Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Periprothetische Femurfrakturen bei Hüftgelenkprothesen

Periprosthetic femoral fractures by hip prostheses

  • Übersichten
  • Published:
Trauma und Berufskrankheit

Zusammenfassung

Mit der Zunahme der Zahl der implantierten Hüftprothesen, der Erweiterung des diesbezüglichen Indikationsspektrums auch auf Risikogruppen sowie der steigenden Zahl an Prothesenwechseln kommt es zunehmend häufiger zu periprothetischen Frakturen. Deren Versorgung erfordert umfangreiche Kenntnisse hinsichtlich der Anatomie, der Funktionalität des Gelenks, der Revisionsendoprothetik, moderner Osteosyntheseverfahren, aber auch der Vermeidung und Beherrschung der nicht seltenen Komplikationen.

Abstract

The increasing number of implanted hip prostheses, extension of the indication spectrum to risk groups and the increasing number of revision prostheses mean that periprosthetic fractures also occur more often. Treatment necessitates comprehensive knowledge with respect to anatomy, joint functionality, revision implants, modern osteosynthesis procedures and avoidance and mastering the relatively common complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8

Literatur

  1. Barden B, Ding Y, Fitzek JG, Loer F (2003) Strut allografts for failed treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures: good outcome in 13 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 74(2):146–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berry DJ (1999) Epidemiology: hip and knee. Orthop Clin North Am 30(2):183–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berry DJ (2003) Periprosthetic fractures associated with osteolysis: a problem on the rise. J Arthroplasty [Suppl 1] 18(3):107–111

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brady OH, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP (2000) The reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification of femoral fractures after hip replacement. J Arthroplasty 15(1):59–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chatoo M, Parfitt J, Pearse MF (1998) Periprosthetic acetabular fracture associated with extensive osteolysis. J Arthroplasty 13(7):843–845

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cook SD, Barrack RL, Santman M et al (2000) The Otto Aufranc Award. Strut allograft healing to the femur with recombinant human osteogenic protein-1. Clin Orthop Relat Res 381:47–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Giannoudis PV, Kanakaris NK, Tsiridis E (2007) Principles of internal fixation and selection of implants for periprosthetic femoral fractures. Injury 38(6):669–687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gras F, Marintschev I, Klos K ert al (2010) Navigated percutaneous screw fixation of a periprosthetic acetabular fracture. J Arthroplasty 25(1169):e1–e4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gravius S, Pagenstert G, Weber O et al (2009) Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision surgery of the hip. Autologous, homologous or metal? Orthopade 38–8:729–740

  10. Haddad FS, Duncan CP, Berry DJ et al (2002) Periprosthetic femoral fractures around well-fixed implants: use of cortical onlay allografts with or without a plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(6):945–950

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kavanagh BF, Wallrichs S, Dewitz M et al (1994) Charnley low-friction arthroplasty of the hip. Twenty-year results with cement. J Arthroplasty 9(3):229–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lindahl H, Malchau H, Herberts P, Garellick G (2005) Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish national hip arthroplasty register. J Arthroplasty 20(7):857–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindahl H, Malchau H, Oden A, Garellick G (2006) Risk factors for failure after treatment of a periprosthetic fracture of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(1):26–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Masri BA, Meek RM, Duncan CP (2004) Periprosthetic fractures evaluation and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:80–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Meek RM, Garbuz DS, Masri BA et al (2004) Intraoperative fracture of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty with a diaphyseal fitting stem. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(3):480–485

    Google Scholar 

  16. Meyer C, Alt V, Schroeder L et al (2007) Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures by effective lengthening of the prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 463:120–127

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ninan TM, Costa ML, Krikler SJ (2007) Classification of femoral periprosthetic fractures. Injury 38(6):661–668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Olsen RV, Munk PL, Lee MJ et al (2000) Metal artifact reduction sequence: early clinical applications. Radiographics 20(3):699–712

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Paprosky WG, Magnus RE (1994) Principles of bone grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 298:147–155

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Peterson CA, Lewallen DG (1996) Periprosthetic fracture of the acetabulum after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78(8):1206–1213

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zalzal P, Gandhi R, Petruccelli D et al (2003) Fractures at the tip of long-stem prostheses used for revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 18(6):741–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Erlanger Allee 101, 07740, Jena, Deutschland

    T. Mückley

Authors
  1. T. Mückley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Mückley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mückley, T. Periprothetische Femurfrakturen bei Hüftgelenkprothesen. Trauma Berufskrankh 13 (Suppl 1), 141–146 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10039-011-1780-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10039-011-1780-6

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation