水脆弱性评价: 以阿根廷Pampas地区为例

Melhoria da avaliação da vulnerabilidade da água subterrânea em áreas geológicas homogéneas: um estudo de caso nas Pampas Argentinas

  • Paper
  • Published:
Hydrogeology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The southeast area of the Argentine Pampas is characterized by the presence of an unconfined aquifer in a wide plain. A methodology is proposed that deals with the aquifer vulnerability where the homogeneity of the hydrogeological variables used by traditional methods (in this case, DRASTIC-P) causes vulnerability maps to show more than 80% of the territory under the same class. This absence of discrimination renders vulnerability maps of little use to decision-makers. In addition, the proposed methodology avoids the traditional vague classification (high, low, and moderate vulnerability) which is highly dependent on subjectivity in its association of each class with hydrogeological considerations. That traditional vulnerability assessment methodology was adapted using a geographic information system to reclassify classes, based on the Natural Breaks (Jenks) method. The pixel-to-pixel comparison between the result obtained by the DRASTIC-P and the reclassified classes generates the so-called operational vulnerability index (OVI), which shows four classes, associating each with different hydrogeological requirements to make decisions.

Résumé

La région du Sud-est des Pampas d’Argentine est caractérisée par la présence d’un aquifère libre dans une vaste plaine. Une méthodologie est proposée qui traite de la vulnérabilité de l’aquifère lorsque l’homogénéité des variables hydrogéologiques utilisées par les méthodes traditionnelles ( dans ce cas, DRASTIC-P) amène les cartes de vulnérabilité à représenter plus de 80% du territoire dans la même classe. Cette absence de précision rend les cartes de vulnérabilité peu utilisables pour les décideurs. De plus, la méthodologie proposée évite la classification imprécise traditionnelle (vulnérabilité élevée, faible et modérée) qui est extrêmement influencée par la subjectivité par l’association de chaque classe à des considérations hydrogéologiques. Cette méthodologie de détermination traditionnelle de la vulnérabilité a été adaptée par l’utilisation d’un système d’information géographique pour une redéfinition des classes, basée sur la méthode des Seuils Naturels (Jenks). La comparaison pixel par pixel entre le résultat obtenu par DRASTIC-P et les classes redéfinies détermine le dénommé index de vulnérabilité opérationnel (IVO) qui fournit quatre classes, en associant chacune à des exigences hydrogéologiques différentes dans le but de prendre des décisions.

Resumen

El área sudeste de las Pampas de Argentina está caracterizada por la presencia de un acuífero no confinado en una amplia llanura. Se propone una metodología que trata la vulnerabilidad del acuífero donde la homogeneidad de las variables hidrogeológicas usadas por los métodos tradicionales (en este caso, DRASTIC-P) produce mapas de vulnerabilidad que muestran más del 80% de territorio bajo la misma clase. Esta ausencia de discriminación da mapas de vulnerabilidad de poca utilidad para los tomadores de decisiones. Además, la metodología propuesta evita la clasificación ambigua tradicional (vulneralidad alta, baja y moderada) que es altamente dependiente de la subjetividad en su asociación de cada clase con consideraciones hidrogeológicas. Esta metodología tradicional de evaluación de la vulnerabilidad fue adaptada usando un sistema de información geográfica para reclasificar clases, basado en el método Natural Breaks (Jenks). La comparación pixel a pixel entre los resultados obtenidos por DRASTIC-P y el de las clases reclasificadas genera, los así llamados índices de vulnerabilidad operacional (OVI), que muestran cuatro clases, asociando cada una con diferentes requerimientos hidrogeológicos para la toma de decisiones.

摘要

阿根廷Pampas地区东南部的特点是在广阔的平原上存在非承压含水层。本文提出了一种在水文地质条件均一地区进行脆弱性评价的方法, 在这类地区用传统方法 (这里指DRASTIC-P) 绘制脆弱性地图, 得到的结果往往是超过80%的范围脆弱性等级相同。分级的缺失使得这样的脆弱性地图对决策者用处不大。另外, 提出的新方法避开了传统的模糊分类 (高、中和低脆弱性), 该分类中的每一个级别对与其相关联的水文地质结构的认识主观性很强。将传统的脆弱性评价方法用于地理信息系统, 在Natural Breaks (Jenks)方法分类的基础上进行再分类。对DRASTIC-P得到的结果和再分类的结果进行由像素到像素的比较得到了一个所谓的实用型脆弱性指标 (OVI): 有四个级别, 每种级别都能符合不同水文地质条件的需求, 以便做出决策。

