Advertisement

Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 107–133 | Cite as

Marshall or Jacobs? New insights from an interaction model

  • Jan Kluge
  • Robert LehmannEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The debate on localization and urbanization economies usually neglects interdependencies between the two types of economies. This paper addresses this problem by employing an interaction model using German data covering four different sectors for the years 1998 to 2008. We find that localization and urbanization economies interact negatively in most of the sectors. Furthermore, we study non-linear effects of specialization and diversification. Taking these into account, the signs indicating localization and urbanization economies change at certain thresholds. Our regression analysis shows evidence of localization economies in manufacturing and basic services. Urbanization economies are generally less prevalent in our data.

Keywords

Localization and urbanization economies Interaction models Regional gross valued added 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Georg Hirte, Marcel Thum and participants of the Brown Bag Seminar presented by the Faculty of Business and Economics at the Dresden University of Technology. We acknowledge very helpful comments from participants of the ERSA 2012 conference in Bratislava and two anonymous referees.

References

  1. Almeida R (2007) Local economic structure and growth. Spatial Econ Anal 2(1):65–90. doi: 10.1080/17421770701232442 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews DWK (1991) Heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix estimation. Econometrica 59(3):817–858 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrow KJ (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev Econ Stud 29(3):155–173. doi: 10.2307/2295952 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bathelt H, Glückler J (2003) Toward a relational economic geography. J Econ Geogr 3(2):117–144. doi: 10.1093/jeg/3.2.117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baum CF, Schaffer ME, Stillman S (2003) Instrumental variables and GMM: estimation and testing. Stata J 3(1):1–31 Google Scholar
  6. Beaudry C, Schiffauerova A (2009) Who’s right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate. Res Policy 38(2):318–337. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blien U, Suedekum J (2005) Local economic structure and industry development in Germany, 1993–2001. Econ Bull 15(17):1–8 Google Scholar
  8. Blien U, Suedekum J, Wolf K (2006) Local employment growth in West Germany: a dynamic panel approach. Labour Econ 13(4):445–458. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2006.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brakman S, van Marrewijk C (2013) Reflections on cluster policies. Cambridge J Regions Econ Soc 6(2):217–231. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rst001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brambor T, Clark W, Golder M (2006) Understanding interaction models: improving empirical analyses. Polit Anal 14(1):63–82. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpi014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brunow S, Hirte G (2009) The age pattern of human capital and regional productivity: a spatial econometric study on German regions. Pap Reg Sci 88(4):799–823. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2009.00228.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Combes P (2000) Economic structure and local growth: France, 1984–1993. J Urban Econ 47(3):329–355. doi: 10.1006rjuec.1999.2143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dauth W (2013) Agglomeration and regional employment dynamics. Pap Reg Sci 92(2):419–435. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00447.x Google Scholar
  14. Dekle R (2002) Industrial concentration and regional growth: evidence from the prefectures. Rev Econ Stat 84(2):310–315. doi: 10.1162/003465302317411550 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dissart JC (2003) Regional economic diversity and regional economic stability: research results and agenda. Int Reg Sci Rev 26(4):423–446. doi: 10.1177/0160017603259083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Driscoll JC, Kraay AC (1998) Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Rev Econ Stat 80(4):549–560. doi: 10.1162/003465398557825 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ehrl P (2011) Agglomeration economies with consistent productivity estimates. BGPE discussion paper No. 113 Google Scholar
  18. Fahrhauer O, Kröll A (2012) Diversified specialization-going one step beyond regional economics’ specialization-diversification concept. Rev Reg Res 32(1):63–84. doi: 10.1007/s10037-011-0063-9 Google Scholar
  19. Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning (BBR) (2010) Indikatoren und Karten zur Raum- und Stadtentwicklung, INKAR, Ausgabe 2010. The Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development (BBSR) within the Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning (BBR) Google Scholar
