Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Geographical distribution of crime in Italian provinces: a spatial econometric analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last years, the increasing level of criminality that has characterized the modern economies has drawn the attention of sociologists and economists in order to identify the causes leading to commit criminal offences. The aim of the paper is to investigate the causes of crime activity in 103 Italian provinces (NUTS3 regions) for the years 1999 and 2003. The Italian crime phenomenon is characterized by some stylized facts: high spatial and time variability of crime activities, and presence of ‘organized crime’ (e.g. Mafia and Camorra) localized in some local territorial areas.

Using exploratory spatial data analysis (ESDA), the paper firstly explores the spatial structure and distribution of four different typologies of crimes: murders, thefts, frauds and squeezes. ESDA allows us to detect some important geographical dimensions and to distinguish crucial micro- and macro- territorial aspects of offences. Further, on the basis of Becker-Ehrlich model, a spatial cross-sectional model – including deterrence, economic and socio-demographic variables – has been performed to investigate the determinants of Italian crime in 1999 and 2003 and its ‘neighbouring’ effects, measured in terms of ‘geographical’ and ‘relational’ proximities.

The empirical results obtained by using different spatial weights matrices highlighted that socio-economic variables have a relevant impact on crime activities, but their role changes enormously respect to crimes against person (murders) or against property (thefts, frauds and squeezes) and over time.

Zusammenfassung

In den letzten Jahren hat die zunehmende Kriminalitätsrate der modernen Volkswirtschaften die Aufmerksamkeit der Soziologen und Ökonomen auf sich gezogen um die Ursachen zu ermitteln, die dazu führen diese Straftaten zu begehen. Das Ziel dieser Studie ist die Ursachen der Kriminellen Aktivitäten in 103 italienischen Provinzen für die Jahre 1999 und 2003 zu ermitteln. Dieses Phänomen zeichnet sich durch einige stilisierte Fakten: hohe räumliche und zeitliche Veränderlichkeit von kriminellen Aktivitäten und die Präsenz von “organisiertem Verbrechen” (z. B. Mafia und Camorra) örtlich in regionalen Gebieten eingegrenzt. Mittels der explanatory spatial data analysis (ESDA) untersucht die Studie zunächst die räumliche Struktur und Verteilung von vier verschiedenen Arten von Verbrechen: Mord, Diebstahl, Betrug und Erpressung.

ESDA ermöglicht es uns wichtige geographische Dimensionen zu ermitteln und bedeutende Mikro- und Makro-regionale Aspekte von Straftaten zu unterscheiden. Weiterhin, auf der Grundlage des Becker-Ehrlich Modells, wurde ein räumlicher Querschnitt-Modell erstellt, welches Abschreckungsvariabeln, wirtschaftliche und sozio-demographische Variablen miteinbezieht, um die Ursachen zu ermitteln, gemessen bezüglich der geographischen und relationalen Nähe, welche die italienische Kriminalität für die Jahre 1999 und 2003 und ihre “benachbarten” Auswirkungen prägen. Mittels der unterschiedlichen räumlich gewichteten Matrizen zeigen die Ergebnisse, dass die sozio-ökonomischen Variablen eine relevante Auswirkung auf die Kriminellen Aktivitäten haben, aber ihre Rolle sich erheblich ändert mit Bezug auf Verbrechen gegen die Person (Mord) oder gegen Eigentum (Diebstahl, Betrug und Erpressung).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akerlof GA (1997) Social distance and social decision. Econometrica 65:1005–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anselin L (2002) Under the hood. Issues in the specification and in the interpretation of spatial regression model. Agr Econ 27:247–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anselin L, Bera A (1998) Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an application to spatial econometrics. In: Ullah A, Giles DEA (eds) Handbook of applied economic statistics. M. Dekker, New York, pp 255–258

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anselin L, Bera AH, Florax R, Yoon MJ (1996) Simple diagnostic test for spatial dependence. Reg Sci Urban Econ 26:77–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Anselin L, Cohen J, Cook D, Gorr W, Tita G (2000) Spatial analyses of crime. In: Duffee D (ed) Criminal Justice 2000, vol 4. Measurement and Analysis of Crime and Justice. National Institute of Justice, Washington, pp 213–262

