Advertisement

Granular Matter

, 20:29 | Cite as

An experimental investigation on the durability of railway ballast material by magnesium sulfate soundness

  • Ekin Köken
  • Ahmet Özarslan
  • Gürkan Bacak
Original Paper
  • 290 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, the durability of railway ballast material is investigated by magnesium sulfate soundness tests. Two types of ballast aggregates, which are produced from basaltic rocks and currently used as railway ballast in such high speed railway routes in Turkey, are investigated regarding their resistance against freezing–thawing (FT) and traffic loads. Firstly, the mineralogical and physico-mechanical properties of rocks are determined. Then the degradation of investigated ballast aggregates is determined by magnesium sulfate soundness and Los Angeles abrasion (LAA) tests. The natural FT effects are simulated by magnesium sulfate soundness tests up to 40 cycles, whereas the traffic loads are represented by LAA tests up to 3000 revolutions. The ballast fouling that leads to such problems are also investigated within the scope in the present study. The degree of ballast fouling is quantified as fouling index (FI) which is determined using the crushed particles generated after LAA tests. It is concluded from laboratory studies that rock properties considered are considerably influenced by simulated FT cycles. It is also achieved from the laboratory studies that magnesium sulfate soundness and Los Angeles abrasion tests are good indicators to clarify the fragmentation mechanism of the ballast aggregate in laboratory scale. In conclusion several empirical formulas are developed to predict LAA and FI for each rock type. The proposed empirical formulas could be utilized as a pre-design tool for new railway routes in design stage provided that the investigated ballast aggregates are considered.

Keywords

Railway ballast material Aggregate Simulated FT cycles Magnesium sulfate soundness Los Angeles abrasion Ballast fouling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge and appreciate the constructive comments and suggestions of the reviewers and the financial support (Project No: 2016-98150330-01) provided by Bülent Ecevit University.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    UIC/ETF Rail Transport and Environment: Facts and Figures. Paris, p. 68 (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Profillidis, V.A.: Railway Management and Engineering, 4th edn. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li, D., Hyslip, J., Sussmann, T., Chrismer, S.: Railway Geotechnics. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Knutson, R.M., Thompson, M.R.: Permanent-deformation behavior of railway ballast. Transp. Res. Rec. 694, 47–53 (1978)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Selig, E.T., Waters, J.M.: Track Geotechnology and Substructure Management. Thomas Telford Services Ltd., London (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li, D., Selig, E. T.: Evaluation of Railway Subgrade Problems. Transp. Res. Rec. 1489. National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp. 17–25 (1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Feldman, F., Nissen, D.: Alternative testing method for the measurement of ballast fouling: percentage void contamination. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Railway Engineering, Wollongong, Australia. Railway Technical Society of Australia, Canberra, Australia, pp. 101–109 (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Al-Qadi, I., Xie, W., Roberts, R.: Scattering analysis of ground-penetrating radar data to quantify railroad ballast contamination. NDT E Int. 41(6), 441–447 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2008.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dombrow, W., Huang, H., Tutumluer, E.: Comparison of coal dust fouled railroad ballast behavior—granite versus limestone. In: Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways and Airfields, Proceedings of 8th International Conference (BCR2A’09). Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 1349–1357 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paiva, C., Ferreira, M., Ferreira, A.: Ballast drainage in Brazilian railway infrastructures. Constr. Build. Mater. 92, 58–63 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lakušic, S., Ahac, M., Haladin, I.: Experimental investigation of railway track with under sleeper pad. In: 10th Slovenian Road Transp. Cong. Portoroz, Slovenija, pp. 386–393 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koohmishi, M., Palassi, M.: Evaluation of the strength of railway ballast using point load test for various size fractions and particle shapes. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 49, 2655–2664 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-0914-3 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Köken, E., Özarslan, A.: Development of proposals for utilization of point load strength to estimate the strength of ballast material. In: 8th International, Agg. Symp, Kutahya, Turkey, pp. 73–83 (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aursudkij, B.: A laboratory study of railway ballast behaviour under traffic loading and tamping maintenance. Ph.D. Thesis (unpublished), University of Nottingham, p. 215 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rangaraju, P.R., Edlinski, J.: Comparative evaluation of micro-deval abrasion test with other toughness/abrasion resistance and soundness tests. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 20(5), 343–351 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2008)20:5(343) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Han, X., Selig, E.T.: Effects of fouling on ballast settlement. In: Proceedings of 6th International Heavy Haul Railway Conference, Cape Town, South Africa, pp. 257–268 (1997)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moaveni, M., Qian, Y.H., Boler, H. Mishra, D., Tutumluer E.: Investigation of ballast degradation and fouling trends using image analysis. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Railway Tech. Res. Develop. Main. (Pombo, J. (ed.)). Civil-Comp Press, Stirlingshire, UK, Paper 123 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.4203/ccp.104.123
  18. 18.
    Koohmishi, M., Palassi, M.: Effect of particle size distribution and subgrade condition on degradation of railway ballast under impact loads. Granul. Matter 19, 63 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-017-0747-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wnek, M.: Investigation of aggregate properties influencing railroad ballast performance. M.Sc. thesis (unpublished) in Civil Engineering, University of Illinois, p. 235 (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Qian, Y., Boler, H., Moaveni, M., Tutumluer, E., Hashash, Y.M.A., Ghaboussi, J.: Characterizing ballast degradation through Los Angeles abrasion test and image analysis. Transp. Res. Rec. 2448, 126–135 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huang, H., Tutumluer, E., Dombrow, W.: Laboratory characterization of fouled railroad ballast behavior. Transp. Res. Rec. 2117, 93–101 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.3141/2117-12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Parsons,R., Rahman, A.J., Han, J.: Properties of fouled railroad ballast (Phase 1), Final report (Report no: 25-1121-0001-465), Mid-America, Transp. Center, p. 55 (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tennakoon, N., Indraratna, B., Rujikiatkamjorn, C., Nimbalkar, S., Neville, T.: The role of ballast fouling characteristics on the drainage capacity of rail substructure. Geotech. Test. J. 35(4), 629–640 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ104107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    ISRM: The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974–2006. In: Ulusay R, Hudson JA (eds) Suggested methods prepared by the commission on testing methods. Int. Soc. Rock Mech. (ISRM), Ankara, Turkey (2007)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    TS EN 1097-6: Tests for mechanical and physical properties of aggregates—Part 6: determination of particle density and water absorption, p. 51 (2013)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    TS EN 1097-2: Tests for mechanical and physical properties of aggregates—Part 2: methods for the determination of resistance to fragmentation, p. 36 (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    TS EN 1367-2: Tests for thermal and weathering properties of aggregates. Magnesium sulfate test, p. 8 (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Anon: Classification of rocks and soils for engineering geological mapping, Part 1: rock and soil materials. Bull. Int. Eng. Geol. 19, 364–371 (1979)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bieniawski, Z.T.: The point load test in geotechnical practice. Eng. Geol. 9, 1–11 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    BS EN 13450: Aggregates for railway ballast, p. 38 (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mining Engineering DepartmentBulent Ecevit UniversityZonguldakTurkey
  2. 2.Geological Engineering DepartmentBulent Ecevit UniversityZonguldakTurkey

Personalised recommendations