Abstract
This article examines and discusses how different theoretical perspectives from historical political economy may contribute to the understanding of why the regionalization attempt in northern Sweden has failed. Since cohesion and adaptation at the intermediate level of government has been a crucial factor behind successful regionalization in Sweden, the article focuses on the county council in Västernorrland. It is argued that the long-standing political differences and disputes between agents from different geographical areas within the county council in Västernorrland was one of the most important causes behind the failed regionalization attempt. In order to elucidate these disputes and thereby to increase the understanding of the failed regionalization process, this article deals with three different theoretical perspectives, which complement and interface with each other. The first perspective focuses on voters and elections and is broadly based on the rational choice political theory. The second perspective deals with the role of the bureaucracy and introduces theories related to governance and control. Finally, the third perspective discusses the role of historical institutions such as spatial policy.
Zusammenfassung
Dieser Artikel untersucht und diskutiert wie verschiedene theoretische Perspektiven der historischen politischen Ökonomie zum Verstehen beitragen könnten, wenn es darum geht, warum die Regionalisierung in Nordschweden fehlgeschlagen ist. Da Zusammenhalt und Anpassung auf dem regionalen Regierungsniveau der ausschlaggebende Faktor für erfolgreiche Regionalisierung in Schweden gewesen sind, konzentriert sich dieser Artikel auf den Provinziallandtag in Västernorrland. Es wird die Auffassung vertreten, daß die seit langem andauernden politischen Differenzen und Meinungsverschiedenheiten zwischen den Vertretern der verschiedenen geographischen Gebiete innerhalb des Provinziallandtages Västernorrland einer der wichtigsten Gründe des missglückten Regionalisierungsversuchs waren. Um diese Meinungsverschiedenheiten zu erklären und dabei das Verständnis für den missglückten Regionalisierungsversuch zu erhöhen, bezieht sich dieser Artikel auf drei verschiedene theoretische Perspektiven, die einander teils ergänzen und teils verbinden. Die erste Perspektive konzentriert sich auf Wähler und Wahlen und stützt sich auf die politische Theorie der rationalen Entscheidung. Die zweite Perspektive bezieht sich auf die Rolle der Bürokratie und introduziert Theorien in Bezug auf Regierungsgewalt und Kontrolle. Schließlich diskutiert die dritte Perspektive die Rolle der historischen Steuerungsmechanismen wie z.B. raumbezogene Politik.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alchian AA, Demsetz H (1972) Production, information costs, and economic organization. Am Econ Rev 62(5):777–792
Andersson F (2004) Towards the future on old tracks? Regional interest groups and decision-making processes concerning coastal railways in Norrland during the 20th century (‘Mot framtiden pågamla spår? Regionala intressegrupper och beslutsprocesser kring kustjärnvägarna i Norrland under 1900-talet’). Dissertation, Umeå University
Bengtsson T, Johansson M (1993) Economic and social factors behind the slow-down of migration in Northern Sweden. In: Jussila H, Persson LO, Wiberg U (eds) Shifts in systems at the top of Europe. Forskningsgruppen för regional analys, Avd för Regional Planering, Kungl Tekniska Högskolan, Stockholm, pp 33–47
Buchanan JM, Tullock G (1965) The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor Paperbacks, Ann Arbor
Bäcklund D (1997) How the city got its muscles. The economy after 1945 (’Hur staden fick sina muskler. Näringslivet efter 1945’). In: Tedebrand L-G (ed) The history of Sundsvall, Part II (‘Sundsvalls historia, del II’). Sundsvall, pp 66–100
Christaller W (1966) Central places in southern Germany. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall
Downs A (1957) An economic theory of democracy. Harper & Row, New York
Eriksson K (2009a) The regionalization process in northern Sweden (’Regionaliseringsprocessen i norra Sverige’). In Lidström A (ed) Is it possible to regionalize northern Sweden? Decision-making processes and citizenship (’Kan norra Sverige regionaliseras. Beslutsprocesser och medborgarperspektiv’). Umeå University, Department of Political Science, Research Report 2009:2: pp 9–50
Eriksson M (2009b) Transport policy and regional transformation. The decision-making processes concerning ice-breaking along the coast of Norrland, Sweden, 1940–1975 (‘Trafikpolitik och regional omvandling. Beslutsprocesserna om isbrytningen längs Norrlandskusten 1940–1975’). Dissertation, Umeå University
Eriksson M (2010) (Re)producing a periphery. Popular representations of the Swedish North. Dissertation, Umeå University