    Google Scholar 

  7. Becker GS (1968) Crime and punishment: an economic approach. J Polit Econ 76:169–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Buonanno P (2006) Crime and labour market opportunities in Italy (1993–2002). Labour 20:601–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Buonanno P, Leonida L (2006) Education and crime: evidence from Italian regions. Appl Econ Lett 31:709–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Burdett K, Lagos R, Wright R (2004) An on-the-job search model of crime, inequality, and unemployment. Int Econ Rev 45:681–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cezay AK, Braithwaite J, Chapman B (1998) Unemployment and crime: toward resolving the paradox. J Quant Criminol 14:215–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cherry TL, List JA (2002) Aggregation bias in the economic model of crime. Econ Lett 75:81–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dietz RD (2002) The estimation of neighbourhood effects in the social sciences: an interdisciplinary approach. Soc Sci Res 31:539–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Edmark K (2005) Unemployment and crime: is there a connection? Scand J Econ 107:353–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ehrlich I (1973) Participation in illegitimate activities: a theoretical and empirical investigation. J Polit Econ 81:521–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Entorf H, Spengler H (2000) Socioeconomic and demographic factors of crime in Germany. Evidence from panel data of the German states. Int Rev Law Econ 20:75–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Eronen M, Hakola P, Tiihonen J (1996) Factors associated with homicide recidivism in a 13-year sample of homicide offenders in Finland. Psychiat Serv 47:403–406

    Google Scholar 

  18. Florax RJGM, Folmer H, Rey SJ (2003) Specification searchers in spatial econometrics: the relevance of Hendry’s methodology. Reg Sci Urban Econ 33:557–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Glaeser EL, Sacerdote B, Scheinkman JA (1996) Crime and social interactions. Q J Econ 111:507–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Homant RJ (1984) Employment of ex-offenders: the role of prisonization and self-esteem. J Offender Couns Serv Rehabil 8:5–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hsieh CC, Pugh MD (1993) Poverty, income inequality, and violent crime: a meta-analysis of recent aggregate data studies. Crime Justice 18:182–202

    Google Scholar 

  22. Huang CC, Laing D, Wang P (2004) Crime and poverty: a search-theoretic approach. Int Econ Rev 45:900–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ichiro K, Kennedy BP, Wilkinson RG (1999) Crime: social disorganization and relative deprivation. Soc Sci Med 48:719–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. ISTAT (1998) Statistiche Territoriali. http://www.istat.it Accessed 10 May 2007

  25. ISTAT (1999a) Statistiche Giudiziarie. http://www.istat.it. Accessed 10 May 2007

  26. ISTAT (1999b) Statistiche Demografiche. http://www.istat.it. Accessed 10 May 2007

  27. ISTAT (1999c) Indagine Trimestrale sulle Forze Lavoro. http://www.istat.it. Accessed 10 May 2007

  28. ISTAT (1999d) Dati di Contabilit‘a Nazionale. http://www.istat.it. Accessed 10 May 2007

  29. ISTAT (2000) Statistiche Giudiziarie. http://www.istat.it. Accessed 10 May 2007

  30. ISTAT (2002) Statistiche Territoriali. http://www.istat.it. Accessed 10 May 2007

  31. ISTAT (2003a) Statistiche Giudiziarie. http://www.istat.it. Accessed 10 May 2007

  32. ISTAT (2003b) Statistiche Demografiche. http://www.istat.it. Accessed 10 May 2007

  33. ISTAT (2003c) Indagine Trimestrale sulle Forze Lavoro. http://www.istat.it. Accessed 10 May 2007

  34. ISTAT (2003d) Dati di Contabilit‘a Nazionale. http://www.istat.it. Accessed 10 May 2007

  35. ISTAT (2006) Statistiche Giudiziarie. http://www.istat.it. Accessed 10 May 2007

  36. Leenders RTAJ (2002) Modelling social influence through network autocorrelation: constructing the weight matrix. Soc Networks 24:21–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lochner B (2004) Education, work, and crime: a human capital approach. Int Econ Rev 45:811–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Luiz JH (2001) Temporal association, the dynamics of crime and their economic determinants: a time series econometric model of South Africa. Soc Indic Res 53:33–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Maggioni MA, Nosvelli M, Uberti TE (2007) Space versus networks in the geography of innovation: a European analysis. Pap Reg Sci 86:471–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Marselli R, Vannini M (1997) Estimating a crime equation in the presence of organized crime: evidence from Italy. Int Rev Law Econ 17:89–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Marselli R, Vannini M (2000) Quanto incide la disoccupazione sui tassi di criminalit‘a?. Riv Polit Econ Ottobre-Novembre:273–299

  42. Merlo A (2004) Introduction to economic models of crime. Int Econ Rev 45:677–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Messner SF, Anselin L, Baller RD, Hawkins DF, Deane G, Tolnay SE (1999) The spatial pattering of county homicide rates: an application of explanatory spatial data analysis. J Quant Criminol 15:423–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Orsagh T, Chen JR (1988) The effect of time served on recidivism: an interdisciplinary theory. J Quant Criminol 4:155–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Stigler GJ (1970) The optimum enforcement of laws. J Polit Econ 78:526–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teodora Erika Uberti.

Additional information

JEL classification

C21, K40

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cracolici, M.F., Uberti, T.E. Geographical distribution of crime in Italian provinces: a spatial econometric analysis . Jahrb Regionalwiss 29, 1–28 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-008-0031-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-008-0031-1

Keywords

Navigation