Abstract
The present paper focus on the possible impact of university graduates’ internal mobility in Switzerland. This is an interesting setting because all the cantons have to bear the public costs for their students irrespective of the students’ study place of choice. As not all the cantons have a university, in some cantons students have to leave their home involuntarily to attend university. Focusing on the description of factors explaining internal graduate mobility, we investigate which of the cantons lose potential tax payers for which they had to bear the study costs and discuss the potential consequences on the financing of higher education. On average, half of the students who had left their place of living in order to study do not return to their home canton. Approximately half of those who do not return from the canton in which they studied move to a third canton. Besides other factors, which are linked to post-graduation mobility, we find that top-performing students return less often than low performers. As a consequence, the cantons without universities face a quantitative as well as a qualitative disadvantage compared to cantons with a university.
Zusammenfassung
Die vorliegende Arbeit untersucht die möglichen Auswirkungen der internen Mobilität von Hochschulabsolventen in der Schweiz. Ein empirisch interessantes Setting, da nicht alle Kantone eine Universität haben, müssen in einigen Kantonen die Studierenden ihre Heimat fürs Studium verlassen. Ausgehend von der Beschreibung der Faktoren, die die interne Mobilität der Absolventen erklären, untersuchen wir, welche der Kantone potenzielle Steuerzahler, für die sie die Studienkosten tragen mussten, verlieren und diskutieren mögliche Folgen für die Finanzierung der Hochschulbildung. Etwa die Hälfte derjenigen, die aus dem Kanton, in dem sie studiert haben, nicht zurückkehren, ziehen in einen dritten Kanton. Neben anderen Faktoren, die mit der Mobilität von Hochschulabsolventinnen und -absolventen zusammenhängen, stellen wir fest, dass leistungsstarke Studierende seltener zurückkehren als leistungsschwache. Dies hat zur Folge, dass die Herkunftskantone, die den Grossteil der Kosten auch für die mobilen Studierenden tragen, beim Verlust von Absolventinnen und Absolventen sowohl einen quantitativen wie qualitativen Nachteil haben.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The Swiss cantons are comparable with US states, German Länder or the Canadian provinces in terms of their degree of autonomy in educational policy.
Additionally there are two Federal Institutes of Technology (ETH, EPFL) and two private universities. In our analyses we exclude the two Federal Institutes of Technology and private universities as their financing differs from the cantonal universities; e.g. cantons do not have to pay for their students if they choose to study at one of the Federal Institutes of Technology (EDK 1997). There are also two other types of higher education institutions, the Universities of Applied Sciences and the Universities of Teacher Education. Because of the differences in terms of admission criteria to these institutions (Universities of Applied Sciences) and the differences in terms of labour markets (Universities of Teacher Education), we decided not to include the graduates of these types of institutions in our analyses. They could be analysed in a separate study however.
The numerus clausus was introduced in 1999 (in some medical disciplines later). In our sample, this only applies to individuals of certain cohorts who we have excluded from our analyses.
There are also subsidies coming from the Federal level but most of the federal funds cover directly research expenditures and not teaching costs for undergraduate and graduate students.
The study costs for foreign students have to be covered by the canton of study, and are therefore not covered by the IUV or by federal funds.
The canton of residence can differ from the canton in which the graduates work, as some graduates may choose to work in another canton than where they live after graduation.
The dataset analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on request.
Due to our focus on internal mobility within Switzerland, we excluded graduates who moved abroad.
A probit regression in the appendix (see Table 8) shows the factors that affect the probability of graduates, who had initially stayed in their home canton, to leave it five years after graduation. In comparison to the results for mobile students, the graduate mobility of students who studied in the canton of origin is not linked with the students’ performance at university. Tax levels, however, are a reason to leave the home canton. At first glance, the positive effect of GDP per capita in the canton of origin is counterintuitive and cannot be interpreted causally. This is probably related to the fact that the GDP per capita is general higher in university-cantons.
We also analyzed the determinants for the full sample of mobile students (results are available on request). However, we choose to present the specification with two samples because too many of the explanatory variables may differ between the two groups.
References
Abreu M, Faggian A, McCann P (2014) Migration and inter-industry mobility of UK graduates. J Econ Geogr 15(2):353–385. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbt043
Bjerke L, Mellander C (2017) Moving home again? Never! The locational choices of graduates in Sweden. Ann Reg Sci 59(3):707–729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-016-0777-2
Buenstorf G, Geissler M, Krabel S (2016) Locations of labour market entry by German university graduates: is (regional) beauty in the eye of the beholder? Rev Reg Res 36(1):29–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-015-0102-z
Bundesamt für Statistik (2009) Technisches Handbuch der Erstbefragung der Hochschulabsolventen/innenstudien. BFS, Neuchâtel
Bundesamt für Statistik (2016) Erhebung Quellen – Absolventen Hochschulen Steckbrief. https:// www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/bildung-wissenschaft/erhebungen/ ashs.html. Accessed 15 Feb 2018
Bundesamt für Statistik (2017) Binnenzuwanderung der ständigen Wohnbevölkerung nach Kanton, Staatsangehörigkeit (Kategorie), Geschlecht, Zivilstand und Alter. https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/bevoelkerung/migration-integration/binnenwanderung.assetdetail.6067443.html. Accessed 30 Nov 2018
Busch O, Weigert B (2010) Where have all the graduates gone? Internal cross-state migration of graduates in Germany 1984–2004. Ann Reg Sci 44(3):559–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0274-3
Capuano S (2012) The South-North mobility of Italian college graduates. An empirical analysis. Eur Soc Rev 28(4):538–549. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcr023
Corcoran J, Faggian A (eds) (2017) Graduate migration and regional development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784712167
Crescenzi R, Holman N, Orru E (2016) Why do they return? Beyond the economic drivers of graduates return migration. Ann Reg Sci 59(3):603–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-016-0762-9
Demange G, Fenge R, Uebelmesser S (2014) Financing higher education in a mobile world. J Public Econ Theory 16(3):343–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12064
EDK (Schweizerische Konferenz der kantonalen Erziehungsdirektoren) (1997) Interkantonale Universitätsvereinbarung. EDK, Bern
Faggian A, McCann P, Sheppard S (2007) Somme evidence that women are more mobile than men: gender differences in U.K. graduate migration behavior. J Reg Sci 47(3):517–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2007.00518.x
Falk S, Kratz F (2009) Regionale Mobilität von Hochschulabsolventen beim Berufseinstieg. Beiträge Zur Hochschulforsch 31(3):52–67
FTA (Federal Tax Administration) (2017) The Swiss tax system. FTA, Bern
Gérard M, Uebelmesser S (2014) Financing higher education when students and graduates are internationally mobile. In: Gérard M, Uebelmesser (eds) The mobility of students and the highly skilled implications for education financing and economic policy. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 145–188
Haapanen M, Tervo H (2012) Migration of the highly educated: evidence from residence spells of university graduates. J Reg Sci 52(4):587–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00745.x
Haupt A, Krieger T, Lange T (2016) Competition for the international pool of talent. J Popul Econ 29(4):1113–1154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-016-0601-4
Haussen T, Uebelmesser S (2016) Student and graduate migration and its effect on the financing of higher education. Educ Econ 24(6):573–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2015.1113234
Haussen T, Uebelmesser S (2018a) Job changes and interregional migration of graduates. Reg Stud 52(10):1346–1359. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1381335
Haussen T, Uebelmesser S (2018b) No place like home? Graduate migration in Germany. Growth Change 49(3):442–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12249
Krabel S, Flöther C (2014) Here today gone tomorrow? Regional labour mobility of German university graduates. Reg Stud 48(10):1609–1627. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.739282
Lee ES (1966) A theory of migration. Demography 3(1):47–57
Maier MF, Sprietsma M (2016) Does it pay to move? Returns to regional mobility at the start of the career for tertiary education graduates. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 16-060. Mannheim. http://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp16060.pdf. Accessed 11 Apr 2019
Marinelli E (2013) Sub-national graduate mobility and knowledge flows: an exploratory analysis of onward-and return-migrants in Italy. Reg Stud 47(10):1618–1633. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.709608
Mohr H (2002) Räumliche Mobilität von Hochschulabsolventen. In: Bellmann L, Velling J (eds) Arbeitsmärkte für Hochqualifizierte Beiträge zur Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, vol 256. Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Nürnberg, pp 249–277
Moretti E (2004) Estimating the social return to higher education: evidence from longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional data. Journal of Econometrics 121(1-2):175–212
Newbold KB (2017) Graduate migration in Canada. In: Corcoran J, Faggian A (eds) Graduate migration and regional development: an international perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 42–58
OECD (2009) OECD Economic surveys Switzerland. OECD, Paris
OECD (2015) Education at a glance 2015: OECD Indicators. OECD, Paris
Oosterbeek H, Webbink D (2011) Does studying abroad induce a brain drain? Economica 78(310):347–366
Poutvaara P (2001) Alternative tax constitutions and risky education in a federation. Regional Science and Urban Economics 31(2-3):355–377
Von Proff S, Duschl M, Brenner T (2016) Motives behind the mobility of university graduates—A study of three German universities. Rev Reg Res 37(1):39–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-016-0107-2
Ramos R, Royuela V (2017) Graduate migration in Spain: the impact of great recession in low mobility country. In: Corcoran J, Faggian A (eds) Graduate migration and regional development: an international perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 159–172
SCCRE (Swiss Coordination Centre for Research in Education) (2018) Bildungsbericht Schweiz 2018. SCCRE, Aarau
Sjaastad LA (1962) The costs and returns of human migration. J Polit Econ 70(5):80–93
Venhorst VA, Van Dijk J, Van Wissen L (2010) Do the best graduates leave the peripheral areas of the Netherlands? Tijdschrift Voor Econ En Sociale Geografie 101(5):521–537
Venhorst VA, Van Dijk J, Van Wissen L (2011) An analysis of trends in spatial mobility of Dutch graduates. Spat Econ Anal 6(1):57–82
Winters JV (2013) Human capital externalities and employment differences across metropolitan areas of the USA. J Econ Geogr 13(5):799–822. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs046
Winters JV (2017) Do earnings by college major affect graduate migration? Ann Reg Sci 59(3):629–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-016-0748-7
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oggenfuss, C., Wolter, S.C. Are they coming back? The mobility of university graduates in switzerland. Rev Reg Res 39, 189–208 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-019-00132-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-019-00132-4