Resumo

A região sudeste das Pampas Argentinas é caracterizada pela presença de um aquífero livre numa ampla planície. Propõe-se uma metodologia para calcular a vulnerabilidade do aquífero quando a homogeneidade das variáveis hidrogeológicas usadas pelos métodos tradicionais (como DRASTIC-P) fazem com que os mapas de vulnerabilidade mostrem que mais de 80% do território ficam sob a mesma classe. Esta ausência de discriminação torna os mapas de vulnerabilidade de pouca utilidade para os decisores. Adicionalmente, a metodologia proposta evita a tradicional classificação vaga (vulnerabilidade alta, moderada e baixa), a qual é extremamente dependente da subjectividade, pela associação de cada classe a considerações hidrogeológicas. A metodologia tradicional de avaliação de vulnerabilidade foi adaptada, tendo para o efeito sido utilizado um sistema de informação geográfica para reclassificar as classes, com base no método das quebras naturais de Jenks (Jenks’ Natural Breaks). A comparação pixel-a-pixel entre o resultado obtido com DRASTIC-P e com as classes reclassificadas dá origem a um designado índice de vulnerabilidade operacional (operational vulnerability index, OVI) que mostra quatro classes, associando-se cada uma delas a diferentes requisitos hidrogeológicos necessários para a tomada de decisões.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen A, Milenic D (2007) Groundwater vulnerability assessment of the Cork Harbour area, SW Ireland. Env Geol 53:485–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aller L, Bennett T, Lehr J, Petty R (1987) DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating ground water pollution. Doc. EPA/600/2-85/018, US EPA, Washington, DC, 157 pp

  • Auge, M (2004) Vulnerabilidad de Acuíferos: Conceptos y Métodos [Aquifers vulnerability: concepts and methodologies]. Available via:http://tierra.rediris.es/hidrored/ebvulnerabilidad.html. Cited 30 July 2009

  • Civita M, De Maio M (2004) Assessing and mapping groundwater vulnerability to contamination: the Italian “combined” approach. GeofiÂs Int 43(4):513–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer W, Vrba J (1987) Vulnerability mapping. Proceedings of the International Conference on Vulnerability of Soil and Groundwater to Pollutants. Woordrijk aan Zee, The Netherlands, 30 March–3 April 1987, pp 45–48

  • Dalla Salda L, Iñiguez M (1978) La Tinta: Precámbrico y Paleozoico de Buenos Aires [“La Tinta”: Precambric and Paleozoic of Buenos Aires]. VII Congreso Geológico Argentino, Neuquén, Argentina, vol 1, pp 539–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster S (1987) Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy. In: van Duijvenbooden W, van Waegeningh H (eds) Vulnerability of soil and groundwater to pollutants. Proceedings and Information no. 38, TNO Committee on Hydrological Research, The Hague, pp 69–86

  • Foster S, Hirata R, Gomes D, D´Elia M, y Paris, M (2002). Protección de la Calidad del Agua Subterránea [Protection of groundwater quality]. GW-MATE-UNESCO-World Bank, Washington, DC, 115 pp

  • Frind E, Molson J, Rudolph D (2006) Well vulnerability: a quantitative approach for source water protection. Ground Water 44(5):732–742

    Google Scholar 

  • GEAM (Associazione Georisorce é ambiente) (2005). Aquifer vulnerability and risk. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop, CNR-GNDCI, Parma, Italy, September 2005

  • Gogu R, Dassargues A (2000) Current trends and future challenges in groundwater vulnerability assessment using overlay and index methods. Env Geol 39(6):549–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gogu R, Hallet V, Dassargues A (2003) Comparison of aquifer vulnerability assessment techniques: application to the Néblon River basin (Belgium). Env Geol 44:881–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INTA (Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria) (1989) Carta de Suelos de la República Argentina (1:50.000) [Soils chart of Argentina] Proyecto PNUD ARG 85/019. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca-INTA, Buenos Aires, Argentina

  • Jenks G (1977) Optimal data classification for choropleth maps. Department of Geography occasional paper no. 2, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenks G, Caspall F (1971) Error on choropleth maps: definition, measurement, and reduction. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 61(2):217–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchese H, Di Paola E (1975) Reinterpretación estratigráfica de la perforación Punta Mogotes 1: Provincia de Buenos Aires, República Argentina [Stratigraphic interpretation of “Punta Mogotes 1” well: Buenos Aires Province, Argentina]. Rev Assoc Geol Arg, Buenos Aires 30(1):44–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Margat J (1968) Groundwater vulnerability to contamination. Publication 68, BRGM, Orleans, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Massone H, Tomas M, Farenga M (2005) Una aproximación geológica a la planificación de usos del territorio utilizando técnicas SIG. Balcarce (Argentina) como estudio de caso [A geologic approach to land-use planning by use of GIS: Balcarce (Argentina) as study case]. XVI Congreso Geológico Argentino, Actas V, La Plata, Argentina

    Google Scholar 

  • Massone H, Quiroz Londoño M, Tomas M, Ferrante A (2007) Evaluación de la vulnerabilidad de acuíferos en cuencas de llanura periserranas. Estudio de caso, Balcarce, Provincia de Buenos Aires. (aquifer vulnerability assessment in inter-range basins. Balcarce, Buenos Aires Province as study case). V Congreso Argentino de Hidrogeología, vol , IAH, Paraná, Argentina, pp 149–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray A, Shyy T (2000) Integrating attribute and space characteristics in choropleth display and spatial data mining. Int J Geogr Inform Sci 14(7):649–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popescu IC, Gardin N, Brouyere S, Dassargues A (2008) Groundwater vulnerability assessment using physically-based modelling: from challenges to pragmatic solutions. In: Calibration and reliability in groundwater modelling: credibility of modelling. Proceedings of ModelCARE 2007 Conference, Denmark, September 2007, IAHS Publ. 320, IAHS, Wallingford, UK

  • Quiroz Londoño O, Martínez D, Massone H, Bocanegra E, Ferrante A (2006) Hidrogeología del Área Interserrana Bonaerense: Cuencas de los Arroyos El Moro, Tamangueyú y Seco [Hydrogeology of the Inter-range area of Buenos Aires province: el Moro, Tamangueyú and Seco creeks]. VIII Congreso Latinoamericano de Hidrología Subterránea y EXPOAGUA 2006, Asunción, Paraguay

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez R, Civita M, de Maio M (2003) Aquifer vulnerability and risk. 1st International Workshop, Proceedings, UNAM, Guanajuato, Mexico, May 2003

  • Sala J (1975) Recursos Hídricos [Hydraulic resources]. Relatorio VI Congreso Geológico Argentino, Bahia Blanca, Argentina, pp 169–194

  • Secunda S, Collin M, Molloul A (1998) Groundwater vulnerability assessment using a composite model combining DRASTIC with extensive agricultural land use in Israel’s Sharon region. J Environ Manage 54:39–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slocum TA (1999) Thematic cartography and visualization. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Teruggi M (1954) El mineral volcánico-piroclástico en la sedimentación cuaternaria Argentina [The volcanic-pyroclastic mineral in the quaternary sedimentation of Argentina]. Rev Asoc Geol Arg (Buenos Aires) IX(3):184–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornthwaite C (1948) An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geogr Rev 38:55–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrba J, Zaporozec A (1994) Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability. Int. Cont. Hydrogeol, vol 16, Heise, Hannover

  • Wang Y, Merkel B, Li Y, Ye H, Fu S, Ihm D (2007) Vulnerability of groundwater in Quaternary aquifers to organic contaminants: a case study in Wuham City, China. Env Geol 53:479–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was carried out with funding from the National Agency for Science and Technology (Pict 7-13891 project) and the National University of Mar del Plata, Argentina (EXA 316/05 project). The authors thank two anonymous reviewer and the editors for their valuable suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Héctor Massone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Massone, H., Quiroz Londoño, M. & Martínez, D. Enhanced groundwater vulnerability assessment in geological homogeneous areas: a case study from the Argentine Pampas. Hydrogeol J 18, 371–379 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-009-0506-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-009-0506-3

Keywords