Hall PA (1997) The role of interests, institutions, and ideas in the comparative political economy of the industrialized states. In: Lichbach MA, Zuckerman AS (eds) Comparative politics: rationality, culture, and structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 174–207
Immergut E (1992) Health politics. Interests and institutions in Western Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kanazawa MT, Noll RG (1994) The origins of state railroad regulation: the Illinois constitution of 1870. In: Goldin C, Libecap GD (eds) The regulated economy. A historical approach to political economy. NBER, Chicago, pp 13–54
Krueger AO (1996) The political economy of control: American sugar. In: Alston LJ, Eggertsson T, North D (eds) Empirical studies in institutional change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lidström A (2009) Do Norlanders want larger regions? (’Vill norrlänningarna ha större regioner?’). In: Lidström A (ed) Is it possible to regionalize northern Sweden? Decision-making processes and citizenship (‘Kan norra Sverige regionaliseras? Beslutsprocesser och medborgarperspektiv’). Research report, Umeå University, Department of Political Science 2009:2: pp 51–80
Lidström A (2010) The Swedish regions and the European Union. In: Scully R, Wyn Jones R (eds) Europe, regions and European regionalism. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 155–171
Mahoney J, Thelen K (2010) A theory of gradual institutional change. In: Mahoney J, Thelen K (eds) Explaining institutional change. Ambiguity, agency and power. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–37
Malmberg B, Korpi M (2000) Starting-points for the regional policy in the 21st Century. Report 8: Population growth and welfare (’Utgångspunkter för 2000-talets regionalpolitik. Rapport 8. Befolkningsutveckling och välfärd’). Fritzes, Stockholm
Niskanen WA (1971) Politics and representative bureaucracy. Aldine, Chicago
Nord L (1995) The voices of discontent—a study of the Health Care Party and the media (‘Missnöjets röster—en studie av Sjukvårdspartiet och medierna’). Swedish Federation of County Councils and the County Council of Västernorrland, Härnösand
North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Olson M (1965) The logic of collective action. Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Olsson J, Åström J (2004) Sweden. In: Dosenrode S, Halkier H (eds) The Nordic regions and the European Union. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 77–91
Petersson O (1994) Swedish government and politics. Fritzes, Stockholm
Pierre J (2004) Politicization of the Swedish civil service: a necessary evil—or just evil. In: Peters GB, Pierre J (eds) Politicization of civil service in comparative perspective. The quest for control. Routledge, London
Riker WA (1962) The theory of political coalitions. Yale University Press, New Haven
Scully R, Wyn Jones R (2010) Introduction: Europe, regions and European regionalism. In: Scully R, Wyn Jones R (eds) Europe, regions and European regionalism. Macmillan, London, pp 1–15
Sprengel V (2009) Ending date for managers more unusual (’Slutdatum för chef allt ovanligare’). Dagens Samhälle 3 December 2009
Statistics Sweden (2010a) The population based on municipality, age and sex (‘Folkmängden efter kommun, ålder och kön’). www.scb.se. Accessed 20 April 2010
Statistics Sweden (2010b), The population in each county every fifth year 1805–2005 (‘Folkmängden länsvis vart femte år 1805–2005’). www.scb.se. Accessed 20 April 2010
Stigler GJ (1971) The theory of economic regulation. Bell J Econ Manag Sci 2(1):3–21
Svedberg H, Weibull L (1994) Health care policy and the formation of public opinion. A Study of how the daily press in three county council areas have dealt with reorganization of health care (‘Sjukvårdspolitik och opinionsbildning. En studie av hur dagspressen i tre landstingsområden behandlat omorganisationen inom sjukvården’). Svensk Informations Mediecenter, Stockholm
Westin K (2009) Is there an identity in Norrland? (’Finns det en norrländsk identitet?’). In: Lidström, A (ed) Is it possible to regionalize northern Sweden? Decision-making processes and citizenship (‘Kan norra Sverige regionaliseras? Beslutsprocesser och medborgarperspektiv’). Research report 2009:2: Umeå University, Department of Political Science, pp 81–93
Westin L, Sörensson R (2006) Report on the economic growth in Norrland. An analysis of the period 1993 to 2002 (‘Rapport om Norrlands tillväxt. En analys av perioden 1993 till 2002’). The County Administrative Board of Gävleborg, Gävle
Williamson OE (1975) Markets and hierarchies. Analysis and antitrust Implications. Free Press, New York
Wilson JQ (1973) Political organizations. Basic Books, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eriksson, M. Why has regionalization failed in northern Sweden?. Jahrb Reg wiss 31, 173–184 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-011-0057-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-011-0057-7