  20. Feldman MP, Audretsch DB (1999) Innovation in cities: science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. Eur Econ Rev 43(2):409–429. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00047-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fuchs M (2011) The determinants of local employment dynamics in Western Germany. Empir Econ 40(1):177–203. doi: 10.1007/s00181-010-0420-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. German Federal Employment Agency (2010) Statistics of the Federal Employment Agency-employed persons subject to social security according to selected branches of the economy, selected regions (place of work). Data upon request, Nuremberg 2010 Google Scholar
  23. Glaeser E, Kallal H, Scheinkman J, Shleifer A (1992) Growth in cities. J Polit Econ 100(6):1126–1152. doi: 10.1086/261856 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Henderson V, Kuncoro A, Turner M (1995) Industrial development in cities. J Polit Econ 103(5):1067–1090. doi: 10.1086/262013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoechle D (2007) Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. Stata J 7(3):281–312 Google Scholar
  26. Illy A, Schwartz M, Hornych C, Rosenfeld M (2011) Local economic structure and sectoral employment growth in German cities. J Econ Soc Geogr 102(5):582–593. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2011.00659.x Google Scholar
  27. Jacobs J (1970) The economy of cities. Vintage, New York Google Scholar
  28. Krugman PR (2011) The new economic geography, now middle-aged. Reg Stud 45(1):1–7. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.537127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee B, Sosin K, Hong S (2005) Sectoral manufacturing productivity growth in Korean regions. Urban Stud 42(7):1201–1219. doi: 10.1080/00420980500121889 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lucas RE (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monet Econ 22(1):3–42. doi: 10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. de Lucio JJ, Herce JA, Goicolea A (2002) The effects of externalities on productivity growth in Spanish industry. Reg Sci Urban Econ 32(2):241–258. doi: 10.1016/S0166-0462(01)00081-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marshall A (1890) Principles of economics. MacMillan, London Google Scholar
  33. Martin P, Mayer T, Mayneris F (2011) Spatial concentration and plant-level productivity in France. J Urban Econ 69(2):182–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2010.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mukkala K (2004) Agglomeration economies in the Finnish manufacturing sector. Appl Econ 36(21):2419–2427. doi: 10.1080/0003684042000287655 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Newey WK, West KD (1987) A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55(3):703–708 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Paci R, Usai S (2005) Agglomeration economies and growth in Italian local labour systems. 1991–2001, ERSA conference papers Google Scholar
  37. Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CESifo working paper series No 1229 Google Scholar
  38. Romer PM (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Polit Econ 94(5):1002–1037. doi: 10.1086/261420 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rosenthal SS, Strange WC (2004) Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. In: Henderson J, Thisse JF (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economics: cities and geography. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 2119–2171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schaffer ME, Stillman S (2010) xtoverid: stata module to calculate tests of overidentifying restrictions after xtreg, xtivreg. xtivreg2. xthtaylor. http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s456779.html
  41. van Soest DP, Gerking SD, van Oort FG (2002) Knowledge externalities, agglomeration economies, and employment growth in Dutch cities. CentER discussion paper No 2002-41 Google Scholar
  42. Stock JH, Yogo M (2002) Testing for weak Instruments in linear IV regression. NBER technical working paper 284 Google Scholar
  43. Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  44. Working Group Regional Accounts VGRdL (2010) Stock of fixed assets in Germany by Bundesland and East-West-Regions 1991 to 2008. Working group regional accounts VGRdL, Series 1, Regional results Volume 4, Date of calculation: August 2010, Stuttgart 2011 Google Scholar
  45. Working Group Regional Accounts VGRdL (2011) Gross domestic product, gross value added in Germany on NUTS-3 level 1992. 1994 to 2009. working group regional accounts VGRdL, Series 2, Regional results Volume 1, Date of calculation: August 2010, Stuttgart, 2011 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ifo Institute, Leibniz-Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich e.V., Branch DresdenUniversity of MunichDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations